Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barna: Romney Got Lowest Level of Evangelical Support Since Bob Dole
Christian Post ^ | 12/07/2012 | Napp Nazworth

Posted on 12/07/2012 12:49:23 PM PST by SeekAndFind

Mitt Romney, the Republican nominee for president this year, received the lowest level of support among evangelicals of any Republican presidential candidate since Bob Dole in 1996, according to a report by Barna Group, a Christian polling organization.

Romney received the support of 81 percent of evangelicals, compared to 88 percent for John McCain in 2008, and 83 percent and 85 percent, respectively, for George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004. Only Dole received a lower level of evangelical support at 74 percent in Barna's polling.

Barna's results differ from other polls showing Romney received a higher proportion of the evangelical vote than McCain. The exit polls for the National Election Pool, for instance, showed Romney getting a share of the white evangelical vote that was four percentage points higher, 78 to 74 percent, than McCain. The differences can be explained, though, in how "evangelical" is defined for the different polls.

In the National Election Pool, an evangelical is simply one who self-identifies as evangelical or "born again." For Barna, an evangelical is defined by a set of theological beliefs.

A "born again Christian," in Barna's categorization, is one who has made a personal commitment to Jesus Christ that is still important to them today and who believes that they will go to Heaven when they die because they had confessed their sins and accepted Jesus Christ as their savior.

An "evangelical" meets all those criteria plus affirms an additional seven theological beliefs consistent with evangelical doctrine. These include questions about proselytizing, the existence of Satan, salvation through grace, the divinity of Christ, the authority of scripture, and God's omnipotence, omniscience and omnipresence. "Born again" and "evangelical" are not dependent upon worship attendance or denomination.

Barna's other religious categories include "notional Christians," who identify as Christian but do not meet the born again criteria, "other," who belong to a non-Christian religious group, and "skeptics," which includes atheists, agnostics and those with no religious faith.

Under those categories, Barna's research shows that Romney only won the evangelical vote, 81 to 17 percent, and the non-evangelical born again Christian vote, 56 to 43 percent. Combining those categories, Romney won among all born again Christians, 60 to 39 percent.

President Barack Obama won among notional Christians, 57 to 41 percent, other religious groups, 69 to 30 percent, and skeptics, 68 to 28 percent.

The survey of 1,008 adults, including 771 voters, was conducted Nov. 6-10. The margin of error for the sample of voters is plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.


TOPICS: Current Events; Evangelical Christian; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012analysisreligion; 2012electionanalysis; 2012electionanalyst; barna; elections; evangelicals; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

1 posted on 12/07/2012 12:49:29 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Ok, did he receive a high level of support or a low level of support, and why the heck are people trying to spin this, unless they are not on our side?


2 posted on 12/07/2012 12:51:50 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; jmaroneps37
Romney received the support of 81 percent of evangelicals, compared to 88 percent for John McCain in 2008, and 83 percent and 85 percent, respectively, for George W. Bush in 2000 and 2004. Only Dole received a lower level of evangelical support at 74 percent in Barna's polling.

Capturing 81 percent of the evangelical vote is hardly something to cry about. But let's not forget the crap that Kevin "coach" Collins was peddling the day after the elections, when he claimed that (and I quote)

Evangelical Christians may not be evil people, but they helped an evil president become an evil dictator on Tuesday. The exact numbers aren’t in but clearly the vast majority of Evangelicals stayed home on Election Day.

3 posted on 12/07/2012 12:58:07 PM PST by Alex Murphy ("If you are not firm in faith, you will not be firm at all" - Isaiah 7:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What all these people fail to mention is that Obama didn’t get as many votes in his second term election as in his first. One has to wonder who dropped off of which I have seen no analysis?


4 posted on 12/07/2012 12:59:19 PM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Yet Obama got 98% of the black evangelical vote.

We had better stop this religious schism crap.

We are supposed to draw folks in, not kick them out over single issues.


5 posted on 12/07/2012 12:59:32 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

What I find shocking is that he didn’t get the support from fellow Mormons—Obama got his Blacks—but the Mormons could bother to get off their tails and cast a vote for Mitt. They deserve what dish of humble pie Obama serves them.


6 posted on 12/07/2012 12:59:32 PM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade
Same source:

"Evangelicals turned out in record numbers and voted as heavily for Mitt Romney yesterday as they did for George W. Bush in 2004," said Ralph Reed, chairman of Faith and Freedom Coalition. "That is an astonishing outcome that few would have predicted even a few months ago. But Romney underperformed with younger voters and minorities and that in the end made the difference for Obama."

7 posted on 12/07/2012 1:02:22 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Evangelicals must prefer an atheist in the WH.Who wouldda thunk?
8 posted on 12/07/2012 1:11:06 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Benghazi: What Did Baraq Know And When Did He Know It?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

On the one hand, FReepers and other conservatives warned that nominating Romney would increase the “sit it out” quotient among conservative voters.

On the other hand, of course it is disappointing that more conservatives did not turn out EVEN for Romney, GIVEN the horror of the alternative (and the very real risk that the MSM will stick the blame somehow on REPUBLICANS for 8 years of Obama failure).

I just hope it wasn’t The Mormon Thing.


9 posted on 12/07/2012 1:17:15 PM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade

Maybe a sizeable chunk of self-described Mormons are Harry Reid Mormons now. Who knows?


10 posted on 12/07/2012 1:19:21 PM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pogo101

I can’t understand why, but someone is trying to spin me. I wish an “evangelical” (whatever that is) would stop by and explain.


11 posted on 12/07/2012 1:23:24 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

The information does seem to be in conflict. I’m confused too.


12 posted on 12/07/2012 1:27:35 PM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pogo101

I couldn’t even find the post-election article (from the same source), that claimed “evangelicals” turned-out in record numbers for Romney. The disparity in accounts is glaring.


13 posted on 12/07/2012 1:31:24 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade

We know what the black preacher Rev Wright taught in his church and since 95% of black church people voted for Obama, we know what kind of Christian beliefs they have. What are their black preachers teaching them - to hate crackers?


14 posted on 12/07/2012 2:19:29 PM PST by YukonGreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Why should that stat be any surprise??

If the amount of anti-Mormon vitriol that was posted here on FR was any indication, I’m surprised he got that much support.

I bet all you “true Christians” are really glad you dodged a bullet there, right? I mean what could be worse than a Mormon in the White House? Oh, wait.........


15 posted on 12/07/2012 2:31:11 PM PST by MDspinboyredux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The election was there for the taking. All the GOP had to do was not nominate Obama-lite. They couldn't be counted on even that much.

Total and complete losers.
16 posted on 12/07/2012 2:35:51 PM PST by Antoninus (Sorry, gone rogue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

RE: All the GOP had to do was not nominate Obama-lite

OK, which of these folks would have defeated Obama?

Michele Bachmann
Herman Cain
Newt Gingrich
Rick Santorum

For those who don’t know, Bachmann almost lost her seat this year. She hang on by a TINY number and eked out a slim victory.


17 posted on 12/07/2012 2:41:08 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Only 58% of Hoosiers who were registered to do so bothered to vote. I’m ashamed but it is an indicatore neither party motivated its members.


18 posted on 12/07/2012 2:46:40 PM PST by hoosierham (Freedom isn't free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Any of the above could have beaten Obama with a unified and energized party behind them. But we'll never know, will we? We nominated the weakest link instead thanks to the "geniuses" in Republican media establishment.

Morons all.
19 posted on 12/07/2012 3:05:47 PM PST by Antoninus (Sorry, gone rogue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Any of the above could have beaten Obama with a unified and energized party behind them. What a stupid a$$ed comment. ANY of our candidates, even Romney, would have won with a unified and energized party. But since your candidate, a one-term Senator who LOST his re-election bid, didn't win you picked up your ball and went home. Rather than being unified behind a set of values, we have become factionalized supporting individuals instead of ideas. Please reflect on your priorities this January 21st.
20 posted on 12/07/2012 3:40:24 PM PST by MDspinboyredux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Gee, who would think moral voters would stay home for a muslim and an occultist who in the past was pro-abortion, pro-gay, pro-tax and spend and pro-gun control until he decided to run nationally.

Or, cold it be, that the leaders of the stupid party are just to stupid to learn from past mistakes....

I think by now after Bush I, Dole, and McCain even people with such low I.Q's as the rino leaders of the Republicans could see if you want your base to come out and vote for you, you first have to give them something to vote for.

Republicans are not the dem party who vote for a party. Republicans actually think and have principles and if you do not give them the principles they think this party stands for then what it the point of voting for this party??

This election we had a choice of a communist muslim and a democrat occultist. During a year republicans could have won everything, they CHOSE to lose because they want to be liked at the Washington parties they go to.

When was the last time a Republican president came from the liberal North East???? Yeah, real hard to figure out what the real possibility of the election results were going to be....so let's blame evangelicals who vote morals and we know from history every time we put up a rino they stay home. Yeah, let's do the one thing guaranteed to make them stay home them blame them. I am sick of the idiotic argument. What logical person could put the blame on their shoulders and not the sick rino leaders of the party. You better bend our way or we will vilify you....ugh. Childish.

21 posted on 12/07/2012 3:46:25 PM PST by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lady Heron
Republicans are not the dem party who vote for a party. Republicans actually think and have principles and if you do not give them the principles they think this party stands for then what it the point of voting for this party??

Presumably you'll be right there at the forefront when a "Purity Party" is formed,a party that will accept nothing less than "perfection" in all ways.Of course the formation of that Party will ensure a President Hillary,a President Mosschelle Obama,a President Michael Moore,a President Sandra Fluke and a President James Earl Carter IV.Among others.

Keep one vital fact in mind...Jesus Christ HIMSELF could not be elected President of the United States today.Think about that...long and hard.

22 posted on 12/07/2012 4:12:10 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Benghazi: What Did Baraq Know And When Did He Know It?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Well, let’s play spin the religious vote again, kiddies! We just looove that game, we could play it over and over and over again! Sooo, here goes!

The Evangelical vote was “low” at 81%, and Republican Presidential candidate Romney made no effort to woo them, but ...

The Catholic vote was “high” at 48% with many attempts to woo them culminating in the selection of a Vice Presidential candidate who is Catholic, and the ticket didn’t even win the VP candidate’s home state ...

And then we have Presidential candidate Romney’s own religious group, the Mormons, whose support was lower than Evangelicals!

What are we to conclude? Catholics are anti-Mormon? No, they just have baggage, it’s sooo hard to break their lifelong Democrat habit, nevermind the Evangelicals went pretty much cold turkey with Reagan.

Mormons are anti-Mormon, lol?

Nooo, of course not. But, bloviating on about anti-Mormon Mormons cannot possibly be any more schizophrenic than repeatedly banging their heads upon reality, trying to pin this loss on Evangelicals.

What Evangelical stronghold state did Romney lose? What Catholic stronghold state did he win?

There are an awful lot of painful contortions going on here, in order to avoid concluding that the Catholics lost this election for Romney.

There, I said it. Post a hundred yard screed or three, parse the language to death, find some minor subset of the group that looks a little better for apologia sake. Par for the course on FR these days.

It’s still denial.


23 posted on 12/07/2012 4:36:39 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Presumably you'll be right there at the forefront when a "Purity Party" is formed,a party that will accept nothing less than "perfection" in all ways.

This is the straw man of all straw men. None of us were looking for "Purity".

The Presidential candidate recieving my vote must meet one test. He or she must have a track record of moving the political football toward the Conservative goalpost. Sarah Palin has that record.

Did Romney meet that standard? Enough of this "perfection" straw man crap ok?

24 posted on 12/07/2012 4:46:21 PM PST by SpeakerToAnimals (I hope to earn a name in battle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
There are evangelicals who would not vote for someone who is a member of a cult, and no matter how you spin it, Mormonism is a cult.

But instead of blaming the evangelicals, why not put the blame squarely where it belongs; on the GOPe for,

1. giving us another candidate who was not going to be able to get the base out to vote and,
2. did every thing they could to diss the base.

Romney was and always will be a very liberal member of the GOP, who's record is not much different from Obama, and as I mentioned above, not a true Christian. He was just the next person who felt they were next in line to try and win the presidency, just like Dole & McCain.

That's not being judgment or hateful, that's just stating a fact.

25 posted on 12/07/2012 5:05:13 PM PST by ducttape45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ducttape45; SpeakerToAnimals
Just FYI...Osama Obama and Michael Moore (among many others) stain the front of their underwear (if ya catch my drift) when they read stuff like this.
26 posted on 12/07/2012 5:18:36 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Benghazi: What Did Baraq Know And When Did He Know It?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

Yes, no other voter block - not even the Mormon’s - voted so overwhelmingly as while evangelicals, so they must be to blame!


27 posted on 12/07/2012 6:20:18 PM PST by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry; metmom; boatbums; caww; presently no screen name; smvoice; HarleyD; HossB86; ...

Worthy saying again:

Well, let’s play spin the religious vote again, kiddies! We just looove that game, we could play it over and over and over again! Sooo, here goes!

