Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can a president really fix America?
WORLD magazine ^ | Oct. 9, 2012 | Anthony Bradley

Posted on 10/09/2012 11:58:32 AM PDT by Alex Murphy

Both conservative and progressive (liberal) church seem to be anxious about the 2012 presidential election. The anxiety is so great that many pastors are willing to bind the consciences of other Christians by telling them how to vote. Over at The Daily Beast, David Sessions highlights the much complained about annual “Pulpit Freedom Sunday” where "copies of hundreds of illegal sermons being mailed to the IRS to challenge its restriction on tax-exempt organizations endorsing political candidates." On the other hand, black pastors, like the Rev. Ottis Moss, pastor President Obama's former church in Chicago for example, are directing Christians in black churches in the same way. Should pastors be doing this?

According to SpeakUpMovement.org the current restriction on pastors talking politics from the pulpit began in 1954, when, then senator, Lyndon B. Johnson proposed the restriction as an amendment to the § 501(c)(3) tax exemption for charitable organizations "to keep two nonprofit organizations in Texas from supporting his political opponent, but the amendment has also had the effect of restricting the right of pastors to speak freely from the pulpit." In other words, the law represents the abuse of law as a political maneuver instead of the use of law for the common good. During the 2008 presidential campaign, many Americans were alarmed how politicized Rev. Jeremiah Wright, President Obama's former pastor, was from the pulpit. Sessions worries that "on the ground in evangelical churches, explicit political talk carries the risk of being divisive and alienating, two things that are deadly to most churches’ goal of getting as many people as possible into the fold." I wonder, however, why this is not also true for all pastors regardless of tradition.

Rev. Otis Moss II and Rev. Charles Jenkins explicitly state all black Christians in black churches "must" vote to reelect president Obama.

"As African-American clergy deeply committed to the welfare of our communities and the future of our country, we are writing to offer our strong and enthusiastic endorsement of President Barack Obama. In the face of laws designed to limit democracy, and voices seeking to depress the participation of our community rather than to empower it, we will not be silent. Too much blood was shed for us to remain on the sidelines. We must stand up once more, and we must keep marching on this November. We must reelect this President."

I am beginning to wonder what Barack Obama can do to support human flourishing in black communities when the prevailing pathologies destroying those neighborhoods, and the rest of America, are primarily moral in nature. The culture of death that sees an unborn child as a non-human, women birthing children out of the context of marriage, the black-on-black violence sending young black men to graves, the breakdown of the family, and so on, are all moral problems that politics cannot fix.

I'm no passivist by any means but it seems that Christians, progressive and conservative alike, may be expecting more from politics than politics can deliver. Our politicians and laws reflect the morality of America's citizenry. Does it not, then, seem more effective for social change for pastors to admonish Christians to focus on pointing their neighbors to Christ? The social change that Christians truly want in America will come when we, the people, desire to live according to our Creator's design.


TOPICS: Moral Issues; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Joe Boucher
What Ronald Reagan did was to thoughtfully take care of business while at the same time he got out of the people's way.

Neither of which BJ has any inclination to do.

21 posted on 10/09/2012 1:41:50 PM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
"I am beginning to wonder what Barack Obama can do to support human flourishing in black communities when the prevailing pathologies destroying those neighborhoods, and the rest of America, are primarily moral in nature. The culture of death that sees an unborn child as a non-human, women birthing children out of the context of marriage, the black-on-black violence sending young black men to graves, the breakdown of the family, and so on, are all moral problems that politics cannot fix. '

Things he can do.


22 posted on 10/09/2012 1:48:48 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

God hates child sacrifice. There was ONE time God did not forgive Israel and they were practicing child sacrifice. IT IS UNACCEPTABLE to Him and He will not forgive a nation for legalizing it. He did forgive Manasseh who repented, but not the nation of Judah. Reagan did not fix our shedding of innocent blood.

“However, the LORD did not turn from the fierceness of His great wrath with which His anger burned against Judah, because of all the provocations with which Manasseh had provoked Him. And the LORD said, “I will remove Judah also from My sight, as I have removed Israel. And I will cast off Jerusalem, this city which I have chosen, and the temple (house) of which I said, ‘My name shall be there’.”
“Surely at the command (mouth) of the LORD it came upon Judah, to remove them from His sight because of the sins of Manasseh, according to all that he had done, and also for the innocent blood which he shed, for he filled Jerusalem with innocent blood; AND THE LORD WOULD NOT FORGIVE.” (All caps mine) 2 Kings 23: 26 & 27 and 24: 3 & 4


23 posted on 10/09/2012 1:58:02 PM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

Best govt. is least govt.
One more thing, he didn’t take a lot of crap from anyone,


24 posted on 10/09/2012 2:08:31 PM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO) Hey Mitt, F-you too pal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
What Ronald Reagan did was to thoughtfully take care of business while at the same time he got out of the people's way.

He stayed out of most peoples way but he destroyed my family's business with a stroke of the pen when he deregulated the trucking industry. It helped the country as a whole but as with any legislation at the federal level there are always going to be some unintended consequences.

25 posted on 10/09/2012 2:25:44 PM PDT by houeto (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Reagan did........


26 posted on 10/09/2012 2:35:24 PM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (Where can I sign up for the New American Revolution and the Crusades 2012?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson