An Ever-Changing College... Ever More, Benedict's Supermajority (Surprising Stats!)

Whispers in the Loggia ^ | November 26, 2012 | Rocco Palmo

[NYer]

Much as last weekend's events highlighted the reality in the elevation of the two youngest members – by far – of the Pope's Senate (and, in time, the electorate that'll choose his successor), a 2010 analysis long ago set the stakes for what's now upon us....

Already, in the red hats he doled out in March 2006 and November 2007, the pontiff has named thirty -- that is, at least a quarter of his successor’s eventual electorate -- so restoring the “papal senate” to its voting maximum would give Papa Ratzinger 42% of “his” cardinals in the electoral college, the remainder named by John Paul II.

But here’s where it really gets interesting. Between now and the end of 2012, at least an additional 23 seats will open up just on account of electors “aging out.” The result: within seven years of his own election, B16 will have an unfettered hand to choose not just a majority of the voting College, but a contingent just shy of the two-thirds necessary to elect the Roman pontiff. What’s more, while John Paul II -- who repeatedly broke with Paul VI’s 120 limit, once ballooning it as high as 135 -- tended to name his cardinals significantly older, especially toward the end of his reign, as of today Benedict’s additions to the scarlet tide have an average age of just over 68 -- a figure bound to fall considerably once the new class takes its seats.

This rapid turnover of the College presents the specter of a scenario that could end up being a rather pointed last word on John Paul’s legacy: the distinct -- and, with time, ever-growing -- possibility that one of Karol Wojtyla’s chosen cardinals will never don the papal white.....

*   *   *

So, that was then... and two years later, the master-count now stands at 53 electors chosen by John Paul, to 67 by Benedict. 

On age-outs alone – read: barring deaths – fifteen more voting slots will open by the end of March 2014, giving Joseph Ratzinger the potential of filling at least 82 seats in a hypothetical Conclave by that point. (For the less numerical, that's all of 15 months away.)

In an electoral college numbering the statutory maximum of 120, a supermajority of 80 – two-thirds, without the former plus-one – is required to elect a Pope. Should no new red hats be made by then and the dreaded, rightly fearful need arise, the requisite margin to pick Peter's successor would be 70 or less.

That said, it bears recalling how, at February's intake – clearly seeing the number of impending vacancies ahead – a Papa Ratzinger who had previously been a rigid follower of Paul VI's 1975 Conclave-cap expanded the potential electorate to 125 cardinals, a full eleven of whose spots would come open before the most recent Consistory was held, before quickly being replenished in this go-round. 

In other words, as Popes get older, they tend to get bolder... and over the next 18 months, even more than usual, anything is possible.

[NYer]

within seven years of his own election, B16 will have an unfettered hand to choose not just a majority of the voting College, but a contingent just shy of the two-thirds necessary to elect the Roman pontiff.

That definitely puts me more at ease; how about you?

[Mrs. Don-o]

I like it. I like it.

[Vide]

I'd heartily recommend John Julius Norwich's history of the papacy: Absolute Monarchs. it brings the process to life when you read of the schisms and wars caused by contested papal elections in the past.

Post-election depression drove me back to Gibbon, but, on reflection, America's fall is much closer to the erosion of the papacy, or the decline and collapse of the Byzantine empire.

Despite whatever the Chinese curse may say - the times feel more disappointing than "interesting".

[Heart-Rest]

It puts me more at ease too!

I hope in the future he also picks more to elevate like Archbishop Chaput of Philadelphia, and none like Cardinal Mahony.

[Heart-Rest]

Mrs. Don-o, your tagline sent me to youtube to find these old song renditions.    (Sorry!!!)    :-)

     You're Sixteen, You're Beautiful, And You're Mine - Johnny Burnette

     You're Sixteen, You're Beautiful, And You're Mine - Ringo Starr

(Maybe you could re-write ALL of the lyrics to this old song to "elevate it" a bit, and make it match up with your "(He's xvi, / He's beautiful, / And he's mine.)" tagline, which contains a much more inspiring sentiment than this original old song.)

[Mrs. Don-o]

Ooh, you walk down the aisle,
Scholarly smile,
Doctrine that's really defined:
You're Sistine
You're pontifical
And you're mine.

Well, they can't all be jewels.. :o0

[Heart-Rest]

That is great!    (And it is fitting.)

(Now you have to sing it, and record it, then put it out on youtube...)

Maybe you could call it, "Vita-Man B-16"!

☺

[Not gonna take it anymore]

I love your tagline.

[ArrogantBustard]

heh heh heh ...

Splendid.