The Evangelical vote was “low” at 81%, and Republican Presidential candidate Romney made no effort to woo them, but ...

The Catholic vote was “high” at 48% with many attempts to woo them culminating in the selection of a Vice Presidential candidate who is Catholic, and the ticket didn’t even win the VP candidate’s home state ...

And then we have Presidential candidate Romney’s own religious group, the Mormons, whose support was lower than Evangelicals!

What are we to conclude? Catholics are anti-Mormon? No, they just have baggage, it’s sooo hard to break their lifelong Democrat habit, nevermind the Evangelicals went pretty much cold turkey with Reagan.

Mormons are anti-Mormon, lol?

Nooo, of course not. But, bloviating on about anti-Mormon Mormons cannot possibly be any more schizophrenic than repeatedly banging their heads upon reality, trying to pin this loss on Evangelicals.

What Evangelical stronghold state did Romney lose? What Catholic stronghold state did he win?

There are an awful lot of painful contortions going on here, in order to avoid concluding that the Catholics lost this election for Romney.

There, I said it. Post a hundred yard screed or three, parse the language to death, find some minor subset of the group that looks a little better for apologia sake. Par for the course on FR these days.

It’s still denial.


28 posted on 12/07/2012 6:22:39 PM PST by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mylife

I’m not sure what a black Evangelical is, but where is the breakdown of the black vote, which denominations, and are you sure that it was 98% of black “Evangelicals”? what was the percentage for the atheist blacks, the non-Evangelical, and which churches do they belong to?

How did Evangelical Hispanics vote?

How did non religious whites vote? 75%, 85% Obama?


29 posted on 12/07/2012 9:57:11 PM PST by ansel12 (The only Senate seat GOP pick up was the Palin endorsed Deb Fischer's successful run in Nebraska)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

While Evangelicals are the most right wing voters in America, people like you are massively, overwhelmingly Obama voters, you voting republican makes you something of a rarity, yet who do you attack?

You are one confused boy.


30 posted on 12/07/2012 10:03:38 PM PST by ansel12 (The only Senate seat GOP pick up was the Palin endorsed Deb Fischer's successful run in Nebraska)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Romney shaped the 2012 and the 2008 primary field in 2006.


31 posted on 12/07/2012 10:05:29 PM PST by ansel12 (The only Senate seat GOP pick up was the Palin endorsed Deb Fischer's successful run in Nebraska)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MDspinboyredux
Why should that stat be any surprise?? If the amount of anti-Mormon vitriol that was posted here on FR was any indication, I’m surprised he got that much support. I bet all you “true Christians” are really glad you dodged a bullet there, right? I mean what could be worse than a Mormon in the White House? Oh, wait.........

After your childish post, can you name any group that voted more for the Mormon, than the Evangelicals?

Why don't you post the figures for the anti-christian vote, the atheist vote? They are so massively left wing, that they vote almost precisely opposite of the Evangelicals, usually in the 75 to 85% democrat column.

32 posted on 12/07/2012 10:12:01 PM PST by ansel12 (The only Senate seat GOP pick up was the Palin endorsed Deb Fischer's successful run in Nebraska)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry; SeekAndFind
What Evangelical stronghold state did Romney lose? What Catholic stronghold state did he win?

There are an awful lot of painful contortions going on here, in order to avoid concluding that the Catholics lost this election for Romney.

Thanks for getting to the real point behind this nonsense.

We are always being sold the false idea that Roman Catholics and their church are conservative. If we were ever going to see this play out in an election it would have been this year. The obamacare mandates obviously violate their religious freedom and their church hierarchy was prety clear that they did not support obama. Yet, a majority of Roman Catholics voted for obama.

Evangelical Christians were pretty much disregarded by the Pubs and yet voted for the Pubs in huge numbers (81%).

I think this election teaches that the "Catholic vote"is a demographic that conservatives should ignore. Rather they would be better served to pursue sub sets of this vote such as blue collar workers, young marrieds, and Hispanics.

33 posted on 12/08/2012 1:13:21 PM PST by wmfights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212; RegulatorCountry; metmom; boatbums; caww; presently no screen name; smvoice; HarleyD; ..
I agree.

Moving this discussion in a different direction, my Pastor gave a great message after the election. He acknowledged that the culture is lost. However, he made the uplifting point that Christianity grows under persecution. His example was China. When Mao marched into Red Square it was widely believed that in China there were less then 150,000 Christians. Now we believe there are at least 100 million Christians in China.

I think as everyone is trying to find firm ground to stand on after this election one thing is clear. There really is no point in watering down our beliefs. We should stand firm in our faith and witness to the lost even as we are condemned as "intolerant and insensitive" for doing it.

34 posted on 12/08/2012 1:27:24 PM PST by wmfights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: wmfights; RegulatorCountry; 1000 silverlings; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; caww; ...

Look what happened in the USSR. Decades of unbelievable persecution, and now they have more spiritual freedom and growth occurring that we’re permitted and see.


35 posted on 12/08/2012 2:26:59 PM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Yep, so can we blame the evangelicals for our dim-wit president? For once — just for once?


36 posted on 12/08/2012 2:30:11 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: metmom; wmfights; RegulatorCountry; 1000 silverlings; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; ...
Look what happened in the USSR. Decades of unbelievable persecution, and now they have more spiritual freedom and growth occurring that we’re permitted and see.

You might want to check into the rise of the church-state connection in Russia between the Orthodox and the State. Evangelicals, especially Baptists, have been running into a lot of problems. However, the good side is even with the state persecution Evangelicals are growing in number.

FWIW, I think we are entering into another dark period for the world with the rise of ruling oligarchies and decreasing freedom for individuals.

37 posted on 12/08/2012 2:51:56 PM PST by wmfights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

Yeah, I know it isn’t all roses. I know there are churches here in the US which are actively engaging opening Bible schools and teaching and equipping new church leaders over there in the event that they should lose that freedom again.

There’s a feeling of haste about it, but in the meantime, it is going forward.

Technology is going to allow for a control and monitoring of people on a global scale that is going to make it very difficult for those who don’t comply.


38 posted on 12/08/2012 2:59:27 PM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: metmom; wmfights; RegulatorCountry; 1000 silverlings; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; ...

I wish I could agree more, but while there is more freedom than than in the Cold War, but with the Russian Orthodox, being largely institutionalized as Rome, and having State sanction, evangelical churches are once again being persecuted.

See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/2958299/posts and links in 1st post.


39 posted on 12/08/2012 3:13:54 PM PST by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MDspinboyredux
ANY of our candidates, even Romney, would have won with a unified and energized party. But since your candidate, a one-term Senator who LOST his re-election bid, didn't win you picked up your ball and went home.

No, I have said since 2007 that I would not support Romney under any circumstances as he is no better than a democrat and would accelerate the liberalization of the GOP. Many other conservatives said likewise. But you morons, in your smarter-than-thou wisdom, decided to nominate him anyway and, as this article indicates, the bum got the smallest evangelical turn-out since 1996.

Enjoy four more years of Obama. And in 2016, if you decide to nominate another moderate loser, you can count on repeated doses of the same medicine.

If you want our support, nominate a conservative.
40 posted on 12/08/2012 6:12:14 PM PST by Antoninus (Sorry, gone rogue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Satan is growing in power and he holds the members of Christ’s church in his palm. There should be a large group against the Democrats from the churches. All you here is silence.


41 posted on 12/08/2012 6:15:24 PM PST by bmwcyle (Women reelected Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle

Satan has no more power than he ever did. All he has is deception and more people are bowing to lies/deception because they are not grounded in Truth. God says if one asks for wisdom they will receive it. I don’t see much wisdom either. But I know there are many who do have eyes are ears to see and hear that do HIS WORK and not the work of the world.

But this election showed how many have taken the wide road to destruction and they won’t learn what they need to know with the MSM, the voice they listen to.


42 posted on 12/08/2012 9:19:36 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: mylife
Yet Obama got 98% of the black evangelical vote. We had better stop this religious schism crap.

Their blackness comes first before God. And that is their problem not ours. Some have worked through that race mindset; many choose not to do that.

God is first with conservatives and if you think that is crap go join them because so do they.

43 posted on 12/08/2012 9:47:48 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

We live in the age of deception described in the Bible.


44 posted on 12/09/2012 5:08:50 AM PST by bmwcyle (Women reelected Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212; metmom; wmfights; RegulatorCountry; 1000 silverlings; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; ...

Thanks for the link, informative.


45 posted on 12/09/2012 8:34:59 AM PST by wmfights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: MDspinboyredux

ALL of the Republican candidates sucked, every single one of them.


46 posted on 12/09/2012 8:36:43 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative; Lady Heron
Keep one vital fact in mind...Jesus Christ HIMSELF could not be elected President of the United States today.Think about that...long and hard.

Jesus doesn't run for President of the U.S...He appoints the President of the U.S....moving human's wills to accomplish His own.

I challenge your "vital fact", in that my God is not in the least as weak as the God you make Him out to be.

47 posted on 12/09/2012 2:08:01 PM PST by uptoolate (Republicans sure do like their liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Barna has been studying evangelicals and other religious groups for many years. Exit pollster commentators and/or analysts don’t necessarily have that religious background to make their comments relevant.


48 posted on 12/09/2012 2:16:49 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All






Can't you just imagine the above was the scene with Obama and his Commie staff after stealing the election through voter fraud- while Conservatives blame Romney, argue, point fingers, blather on about who to run in four years, 'starting a new party', and try to figure out how to suck up to minorities the 'next time'?

Next time? What makes you think the massive voter fraud in this last farce of an election won't be repeated? If we don't clean up our voting system, there may not be a next time. We may not see another Republican president in our lifetime


Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Map from Barack Obama Voter Fraud 2012


What most refuse to acknowledge is that it was unlikely that ANYBODY could have beaten the voter fraud planned and perpetrated by the Obama machine. They seem to prefer pointing fingers, blaming Romney and blathering on about who to run in 2016 and how to suck up to the minorities.

>Polls indicated that Romney was going to win the election.

>The economy is close to Great Depression era conditions, and unemployment is almost as high as when Obama entered office.

>Economic conditions became so dire after Obama took office it prompted the rise of an entire new movement, the Tea Party.

>Presidents rarely win reelection when the economy is in the tank.

>Mitt knew it too, when he was met by several thousand in that parking garage cheering him when he arrived unannounced at that airport, and he put his hand over his heart and said, 'This is how you know you've won'.

So how did Romney lose a race that numerous reputable polls and pundits predicted would be an easy win, based on historical patterns?

Massive voter fraud.

That and no other reason

Almost every major Conservative website has put out an article charging voter fraud- Breitbart, American Thinker, Atlas Shrugs, WND, The Blaze, Front Page Magazine, Fox News, The Daily Caller, Town Hall, Human Events, Canada Free Press...


We can not wait for 2014 and 2016 to regroup and figure out new strategies. By then it will be too late. The Marxist/Muslim usurper will have completed his planned distruction of America. That's what people fail to understand.

We must act NOW.

Start with the election. If we let the Rats get away with this massive voter fraud, we're no better than a bananna republic.

We must keep digging and pounding him every day, in every way we can- phony birth certificate, Benghazi, Fast and Furious, his hidden life, records....




___________________________________________________



Col Allen West; "I don't want to see America become like Zimbabwe where people don’t trust their electoral process. If we cannot trust the integrity of the voting system then we are no longer a free republic".

Col West has opened the door.

We must fight election fraud.

It falls on ‘We the People’.

Silence is consent

___________________________________________________


The website,'Barack Obama Vote Fraud 2012' is keeping a running account of cases of voter fraud and what to do about it:

Visit the site- Here

(Astonishing!)




_________________________________________________



Believe it or not, there ARE patriots out there who are going to FIGHT Obama's reelection- unlike the spinless Republicans who remain silent!

Visit the website; 'The Competent Conservative'

Here

'These elections are NOT certified yet. The only way to get this investigated, much less recounted or overturned, is through the Secretary of State of each of the five key states: Florida, Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. EVEN IF YOU ARE IN ANOTHER STATE you can help. But it won’t do any good to dilute our effort to challenge California or Michigan or other states. Until a major group gets involved to do more, here is the plan: Contact the Secretary of State of the state in question. See contact information below... '





Visit the website, 'Halt Voter Fraud':

Here

'This election is not over - YET. Obama has not been elected by the Electoral College - YET. The Presidential election is being stolen from us with "Chicago Style" thuggery - and we can STOP the thieves in their tracks. But we do not have time on our side. This is our LAST chance. Don't give up. We must act now.

If massive voter fraud has occured as alleged by so many, and if the state vote counts include these FRAUDULENT votes, then is it logical to say that the entire state vote is COMPROMISED and can't be trusted? 59,000,000 Americans might agree!

The state vote is used to determine the allocation of Electors in the Electoral College which actually elects the President and Vice President.

If the vote count is FRAUDULENT, FLAWED, and CAN'T BE TRUSTED - and if the Electors have been FRAUDULENTLY allocated based on FLAWED vote counts - then WE CANNOT ALLOW THE GOVERNORS TO SIGN THEIR CERTIFICATES of ASCERTAINMENT on December 17th. We can stop this if we ACT IMMEDIATELY.

***** CALL TO ARMS ***** FIVE STATE CAPITOLS ***** SEVEN DAYS *******

Patriots must rally NOW in the State Capitols of Harrisburg,PA - Richmond, VA - Tallahassee, FL - Columbus, OH, and Madison, WI ****** MASSIVE RALLIES ** *** PATRIOT LEADERS ORGANIZE YOUR LOCAL EFFORTS NOW, coordinate with the other PATRIOT groups as they also rally, let us know who you are and how you will respond, how we can help.

Remember the Battle of Trenton?

We can make HISTORY TODAY.'

More- Here

___________________________________________________


Obama Voter Fraud on FaceBook- Here

___________________________________________________



Sign this petition- almost 117,000 and counting -cards, email- Here

Sign the ‘We The People’ petition. It has 60,000 signatures and counting- Here

Click and sign the petition for a recount Here-

___________________________________________________

CANADA FREE PRESS: Here

WND List of voter fraud reports Here
ATLAS SHRUGS voter fraud list. Here


Republican pole watchers; busloads of Somalians brought in Here
Another poll watcher observes voter fraud Here

Hannity and Col Allan West slam voter fraud Nov 12- Here

Photo of SOMALIANS brought to Ohio voting stations by the busload, 95% of whom did not speak English, and told to vote for Obama, straight Dem ticket- Here

'Human Events', report pollwatcher eyewitness to busload of Somalians at Ohio poll, spoke no English, told to vote Obama Here

__________________________________________________

Must watch videos!

VIDEO-- Programmer Testifies About Rigging Elections With Vote Counting- Here

VIDEO- Illegal Aliens Caught Voting and Stealing Elections In Florida In Vast Numbers- Here

VIDEO- MICHAEL SAVAGE: How Obama fixed the 2012 election- Here

VIDEO- Massive voter fraud discovered in April- Here

VIDEO- Whistle blower speaks out about voter fraud- Here



============================================

Voter fraud from Tea Party: Here

The American Dream- 22 Signs That Voter Fraud Is Wildly Out Of Control And The Election Was A Sham: Here

Town Hall : Obama Likely Won The Election Through Voter Fraud: Here

American Thinker: Was The Election Stolen:? Here

WSVN-TV Almost 1K Ballots Found In Broward Elections Warehouse: Here

Pundit Press; In Florida Obama Got Over 99% In Broward County Precincts: Here

Natural News.com: 19,605 to Zero IS Statistical Proof Of Outright Vote Fraud in 2012 Presidential Election: Here

Realville, USA: The Great Election Robbery of 2012? Here

WND: Here's How Touchscreens Killed Romney Votes: Here

The American Dream: Election Fraud? Obama Won More Than 99% Of The Vote in More Than 100 Ohio Precincrs: Here

WND: The Big List Of Voter Fraud Reports: Here

Nachum's List of Voter Fraud: Here

MORE:

Newt Gingrich 360: Here

Appalachian Forums: Here

Before It's News: Here

WND: Here

Political Outcast: Here

True The Vote: Here

Fox News Insider: Here

Human Events; Here

The Will County News: Here

Fox News: Here

WND: Here

Townhall: Here

Breitbart Here

Accuracy In Media The Left's national voter fraud strategy exposed: Here

Thousands of military votes uncounted or missing: Here

Human Events: Here

Front Page Magazine: Here

The Blaze Here

The Daily Caller: Here

Front Page Magazine Here

Military Voter Protection Project: Here

BreitBart Here

Townhall: Here

Fox News Here

The Blaze Here






__________________________________________________

The best Obama Exposure site on the net, The Obama File: Here

The United StatesLibrary of Congress has selected TheObamaFile.com for inclusion in its historic collection of Internet materials Here





49 posted on 12/09/2012 5:58:24 PM PST by patriot08 (NATIVE TEXAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

They prefer to have the Anti-Christ be in the White House, they are going to be raptured out anyways, before even one hair on their pretty heads is touched, they figure, it might as well be sooner then later. Can’t get that nice hair-do messed up.


50 posted on 12/10/2012 6:49:59 PM PST by rodeo-mamma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson