Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/15/2013 9:53:19 AM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: marshmallow
It also turned down an appeal by a nurse whose hospital barred her from wearing a cross around her neck. In the fourth case in the verdict, a British Airways clerk suspended for wearing a cross won her appeal and was awarded damages.

The stupidity of pretending that a nurse with a cross is somehow different from a clerk with a cross is striking. The evil of pretending that the invented "right" of a homosexual not to have their feelings hurt by encountering normal people who reject their choices is even worse.

2 posted on 01/15/2013 9:58:20 AM PST by Pollster1 (Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marshmallow
It also turned down an appeal by a nurse whose hospital barred her from wearing a cross around her neck. In the fourth case in the verdict, a British Airways clerk suspended for wearing a cross won her appeal and was awarded damages.

So a nurse wearing a cross is bad, an Airways clerk wearing a cross is ok....

3 posted on 01/15/2013 9:59:16 AM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson