Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vatican set to control new 'catholic' Internet domain
cns ^ | June 13, 2012 | Cindy Wooden

Posted on 06/13/2012 2:04:13 PM PDT by NYer

VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- The Vatican is in line to control the new Internet address extension ".catholic" and decide who is allowed to use it.

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, a nonprofit corporation that coordinates the assignment of Internet domain names and addresses around the world, announced the Vatican's formal application June 13 in London.

The corporation is overseeing a huge expansion in the number of Internet extensions beyond the standard .com, .org., .edu and .gov. The extensions formally are known as generic top-level domains. The assignment of country-code top-level domains, like the Vatican's own .va, will not be affected by the change.

Msgr. Tighe (CNS/Bob Roller)

Msgr. Paul Tighe, secretary of the Pontifical Council for Social Communications, told Catholic News Service that the Vatican's application to control the top-level domain .catholic "is a recognition of how important the digital space is for the church."

Controlling the top-level domain "will be a way to authenticate the Catholic presence online," Msgr. Tighe said. The Vatican plans to allow "institutions and communities that have canonical recognition" to use the extension, "so people online -- Catholics and non-Catholics -- will know a site is authentically Catholic."

The Vatican does not plan to allow individual bloggers or private Catholics to use ".catholic," Msgr. Tighe said. Use of the domain would be limited to those with a formal canonical recognition: dioceses, parishes and other territorial church jurisdictions; religious orders and other canonically recognized communities; and Catholic institutions such as universities, schools and hospitals.

The Vatican filed four separate applications for new domain names, seeking to control ".catholic" and its equivalent in other languages using Latin letters, as well as the equivalent of the word "Catholic" in the Cyrillic, Arabic and Chinese alphabets.

The fee for each application was $185,000, which Msgr. Tighe said "is a lot of money, but if you think of the money you have to spend to maintain a church structure," and then consider how important the structure of the Catholic presence on the Internet is, it was a good investment.

Controlling the domain name will promote "a more cohesive and organized presence" of the church online, "so the recognized structure of the church can be mirrored in the digital space."

In addition to the fee, the Vatican and other applicants for new generic top-level domains had to fill out complicated forms and must submit to background checks to ensure they are the best representative of the name they chose and to prove they have the financial, technical and institutional stability to run the domain, are not involved in criminal activity and have no history of "cyber-squatting" -- registering a name more properly associated with someone else and trying to sell it at an inflated price.

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers has set up a process for resolving conflicting claims to the same or very similar names, although an auction of some extensions is possible. It said that of the 1,930 applications received, "there are 231 exact matches" with two or more applicants competing for the domain name.

The Vatican was the only applicant asking for .catholic.

When the corporation discussed the idea of expanding the number of generic top-level domains in 2009, the Vatican representative to the corporation's governmental advisory committee, Msgr. Carlo Maria Polvani, expressed concern about "the possible perils" connected with religious domain names, including the risk of "competing claims" and "bitter disputes" between individuals or institutions claiming to represent, for example, Catholics or Muslims or Buddhists.

Msgr. Tighe said June 13 that the concerns, voiced "at a much earlier stage of the process," were meant to warn the corporation of possible conflicts, particularly involving religious groups that do not have any clear or strong central leadership.

Once the corporation decided to move forward with the expansion, he said, "we decided we were best suited to apply for 'catholic.'"

The applications for Latin alphabet domain names revealed June 13 included one request for ".christmas," but no requests for ".christian." Two applicants asked for ".church," but no one asked for ".orthodox," ".lutheran" or ".anglican." Seven applicants asked for ".love," one requested ".islam," but no one requested ".jewish."

At the London news conference announcing the applications, Rod Beckstrom, president of the Internet corporation, said no one had yet been granted the rights to any of the requested domain names.

The vetting process is ongoing and even entities that appear to have a right to the name and the ability to run the new domain are unlikely to have anything online before spring 2013, said Kurt Pritz, vice president. He also said the corporation is asking comments from the public for 60 days. In addition, he said, for the next seven months it will be accepting "formal objections" based on specific criteria such as possible brand or trademark infringement. But formal objections also can be submitted to demonstrate opposition to the applicant from a significant number of people who feel they are represented by the domain name.

The annual fee for the new generic top-level domains is $25,000, the corporation said.

When the Internet corporation began accepting applications in January for new Internet extensions, there were about two dozen approved generic top-level domains, including .info, which was added in 2000, and .travel, which was added in 2004.

The current expansion of top domains will be the largest in Internet history.

TOPICS: Catholic; Ministry/Outreach; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: internet; vatican

1 posted on 06/13/2012 2:04:20 PM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom; thefrankbaum; Tax-chick; GregB; saradippity; Berlin_Freeper; Litany; SumProVita; ...

This should be interesting, ping!

2 posted on 06/13/2012 2:05:25 PM PDT by NYer (Without justice, what else is the State but a great band of robbers? - St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Absolutely, totally, creepy.

hear me now, believe me later.

3 posted on 06/13/2012 2:55:59 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (they have no god but caesar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I’m glad to see this. Kind of an internet version of Nihil Obstat.

A personal anecdote. In my mid-adulthood, I was looking for what the actual Christian teachings were. Naively, I thought I’d look at and compare the various ‘brands’, Methodist, Baptist, Catholic, Presbyterian, etc. and set off to find their views.

I soon discovered there were, for most, no one view, but large possibilities within each. I was unsuccessful in discovering anyone ‘who can speak for the Baptist Church’ and so on. That’s sort of the foundation of Protestantism.

I still remember discovering the Catechism and the phrase nihil obstat - nothing hinders. Ok. This is what they believe and this is what is not contrary to what they believe. Marvelously simple.

So.. I welcome it in cyberspace.

4 posted on 06/13/2012 3:54:19 PM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand
hear me now, believe me later.

We're gonna Pope you up!

5 posted on 06/13/2012 5:33:28 PM PDT by Tanniker Smith (Rome didn't fall in a day, either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith


6 posted on 06/13/2012 5:45:09 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand (they have no god but caesar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Would’ve sworn this said, “VULCAN set to control new ‘catholic’ Internet domain”.

........I’ve clearly been watching too much Star Trek................

7 posted on 06/13/2012 8:04:48 PM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Interesting INDEED! May our Risen Lord grant great blessings to this domain.

(PS I like your new tagline.)

8 posted on 06/14/2012 4:07:49 AM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

Excellent analogy! I had not thought of it in that way but totally agree. It lends a seal of approval to organizations claiming to profess catholic truths. Thanks for the ping and the post.

9 posted on 06/14/2012 5:43:00 AM PDT by NYer (Without justice, what else is the State but a great band of robbers? - St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer

While I support the effort. “.catholic” is to long. Try .ca or .cath

10 posted on 06/14/2012 2:42:51 PM PDT by Bayard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Sounds good to me. That way folks trying to confuse Catholics won’t get the chance to do so under the ‘Catholic’ website domain.

11 posted on 06/14/2012 11:01:27 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson