While I certainly did not advocate lowering the age of consent in any way, you specifically advocated the partial abolition of religious freedom.
In other words, you made a poor analogy.
wideawake, you were responding to a post specifically about child rape and voicing your disapproval. Two of the three sentences in that post specifically have the words “child” and “rape” contained there in.
You took a pretty far stretch to twist condemnation of covering for a pedophile when you know about one into a condemnation of free speech. My response was and is warranted.
Who are covering for, wideawake?
What did they do?
Are they still doing it?
Given the way you tried to twist my words, those are very appropriate questions to ask you. Not that I expect you to be capable of giving an honest answer.
posted on 07/18/2012 9:54:01 AM PDT
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson