Skip to comments.The on-coming Romney onslaught against Christian conservatives [VANITY]
Posted on 04/08/2012 8:37:38 PM PDT by NorthernCrunchyCon
click here to read article
Please give me a substantive list of attacks on Christians that Romney is responsible for.
PS As a Christian, I understand that what Mormons believe is NOT Christianity. However, to launch a religious type of attack on Romney is counter-productive to defeating Obama and can make conservatives seem ignorant and/or bigoted. Leave the attack on religion with the liberals, who openly practice such.
Romney is just a politician. He might not have a moral objection to individual mandates, but would he ram it down America's throat against 70% opposition? No.
He might be skeered of guns, but would he shoot himself in the foot by trying to reinstitute the assault weapon ban? I doubt it. And I doubt he'd turn on the biggest base in the republican party, ie the Christians especially evangelicals.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not a Romney fan and I'll have to hold my nose to vote for him assuming he gets nominated. I'd love to vote for a true, moral, real conservative, but in the end I'd prefer just about anybody to the marxist in chief. Romney sucks, but Obama sucks a hell of a lot more.
People are not Romnet-bots for wanting to get rid of Obama. Look around! Will this country survive another obama term? Zero has big plans in store. No more conservatives on the radio perhaps? 'Hate speeh' after all. No more 'hate speech' on the 'net, ie no more FR? Maybe see about having the second amendment taken out, somehow someway?
Zero has big plans. Thats for sure. Our primary concern MUST be to get him out!
No one wants obama, but there is a very real reason that romney will never be president.
Have you done any serious research on him and his background? When the truth comes out it will destroy his chances in an election amongst both convervatives and socialists alike.
When the left attacks romney, all they will need is the truth packed into hundreds of 30 second sound bytes.
And there will be nothing anyone can do to counter those truths, even with the crap obama has done, people will turn away from romney like the plague.
If the GOP runs romney this election is already over.
We don't know that yet...They are both shooting for the same destination...They are just taking different roads to get us there...
We and the country are screwed either way...
Of course Mitt or his surrogates won’t openly declare a war against Christians before the November election. He needs them to beat Obama. However, his people have been fighting and sabotaging Christians like Governor Palin behind-the-scenes since 2008 presidential election:
Romney is one of the reasons Obama was elected in the first place.
“People are not Romnet-bots for wanting to get rid of Obama. Look around! Will this country survive another obama term? Zero has big plans in store. No more conservatives on the radio perhaps? ‘Hate speeh’ after all. No more ‘hate speech’ on the ‘net, ie no more FR? Maybe see about having the second amendment taken out, somehow someway?”
You raise a good point with regards to accusing conservatives of hate speech. My response is to look at the U.K. and Canada. Most of the attacks by government agencies accusing conservatives of hate speech have come from lefty activists appointed by CINO politicians.
For instance, Alberta is considered Canada’s most conservative province. The conservative party has ruled there for the past 30 years with huge majority governments. (Although that’s about to change in a couple weeks when the Tea Party-like Wildrose Alliance topples the RINO/GOPe-like Progressive Conservative Party).
However, when the party got taken over by CINOs acting like liberals, Christian pastor Stephen Boisson and Jewish conservative political commentator Ezra Levant found themselves hauled before the quasi-judicial Alberta Human Rights Commission - the former for criticizing same-sex marriage, and the latter for republishing Danish cartoons of Mohamed in a national conservative magazine. Both of these individuals were forced to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees to defend themselves against lefty government activists appointed by CINO politicians.
Your definition of a "conservative" is you.
Your definition of "liberals" is politicians, especially if they're Republicans.
Isn't that right EternalMegalomania?
Thanks for the stipulation, EternalMegalomania!
Go back where you came from, jerk.
Get lost. You retards aren’t fooling anyone.
I really don’t get you Mormon-haters. Romney looks to me to be the most personally honest and upstanding candidate to come along in decades. It also looks like Mormonism has made him an exceptional husband, father and businessman. All this hysteria is making you people look really stupid.
I do not get that people can not tell the difference between exposing mormonism and alleged mormon hate.
There is no mormon hate, there is exposing of mormonism.
Romney is a liberal, he is a liberal because of mormonism not in spite of it. Before you defend mormonism, learn about it.
I don't believe Romney's "a liberal". Sorry. I don't buy it. He was the governor of leftwing state and he had a 85% Democrat legislature. He did the best he could as a Republican. He wasn't my candidate, but I'll happily vote for him.
Romney is pro abortion, pro gun grab, pro homosexual agenda, pro man made global warming, pro welfare, pro big government, pro government mantated, pro working with other liberals .... I can see how you would not think that was liberal (eye roll)
I am not sure what the reference to a salamander is, dinner?
If somebody gave $millions upon $millions to Planned Parenthood, but never referred anybody there or never counseled anybody to have an abortion or never vacuumed out somebody's womb with dismembered child on board, would you ask for a list of specific abortion victims specifically linked to that donor?
Or what about somebody who gave $millions & $millions to the KKK?
Would you ask for a list of lynch victims?
Or dates & times in which they wore the white uniform & burned crosses & fomented hate in those venues?
Lds.org & the Lds publishing house Deseret & other venues have plastered an overwhelming amount labeling Christians as "apostates," the church of the devil, a dead & false church, 100% creeds that are an "abomination", 100% professing believers who are "corrupt," etc. etc. etc.
("Thank you" Mitt Romney's checkbook)
Ridiculous lack of logic.
You really didn’t expect a logical answer to your question, did you? This is an anti-Mormon tinfoil thread...if Romney becomes President, innocent Christians will be forced to wear magic underwear, listen to only cds by the Mormon Tabernacle choir, be stripped of their right to caffeine, and forced to look around Missouri to find the lost golden tablets of Joseph Smith.
Oh, the humanity!
I have thought about your request and have decided you are correct. Romney has not said “attack Christians/Christianity” out loud.
So what I want to do is discount that he belongs to a corporation (and never refuted it) that was founded in part with the belief/doctrine that Christians are ‘whores of Babylon”, abominations, part of the devils church, that he has been on the board of a hotel chain that openly promoted their x rated videos for rent, that he supports the homosexual agenda, that he promotes abortion and when governor wrote in to legislation for free and/or only $50 abortions, that he attacked Christians running for president that are vocal Christians distorting their records and left those not vocal alone, supports lds news publications that on a regular basis attack Christians/Christianity
AND totally agree (if discounting all that I have mentioned which is just a partial list) with you.