[count-your-change]

You'll have to go to the article for the 5 questions. One should have been why a tiny fragment from possibly the 4th. Cen. would be puffed up into a "Gospel of Jesus' Wife" when it is no such thing.

King seems anxious to turn a few lines of unknown origin into new insights into early Christian belief, etc., etc.

"www.christianpost.com/.../the-gospel-of-jesus-wife-ancient-fragment" gives a few more details.

[Hillarys Gate Cult]

I think a dead giveaway that it’s fake is when they refer to her as “Mrs J.”

[circlecity]

Please note the author of this study can provide absolutely no provenance for this fragment. We have no idea where it came from, when it was found or who found it. This indicate strongly that it is a fake or forgery. As do its physical characteristics. Can you say “Secret Gospel of Mark”? I thought you could.