Replies

Given the way polling data is careful to break black folks out as a separate religious group, there's really no way to get accurate data on how many Evangelicals, Independents, or any other category of Protestants voted for which candidate. Those black folks are theologically aligned with some block of Protestants, but rather than distributing them into those groups they just lump them into “Black Protestants” or some such. There are two black churches in this area who advertise that they're independent nondenominational Evangelical churches. Do you suppose they got counted as Evangelical voters or black voters?

That's why breaking down into groups and fighting one another over who is more “pure” does nothing except help keep people divided and unwilling to cooperate with one another to turn things around. If it suits the goals of the media and fascist democrats to include black folks in the Evangelical count, that's where they'll be in the polling data. If it suits the goals of those same folks to break them out separately, that's what they'll do.

I'm starting to think that's exactly the sort of categorizing numbers depending on the result you want that's behind reports of lower Evangelical and other Christian voter turnout.

The democrats are well versed in propaganda techniques and know exactly how to find the cracks they can drive wedges into in order to keep Christians divided and not cooperating. They also know which topics to constantly focus on so that they can suppress the number of their opponents that will bother to vote.