Posted on 01/25/2013 7:53:36 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
If a woman can and will perform at the same level as a man, under current requirements, then have at it.
Still, I cant help thinking that I’d have her in the corner of my eye as I fought for our lives and the emotion of seeing a woman hurt or dead wouldn’t be destructive to my psyche as I fought on and maybe cost more lives, including my own for the distraction.
If she’s 100% Lesbian and can fight as well as any other man that will, hopefully, not be an issue.
If she’s a hot azz lesbo I’d be conflicted ....
You mean soldiers don’t just drive the tank and pull the lanyards?
On quick fires on the 155, I would remove one of the 220 pound spades, and take it to the hole and hold it while it was pinned, and I would do this by myself to free up an extra digger, it saved us valuable seconds.
Back then we were naive enough to think that a quick fire was to get some lead in the air to save a unit that was being overrun, to let the enemy know that the air was going to become deadly within seconds and to break their focus and confidence, to turn the tables, I guess today, mixed units are more important than that kind of thing.
I just can’t see females contributing to a quick fire, or even being able to perform it at all, in an acceptable length of time.
Here is the problem. What happens when female combat soldiers are captured raped and tortured on camera? What if they have kids? What will the political and propaganda impact of that video image on the public?
The following are examples of banners held by women in 1917, demanding sufferage:
Her key point is that those who advocate this say that the only way the women in the military can rise to flag rank is by getting their ticket punched in a combat role. However, the physical stress of extended combat deployment will affect women far more, likely leading to early retirements.
Im not concerned about the individual women. I am concerned about the impact of their mutilation on the over all policies of national interest. When the media show children that their mothers are blown to pieces. and say... “ should we be fighting this war...” and the camera turns to the 4 year old ans says... “why is my mommy dead?”
Yer Mammy is dead because she suffered from Kuhrazy Bitchitis that afflicted her with delusional thoughts of Grandeur, thinking she was the equal of a man....
That’s why they call them “Loveboats’’.
Of course. The true liberal agenda is to ultimately weaken the U.S. military and allow our enemies to defeat us.
Ever see the movie “Doctor Zhivago”? The title character’s half-brother was a communist ordered to enlist during WWI to help bring about the Bolshevik Revolution from the remains of Russia’s defeat by Germany. It’s the same principle. Undermine from within like parasites.
There will never be a female Navy Seal or Army Ranger, UNLESS standards are lowered to they can pass the strength and stamina requirement. Facts are fact. A 13 year old, 120 boy is stronger than the average full grown woman. The boys HS shotput and discuss record is longer than the Women’s Olympic Record. The boys high school 100 yard dash record is faster than the female US Olympic record. Liberals love to ignore reality.
I think libs know the reality - they intend to destroy the effectiveness of our military.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.