Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Adultery Can Result in Bastard Babies, Broken Marriages, Blasted Careers, and Baneful Diseases!
CSTNews ^ | November 20, 2012 | Don Boys, Ph.D.

Posted on 11/20/2012 9:21:01 PM PST by John Leland 1789

Most of today’s citizens don’t want any constraints upon themselves especially in the area of sex; however, whatever government does, God still holds everyone to a very high standard: all sex outside of a marriage relationship is sinful and will be faced one day. Apart from God’s judgment, adultery can result in bastard babies, broken marriages, blasted careers, and baneful diseases.

Adultery seems to be too much pain for so little gain! I wonder if General Patraeus thinks his roll in the hay was worth the destruction of his reputation, career, and maybe his marriage.

God has not rescinded the Old Testament law forbidding adultery. In fact, it was strengthened when Christ commanded, “But I say unto you, that whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart” (Matthew 5:28). He further said, “But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery” (Matthew 5:32).”

Apart from the Bible command, there are social reasons to prohibit adultery. One reason is because of paternity of children. If a wife is a cheat, how can a husband be sure that a child born to her is truly his? He should not be financially responsible for another man’s child. He also wants his estate to go to his own not another man’s child. Few sane people would disagree that sexual immorality has driven society to the cusp of the abyss, and it is in the best interest of everyone to have decent, caring, unselfish, and vow-keeping marriages.

Adultery is so serious, it is the only cause God permits as an excuse for breaking up of a marriage. It should be much more difficult to obtain a divorce, thereby forcing couples to solve their problems rather than breaking up a small civilization (the home) because of “irreconcilable differences” or “She’s a bad cook,” or “He keeps me awake with his snoring.”

I think it is astounding that any man would go to bed with a female not his own wife. When a man seeks sex from another woman, he often gets far more than he expected–such as syphilis and gonorrhea or even AIDS.

It is time for each state to reinstate adultery as a crime! Those who glibly say, “You can’t legislate morality” are “know nothings” since every law legislates someone’s morality. And yes, such a law would not be possible to enforce, but it would be a crime for anyone to have unmarried sex. That fact alone would keep some people from crossing the line into law-breaking.

With such a law it would make it easy to prohibit or prosecute those who would promote immorality especially to children, such as the Planned Parenthood pamphlet that was given to school children: “Sex is fun, and joyful…and it comes in all types and styles, all of which are OK. Do what gives pleasure and enjoy what gives pleasure and ask for what gives pleasure. Don’t rob yourself of joy by focusing on old-fashioned ideas about what’s ‘normal’ or ‘nice.’ Just communicate and enjoy.” States should make such jerks criminals for corrupting children and promoting sexual immorality.

Adultery is already an offense in the U.S. military but it is not forbidden by the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). Adultery is usually prosecuted, if at all, under the General Article that “prohibits conduct which is of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces, or conduct which is prejudicial to good order and discipline.” Prosecution usually depends on the circumstances such as rank, publicity, background, and other considerations.

When General David Patraeus, although retired, admitted to adultery with his female biographer it brought discredit upon the military and himself. The knowledge by the world that he broke his vows to his wife of 35 years produced a loss of confidence in his military and intelligence capabilities. He destroyed his life, his career, and maybe his marriage because of adultery. Maybe a strict prohibition against adultery would have helped the general keep his zipper up. Loss of rank, retirement and brig time might also help with that. The consequences to society from adultery are great enough to add adultery as a crime in each state and use it as a tool against married people who break their marriage vows, unmarried people who live like barnyard animals, and politicians who expose themselves to blackmail by illicit sex.

The status of morality in America is shameful, shameless, and sad and it reinforces Madison’s statement in the Federalist Papers: “If men were angels, no government would be necessary.” We are not angels so some laws are necessary. And to critics who tell us that it is no one’s business what consenting adults do, we say, “Nonsense.” We already have laws restricting what consenting adults can do: drug use, watching child porn, conspiracy to commit crimes, bestiality, sadomasochism, suicide pacts, sodomy (in some states), etc.

Civilized nations have always accepted the Ten Commandments as part of their criminal code and if it should be illegal to steal and kill, why not restore adultery as a crime?

According to Plutarch, Demosthenes declared, “We keep mistresses for our pleasures, concubines for constant attendance, and wives to bear us legitimate children and to be our faithful housekeepers. Yet, because of the wrong done to the husband only, the Athenian lawgiver Solon allowed any man to kill an adulterer whom he had taken in the act.”

Killing a wife’s lover may be a little extreme but it was legal in Texas until 1974 to kill your wife and her lover if caught in the act of adultery. Many Texas and other state juries would still be reluctant to send a man to jail for “defending his honor” by killing his wife’s lover.

Whatever state governments do, adultery is still sin and making it a crime would label it as harmful to everyone.

(Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives, author of 14 books, frequent guest on television and radio talk shows, and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years. Three years ago, the second edition of ISLAM: America's Trojan Horse! was published, and his new eBook, The God Haters is available for $9.99 from www.thegodhaters.com. These columns go to newspapers, magazines, television, and radio stations. His other web sites are www.cstnews.com and www.Muslimfact.com. Contact Don for an interview or talk show.)

Copyright 2012, Don Boys, Ph.D.

"Like" Dr. Boys on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/CSTNews?ref=hl and http://www.facebook.com/TheGodHaters?ref=hl Follow Dr. Boys on Twitter at https://twitter.com/CSTNews

Pass it along if you agree!


TOPICS: Evangelical Christian; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics; Theology
KEYWORDS: adultery; donboys; homosexualagenda; moralabsolutes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last

1 posted on 11/20/2012 9:21:05 PM PST by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

I heard a sermon on adultery once and the Pastor ticked off a list of consequences a mile long. It was enough to make many a man squirm in his seat


2 posted on 11/20/2012 9:27:45 PM PST by A_Former_Democrat (Elections do have consequences, young people of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

It’s pretty sad when people try making up excuses for adultery, when God figured it was never okay.


3 posted on 11/20/2012 9:34:30 PM PST by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789
“But I say unto you, that whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart”

Didn't hurt Jimmy Carter.

4 posted on 11/20/2012 9:43:13 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

“How can I trust a man if his wife cannot?” - Harry Truman
“If your wife can’t trust you, why should I?” - Ross Perot


5 posted on 11/20/2012 9:55:10 PM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspiratr1

When he was still running EDS, Perot would run a report that would cross-reference employees of the opposite sex who had the same address, but weren’t married to each other. It was also known that if you stayed in a corporate apartment, cohabitation was a big no-no. The maids were instructed to look for any evidence of such activity.


6 posted on 11/20/2012 9:59:16 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

my question as always. what happens when one partner won’t offer any sort of sex for years upon years? Divorce? Even the Catholic church allows annulments under such conditions.


7 posted on 11/20/2012 10:29:39 PM PST by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

my question as always. what happens when one partner won’t offer any sort of sex for years upon years? Divorce? Even the Catholic church allows annulments under such conditions.


8 posted on 11/20/2012 10:29:53 PM PST by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP Poet
yes...the Catholic Church does allow for annulments for that....probably first they would suggest he/she get a physical, then counseling....

this is a two way street...my friend/co worker confided to me that her husband who is 60 is impotent...and she's afraid to suggest seeing a dr or using youknowwhat.....she's very upset about it because she is in very good shape and looks 20 yrs younger than her age of 60....

9 posted on 11/20/2012 10:39:54 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat
" I heard a sermon on adultery once and the Pastor ticked off a list of consequences a mile long. It was enough to make many a man squirm in his seat "

And sometimes the very preachers who preach against are the very ones guilty of it.... but let's not let the truth get in the way, they can't have that exposed.
10 posted on 11/20/2012 11:34:05 PM PST by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: A_Former_Democrat
" I heard a sermon on adultery once and the Pastor ticked off a list of consequences a mile long. It was enough to make many a man squirm in his seat "

And sometimes the very preachers who preach against it are the very ones guilty of it.... but let's not let the truth get in the way, they can't have that exposed.

There is a reason why the pharisees who wanted to stone the woman to death who was somehow conveniently caught in adultery dropped the stones when Jesus told them that he who is without sin cast the first stone.

It's because maybe ? Those very men who wanted to stone that woman were her clients....
11 posted on 11/20/2012 11:39:18 PM PST by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cherry

Please tell your friend, that marriage isn’t about “sex”, but about love, and fidelity to the oath taken for life.

I buried my beloved last spring, after 10 years of Parkinson’s Plus symptoms that seriously impaired not only our sexual relationship, but our emotional relationship.

Does that give me a pass on “youknowwhat”? I have no answer.

All I know is that vows are to be taken seriously, or else there is no meaning to marriage, other than an expensive party, trip, and accumulating stuff to impress the peer group.

I hope your friend/co worker has enough dignity to keep her personal life challenges out of the workplace, and that you have enough sense to politely tell her that such “sharing” is inappropriate in a work environment.

I managed, and she can too, and she should be kept at a distance, because she is already crossing the boundary of proper work ethics by discussing such a personal matter with you, no matter what her age.

That said, having traveled miles in her moccasins, I know the pain, the loneliness, and the urge to reach out for comfort and support.

The workplace is not the right environment, and you are not qualified.

Get her some phone numbers of skilled counselors. and tell her tt officemates are not the best at helping in such personal situations.

Wondering if you get my drift?

Might be wise to document things, and have witnesses for future encounters.


12 posted on 11/20/2012 11:39:23 PM PST by jacquej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

first, if you are having problems with one woman already, why do men think the solution to this is another woman?!? like any oter woman isn’t going to have their own problems, or that the dynamic between you two will never develop major problems??

second, if one can learn anything from affairs, they always end badly, and it always gets found out. and if it ends badly, often someone talks. to think you can pull off an affair shows just how stupid you are, and that you will fail at some point, and then everything’s over. and let’s not forget diseases. one in five adults has herpes. if they’re cheating with you who else have they cheated with. explain to your non-cheating spouse how they got herpes.

if you have internet and working hands, and feel the need to “cheat”, at least don’t ruin everyone’s lives around you.


13 posted on 11/21/2012 12:22:36 AM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

Obama has gay sex every week (whenever he goes ‘golfing’).

That’s adultery too.


14 posted on 11/21/2012 12:46:27 AM PST by agere_contra ("Government creates nothing" - Romney, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

I realize you didn`t write the headline, John, but..

Really? “Bastard” babies?

I`ve always had a problem with labeling the children from out-of-wedlock sex. The babies are the innocent parties here. How about “illegitimate” or “bastard” parents?


15 posted on 11/21/2012 2:20:47 AM PST by ScottinVA (I've never been more disgusted with American voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

I’m glad to hear that you know that the man who delivered this message is guilty of the sin that he spoke out against. After all, if one, five or ten pastors sin they are all collectively guilty. Don’t speak out against sin, after all, we’re all collectively guilty. If we don’t call it sin and outline the consequences, then I guess it’s okay. For the record, it sounds like the preacher didn’t condemn an individual, he just outlined the consequences. Do you think there are none?


16 posted on 11/21/2012 2:48:32 AM PST by Scoutdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

It can also result in alliteration.


17 posted on 11/21/2012 2:59:42 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Obama should change his campaign slogan to "Yes, we am!" Sounds as stupid as his administration is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP Poet
Even the Catholic church allows annulments under such conditions.

That is not correct. If a marriage was never consummated, then it is not a sacramental marriage, and can be recognized as "null." This is true, btw, if the "kind of sex" was contraceptive - because this is contra bonum prolis, and therefore the assocation was not a sacramental marriage. If either party never intended the association to be permanent or exclusive, then it is not a sacramental marriage.

If medical or psychological problems arise, resulting in sexual dysfunction, then medical or psychological help is in order. However, if the problems cannot be resolved - just as with any other medical or relationship problems - this is where you take "in sickness and in health, for better or for worse" seriously, or you're an oathbreaker.

18 posted on 11/21/2012 3:17:38 AM PST by Tax-chick (Are you getting ready for the Advent Kitteh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
And sometimes the very preachers who preach against are the very ones guilty of it.... but let's not let the truth get in the way, they can't have that exposed.

What bearing would that have on the truth of what the pastor spoke? It is not a Church of holy men, it's a Holy Church of sinners. The sober don't really need AA, do they?

19 posted on 11/21/2012 3:36:24 AM PST by ALPAPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

We have adultry, queerdom, partner swapping, group sex, teaching children how to wear condoms, teaching children the mechanisms of queerdom sex, etc. The sex laws in this country are written for barnyard animals. We are not an upright nation anymore. We have lowered ourselves to the barnyard droppings. And we expect God’s grace?


20 posted on 11/21/2012 4:23:01 AM PST by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA
Bastard is a legal definition. The logic is sound. If you have no family, and were raised as a bastard child, it was thought that placing that person in certain professions was a dangerous things.

To be quite blunt, they used to acknowledge you need a husband and bride to raise well adjusted kids.

It was also a check on such behavior for the next generation.

Did it punish the innocent party? Very much so. Did it serve as a check on such activity? Somewhat. Did it look at the reality of human nature? Definitely.

21 posted on 11/21/2012 5:14:54 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789
Besides, why settle for hamburger when you've got steak at home? Photobucket
22 posted on 11/21/2012 5:24:39 AM PST by Ronald_Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cherry

If they reached the age of sixty without attaining a level of trust and communication, then they deserve to end it asexual.

And why are they talking about this? Bad sign there too.


23 posted on 11/21/2012 5:30:41 AM PST by Vermont Lt (The dude abides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Thank you tax-chick.


24 posted on 11/21/2012 6:09:03 AM PST by JCBreckenridge (They may take our lives... but they'll never take our FREEDOM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
"And sometimes the very preachers who preach against are the very ones guilty of it.... but let's not let the truth get in the way, they can't have that exposed."

Let's say a corrupt cop in a little town sits at an intersection, just waiting. He lets his friends and family blow through the stop sign with impunity. If he doesn't like you or recognize you, he pulls you over and writes you a ticket for running the stop sign even if you came to a complete stop.

Does this make having a stop sign at an intersection is a bad idea?

25 posted on 11/21/2012 6:18:20 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

I wonder if General Patraeus thinks his roll in the hay was worth the destruction of his reputation


God said thou shalt not commit adultry, so it is wrong but how does it help us in general to make it a personal issue with Patraeus?


26 posted on 11/21/2012 6:31:34 AM PST by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

You’re welcome. If people disagree with the teaching of the Catholic Church, that’s their business, but I believe it’s my business as a Catholic to explain the teaching accurately, in appropriate situations.

Many commentators, including some of the Bishops, have observed that it’s difficult in our society for people truly to give consent to a sacramental marriage, because they can always have the reservation in mind, “... but I’ll divorce you if ...” you get fat, you get old, you get sick, I don’t get all the sex I want, I develop new interests, etc.

In that sense, a declaration of nullity might recognize that a spouse’s consent to the marriage was conditional, “as long as I get sex when I want it,” and therefore there was no sacramental bond.


27 posted on 11/21/2012 6:31:41 AM PST by Tax-chick (Are you getting ready for the Advent Kitteh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GOP Poet

my question as always. what happens when one partner won’t offer any sort of sex for years upon years? Divorce? Even the Catholic church allows annulments under such conditions.


So do the JV,s but The Bible says different.


28 posted on 11/21/2012 6:34:54 AM PST by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

I would suggest rephrasing it to “if I don’t get the support when I need it”. Most divorces these days are initiated by women, not the men fwiw.

I believe it’s the duty of the husband to care for his wife and ensure that her needs are met, and the same for the wife. Begging off because, “you have a headache”, isn’t any less hurtful than if the husband were to say, “you’re fat”. The more women who learn this, the happier their marriages.


29 posted on 11/21/2012 6:51:29 AM PST by JCBreckenridge (They may take our lives... but they'll never take our FREEDOM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA
"bastard" has a correct dictionary definition. It does not describe the character of the child, but refers to the character of the relationship which brought the child into this world.

You have to get over or around the seeming popular, gutter-ized use of the word.

30 posted on 11/21/2012 7:22:18 AM PST by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf
" . . . so it is wrong but how does it help us in general to make it a personal issue with Patraeus?

See post number 5 in this thread.

When anyone chooses to be a public figure, their trustworthiness, by default, is judged by their actions.

31 posted on 11/21/2012 7:36:51 AM PST by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

Any failure of reasonable care for your spouse is a sin against charity and should be repented and corrected. However, no matter what the failure is - and every spouse will fail, often, because we are all sinners - a “marriage vow that has conditions,” stated or unstated, is not a marriage vow. If either spouse says out the outset, “We can get divorced if ...” or “I consider adultery justified when ...”, there is no marriage, period. Also if either spouse says, “We will not have children,” or “We will have only ## children.”

This is simply the definition of Christian matrimony, straight from the Catechism.


32 posted on 11/21/2012 8:41:33 AM PST by Tax-chick (Are you getting ready for the Advent Kitteh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

More people need to hear these words. Thanks again!


33 posted on 11/21/2012 8:43:36 AM PST by JCBreckenridge (They may take our lives... but they'll never take our FREEDOM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

You’re welcome ... I’ll be here all week, please tip your server!


34 posted on 11/21/2012 10:16:50 AM PST by Tax-chick (Are you getting ready for the Advent Kitteh?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

Around 10% of children are born to a father other than the one who is told he is the father.


35 posted on 11/21/2012 10:24:09 AM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP Poet; cherry
As to annulments in the Catholic Church, the teaching is that a valid marriage consummated by an act of intercourse creates a marriage bond which cannot be broken by anything but death.

There can be no annulment of a valid marriage, because an annulment is a finding of nullity, that is, a finding that there never was a valid sacramental bond to begin with. Refusal to have intercourse later on down the line may be a monumental injustice, but it is not grounds for annulment.

(A civil divorce is possible, but this does not imply a right to remarry while the spouse is still living.)

36 posted on 11/21/2012 10:34:47 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Point of information.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cherry

Viagra is perfectly legitimate for the treatment of impotence. Impotence needs therapeutic intervention. It is not grounds for annulment.


37 posted on 11/21/2012 10:37:05 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Point of information.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA
Exactly right. There are illegitimate parents, not illegitimate babies.

BTW the word "bastard" does not exist in canon law. Such a child is just called one's "natural child."

38 posted on 11/21/2012 10:40:08 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Point of information.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf
The Catholic Church does not allow annulments for marriages when, at some point, one of the spouses refuses, or becomes incapable of, intercourse. If it was a valid, consummated marriage ab initio, the bond is until death.
39 posted on 11/21/2012 10:46:33 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Point of information.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

The unreasonable refusal of either spouse to have intercourse, is a sin against marriage. The word “unreasonable” should be considered seriously. Under “normal conditions,” the spouses ought to accommodate each other’s reasonable sexual desires. It goes right along with love, respect, kindness, peace, and justice.


40 posted on 11/21/2012 10:52:24 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Point of information.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
"Around 10% of children are born to a father other than the one who is told he is the father."

Is that a statistic for the United States?

If that is true, and I don't doubt, it can only bring very deep confusion to the country in the long run, and certainly God will withhold His holy hand from blessing the nation that has taken this course in its morality.

I lay a very great share of the blame and responsibility upon the "Christian" churches in our land which preach only what men want to hear, and not the Truths of God from His Word. Mere civic clubs they have become !

41 posted on 11/21/2012 11:52:00 AM PST by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789
That was a commonly quoted rate, as seen by geneticists who were in charge of tracking down genes through family trees. They would often find (around 10%) that people were not actually descended from the father who they were told was the father. They kept quiet about it - to the family - but went around saying “10% of people are not born to who they think is their father”.

Scientific studies of such seem to be more around 4% or so. Not sure why there is such a discrepancy - but 4%, although still high, seems more reasonable.

One can tell by relative human testes size that there is some “competition” to establish paternity. It seems somewhat ‘hard wired’ in human nature. Not that one shouldn't strive to overcome such animalstic urges.

42 posted on 11/21/2012 12:05:07 PM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

See post number 5 in this thread.
See post number 5 in this thread.
When anyone chooses to be a public figure, their trustworthiness, by default, is judged by their actions.


See post #5, nope, will not do that, some one else told me to see so and so post, i could not find the numbered posts as computers are not exactly the best of my talents.

I was hammered for being too stupid to count, this would not have happened 50 years ago, it would have been face to face and there would have been an ass whipping, maybe mine but that would be beside the point.

I have no argument in the political sense as it could cause security problems.

But other wise it is between Him and God, if you read the scripture that tell about the woman caught in adultery and brought to Jesus and he told them ( those with out sin first cast a stone )

This seems to put the people who are doing the hammering of Patraeus in the same place as the scribes and Pharisees and puts Patraeus in the place the woman who committed adultery was in, Jesus said nothing good about the scribes and Pharisees.

I doubt that either position is a good one to be in where our Lord is concerned, we can not be the opposite of every thing Jesus says to be and be his followers.


43 posted on 11/21/2012 1:35:58 PM PST by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

The Catholic Church does not allow annulments for marriages when, at some point,


I don,t know much about the Catholic church, i did go to the J.W,s a few times, thanks.


44 posted on 11/21/2012 1:38:53 PM PST by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

The Catholic Church does not allow annulments for marriages when, at some point


I also meant to say that i do not believe in divorce, except that if a person who is not a believer wants to leave the believer is to let them go.

Two believers are not to do so because if they are really believers they are also capable of and believers of forgiveness.


45 posted on 11/21/2012 1:44:30 PM PST by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf

That’s right.


46 posted on 11/21/2012 1:56:15 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o ("It is rational to believe, as it is our very existence that is at stake". - Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Rightwing Conspiratr1

Truman would get kicked out of the Democratic party for a statement like that today(and for his support of Israel).


47 posted on 11/21/2012 5:53:56 PM PST by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf
I will quote Reply # 5 for you here :

“How can I trust a man if his wife cannot?” - Harry Truman

“If your wife can’t trust you, why should I?” - Ross Perot

The comparison between the General and the woman taken in adultery in the Gospel of John ch. 8 would work if the woman with whom the General was committing adultery was one of the principle attackers of the General, seeking his stoning.

Otherwise, using Scripture against the clear commands of Scripture is a device from the Satanic bag of tricks (Matthew ch. 4 ; Luke ch. 4), taught by liberal churches to liberal professing Christians ; a device to make sin seem less sinful.

48 posted on 11/22/2012 5:32:42 AM PST by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ravenwolf
I will quote Reply # 5 for you here :

“How can I trust a man if his wife cannot?” - Harry Truman

“If your wife can’t trust you, why should I?” - Ross Perot

The comparison between the General and the woman taken in adultery in the Gospel of John ch. 8 would work if the woman with whom the General was committing adultery was one of the principle attackers of the General, seeking his stoning.

Otherwise, using Scripture against the clear commands of Scripture is a device from the Satanic bag of tricks (Matthew ch. 4 ; Luke ch. 4), taught by liberal churches to liberal professing Christians ; a device to make sin seem less sinful.

49 posted on 11/22/2012 5:32:42 AM PST by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: John Leland 1789

The comparison between the General and the woman taken in adultery in the Gospel of John ch. 8 would work if the woman with whom the General was committing adultery was one of the principle attackers of the General, seeking his stoning.


You seem to be assuming that the scribes and pharisees are the ones who the woman was committing adultery with, maybe i have missed it but i see no such evidence.


50 posted on 11/22/2012 6:42:31 AM PST by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson