Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UPDATE on Fr. Marcel Guarnizo [Denied Lesbian Communion]
An Arcdiocese of Washington Catholic ^ | 3/2/12

Posted on 03/02/2012 6:22:38 AM PST by marshmallow

Deacon Greg posted the following update to his story. It seems that someone from St. John Newmann wrote to him the following:

just wanted to let you know that there is a lot more to this story than has been published। I was in a meeting with Fr Marcel and heard the whole story। The woman in question brought her lesbian partner into the vesting sacristy just before the funeral Mass and made sure to introduce her partner to Fr Marcel, introducing her as her ‘lover’. He told her then that she should not present herself for Communion. I have been to many Masses said by Father Marcel and he is a good and holy priest. He speaks very softly when giving out Holy Communion, almost whispering “Corpus Christi” — and did not publicly denounce her but rather said in a whisper that he could not give her Holy Communion. He did feel sick at the end of Mass and made sure to have a replacement priest accompany the body and family to the cemetery.

Father Marcel has a very active role in the very public and weekly vigils at Carhart’s late term abortion clinic in Germantown. He has been a staunch and vociferous defender of life. It is my belief that this is a calculated attempt to discredit him. (Remember – same sex marriage will be signed into law this week in Maryland.) ‘Catholics for Equality’ and other gay groups are feeling pretty strong right now. Fr Marcel is their enemy because he speaks the truth and does not back down…

I am telling you all this because Fr Marcel cannot speak for himself right now. And because he at the very least deserves the benefit of the doubt from you and Ed Peters and others who do not know.........

(Excerpt) Read more at awashingtondccatholic.blogspot.com ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Moral Issues; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic; homosexualagenda; lesbian; sacraments
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Mrs. Don-o

I am on the side of the Priest.

I think he did the wrong thing, and I think that the Archdiocese is more worried about political fallout then what is right,

That is my own op[inion and I certainly have no right to judge the workings of a Cardinal of the Church, but certainly history bears out the fact that the Church has been wrong before.


21 posted on 03/02/2012 8:16:10 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

I saw a reference where Lesbian, Barbara Johnson is a practicing Buddhist. Does anyone have a link? Thanks


22 posted on 03/02/2012 8:18:25 AM PST by STJPII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

I doubt Fr. Marcel is surprised at Wuerl’s spinelessness. I know I’m not.


23 posted on 03/02/2012 8:19:46 AM PST by workerbee (We're not scared, Maobama -- we're pissed off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Thanx.


24 posted on 03/02/2012 8:20:56 AM PST by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Prayers foro him who stands up and defends the Catholic Faith!


25 posted on 03/02/2012 8:33:26 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: workerbee
"I doubt Fr. Marcel is surprised at Wuerl’s spinelessness. I know I’m not."

But aren't these supposed to be "family matters" that are discussed within the four walls of the Church with any admonishments happening there? Why in the world would you publically humiliate a Priest who was arguably (VERY arguably!)doing the right thing and take the side of an admitted reprobate? What kind of message does that send to the faithful?

26 posted on 03/02/2012 8:42:13 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: redgolum
Marsh, did his bishop support him?

Sadly, no.

HERE is Wednesday's thread on the subject, which tells us that the diocese sent a formal letter of apology to the woman who was denied Communion.

27 posted on 03/02/2012 8:56:10 AM PST by marshmallow (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: circlecity
Know that millions of Catholics across this country share your confusion. For me the "cultural divide" in the Church almost parallels what we see in the Republican party, even in the country as a whole. Two Sundays ago, a visiting priest to our parish received a standing ovation after his homily regarding the imminent legislation to legalize gay marriage in our state. It was one of the most powerful sermons I've ever heard, and certainly a sign that those in the pews are hungry for strong and forthright conviction from our leaders. After Mass, I asked the priest where do they hide the ones like him. If we'd been hearing that kind of thing in our parishes for the last 25 years, we wouldn't be in this mess.
28 posted on 03/02/2012 9:42:48 AM PST by workerbee (We're not scared, Maobama -- we're pissed off!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ransacked
Father Marcel did the right thing.

Yes, he did. And the Urinestream media's spin on this whole incident is absolutely vomit inducing.

29 posted on 03/02/2012 11:16:03 AM PST by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Good on Father Marcel, but the RCC has brought all of this on themselves with their impotent responses to unrepentant, militant evil in their midst, and their complicity with it in many instances. Does anyone actually think that any members of “Catholics for ‘Equality’” will ever be excommunicated, or at the least, denied communion? Not on your life. I wouldn’t be surprised if many priests themselves weren’t closet members.


30 posted on 03/02/2012 11:22:05 AM PST by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
I think we're in agreement on this. I think you meant to say, "I am on the side of the Priest... I think he did the wrong right thing.."

Typo --- s'awright, I do it all the time ;o)

To put it more precisely, the priest AND Church law are right on this (Canon 915 says the priest is to refuse Holy Communion to anyone in "obstinately persevering in manifest grave sin")

The purpose of this is not to be "mean" to the person presenting (herself) for Communion, or to embarrass her in public, but to protect her from committing a sacrilege. This is really love for the woman, because the priest is doing what he can to gain her repentance, her well-being and redemption.

And the priest must always prevent the Sacrament from being profaned.

So the Archbishop is wrong, as I see it, and the Church (Canon 915) is right.

31 posted on 03/02/2012 1:43:50 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (The Holy Catholic Church: the more Holy it is, the more Catholic it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

The Priest was right,

I don’t know what the Cardinal was thinking.

I had to go back and check on my post, I made two of them in that thread, and I cannot believe I screwed that up. Thanks for correcting me.

I might add that this Diocese is the same one that Pelosi, Biden and the rest go to when they have Mass in Washington, the same one that has Annapolis where many Catholics just voted to pass the same sex marriage amendment. The Governor is Catholic and so is Bohannan the sorry ill informed a-hole who made the passing vote.


32 posted on 03/02/2012 2:00:03 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

We should fast and pray.


33 posted on 03/02/2012 2:36:26 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God:" 1 Peter 4:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
Dear Venturer,

Annapolis is in the Archdiocese of Baltimore, which is arguably even more poorly-run than the Archdiocese of Washington.

It seems that Donna Cardinal Wuerl is protecting his own.


sitetest

34 posted on 03/02/2012 2:58:36 PM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

That’s something I didn’t know. I assumed they were in the Archdiocese of Washington, as they are closer to Washington than I am.Thanks for the info.


35 posted on 03/02/2012 3:36:16 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson