Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom
"That bit of nonsense?

No one accepts the PoJ as inerrant, but is is not entirely in inaccurate and no one claims that it was not written in the second century when the practices, customs, and traditions of Judah and the Galilee would have been reflected in it. You are of course free to construct your understanding from what is not said in Scripture, but those of us who are sincere in understanding the meaning and intent of Scripture look the available historical and linguistic records for proper context.

Peace be with you

48 posted on 12/09/2012 3:40:30 PM PST by Natural Law (Jesus did not leave us a Bible, He left us a Church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Natural Law

“No one accepts the PoJ as inerrant,...”

And yet is is cited in opposition to Holy Scripture. Odd that.


49 posted on 12/09/2012 3:44:28 PM PST by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson