Skip to comments.Darwinism the root of the culture of death: expert
Posted on 02/17/2012 4:17:50 PM PST by wagglebee
click here to read article
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
Bears repeting ...
> Darwinists love to claim that their interest is science,
> but they are actually agents of Satan in the most deadly
> agenda ever pursued in the history of the world.
The complete title of Darwin’s seminal tome was ...
“On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life”
Evolutionism is the same kind of “science” as Anthropomorphic Global Warming.
Rachel Carson (author of "Silent Spring" which resulted in the DDT ban): 50-80 MILLION deaths and rising every year.
Margaret Sanger: 50 MILLION deaths worldwide EVERY YEAR (1 BILLION to 1.2 BILLION worldwide since 1900).
Stalin: 13 MILLION+ deaths.
Hitler: 12 MILLION+ deaths.
Mao: 50-80 MILLION deaths.
So, in just the last century, Darwinist atheism is responsible for the deaths of AT LEAST 1.125 BILLION INNOCENT people. (And note that this only counts the genocide that can be directly attributed to them, if the wars initiated by Stalin, Mao and Hitler were included there would be close to 100 MILLION more.)
> Rachel Carson
I had forgotten about that one.
Thanks for the reminder.
These people are satanic, whether they know it or not.
Don’t forget those evil “Geologists” And them “Physicists.” And don’t even get me started on them damned for all time “Astrophysicists” and “Chemists.”
Have these people no shame? No sense of proportion? No sense of right and wrong?
You’re right, but not enough will understand or admit to it.
You may want to read the article.
Posting a creationist religious tract on other than the Religion thread is kind of like trolling don’t you think. Blaming all scientific inquiry for the abuses and inaccuracies of some is kind of like those who blame Christians in the 21st century for the inquisition. Or perhaps you would burn me at the stake while assuring me I’m damned to hell?
Those darn physicists and their ‘theory of gravity’ (THEORY!!) that they use to help calculate the use of BOMBS! How many deaths is Newton responsible for?
>>You may want to read the article<<
When that tired old strawman about TTOE leading to Eugenics was trotted out, I knew where this was going (note: there is no study of science named “Darwinism” any more than Astronomy is “Capurnicism”).
I am done here, but I wanted outside readers to know that there are many of us who understand science, how it does NOT conflict with scripture nor Christianity (or any other belief system). Clearly there are some others who are also not afraid to let their knowledge show. But many others remain silent after the Crevo wars a few years ago.
And what about heliocentrism? There’s another absolutely diabolical doctrine started by so-called `scientists.’
The Earth is the center of the universe, and these infernal allegations that it is round ... don’t get me started.
I have to go re-charge my brain-stem. Be right back!
>>Those darn physicists and their theory of gravity (THEORY!!) that they use to help calculate the use of BOMBS! How many deaths is Newton responsible for?
I say we burn down the observatory...
If you bothered to read the article you would see that it isn't about creationism, it is about Darwinists and their devotion to the culture of death.
Or are you trying to say that the culture of death IS a religion?
Blaming all scientific inquiry for the abuses and inaccuracies of some is kind of like those who blame Christians in the 21st century for the inquisition.
Except for the FACT that Darwinian eugenics has been used to murder over a billion innocent people.
Or perhaps you would burn me at the stake while assuring me Im damned to hell?
When you or any of the other Darwinists can find a single post where a FReeper has EVER supported burning someone at the stake I will happily join all of the anti-FReepers at DC.
Did the Darwin family start and lead the eugenics movement for nearly a century? YES or NO.
I am done here, but I wanted outside readers to know that there are many of us who understand science,
I've noticed that Darwinists ALWAYS get uncomfortable when the deadly FACTS of Darwin's agenda are exposed. That's why Darwinists love to talk about science.
“Darwinists love to claim that their interest is science, but they are actually agents of Satan in the most deadly agenda ever pursued in the history of the world. “
Are you quoting Satan directly, or reading from the manual?
Wow. The secularist trolls are surely out tonite, aren’t they?
Well I suggest you get me zapped from FR. I don’t know of anything called Darwinism or evolutionism, they sound like religions to me. In point of fact, I am opposed to abortion as I know from science that a unique human being is created at the moment of conception. Those DNA merchants of death came up with that.
The misuse of a science can not discredit science as the misuse is anti-science. Science doesn’t prove, disprove or invent values. I get my values from Christianity and truthfulness is one of them. Value of human life and all life for that matter is another.
The idea that being evolve to a normatively better condition is nonsense from the latter part of the 19th and early part of the twentieth century. If an organism survives, it reproduces. That’s all. What use that is put to by men is up to men and the value of that use can not be proven. Science may be used in a cult of death but it does not produce the cult.
A pound of c4 may be used in building a highway or attached to a terrorist’s belt. The explosion it produces is the same and a scientist built the explosive but did not dictate how it was used. The same analogy works for the theory of evolution. By the same token, the theory is not now identical to the 19th century theory, it has evolved if you will.