Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: xone
I already know humans can't pay for the forgiveness of sins

Indulgences have nothing to do with the forgiveness of sins.

Again, you fundamentally do not understand what Luther and Tetzel were arguing about.

43 posted on 11/02/2012 2:40:46 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: wideawake
The fraud sold forgiveness of future sins or to pay to have someone relieved of time in purgatory.

Since these are of no account, I don't really care what the Catholics say about indulgences/good/charitable works and their effects. The wares bought and sold during the time were for remittance of sin. Luther complained that if the money could remove someone from purgatory, why didn't the Church do it for free for everyone. Because debts needed paying, basilicas needed building and profit must be made off the rich and poor faithful in their ignorance.

47 posted on 11/02/2012 3:01:17 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson