Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Contraceptive Insurance Mandate Faces Change [religious organizations will be able to opt out]
WCVB Boston ^ | 2/1/13

Posted on 02/01/2013 7:49:54 AM PST by marshmallow

WASHINGTON (CNN) —Religiously affiliated organizations will be able to opt out of providing their employees with insurance coverage for contraceptives under updates to an Obama administration mandate that the Department of Health and Human Services is expected to unveil on Friday, according to two sources.

In March, after an uproar among religious institutions that didn't want to pay for contraceptives, the Obama administration offered several policy suggestions that would require the administrator of the insurance policy, not the religious institution or the insurer, to pay for contraception coverage and invited comment on those proposals.

The administration is expected to detail how it will handle two of the more controversial situations, said a source familiar with Friday's announcement.

"Religiously affiliated organizations will be given the option of exempting themselves from the requirement of providing their employees with contraceptive access or service that they are morally opposed to," said the source.

A spokesman for the Heath and Human Services Department refused to comment on the expected policy announcement.

(Excerpt) Read more at wcvb.com ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Moral Issues; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 02/01/2013 7:50:00 AM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
This won't help Hobby Lobby.

They have to keep fighting.

2 posted on 02/01/2013 7:52:45 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (TYRANNY: When the people fear the politicians. LIBERTY: When the politicians fear the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

So Sibelius can just ‘update the mandate’ which was part of a law passed by Congress? Why do they get to fix it around the edges?


3 posted on 02/01/2013 7:54:08 AM PST by Kanzan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Conscientious objector” has been around since our beginnings. This is no different....and is applicable to an individual.


4 posted on 02/01/2013 8:00:15 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

That’s not good enough. Any employer needs to be able to opt out. Contraception is not “health care”. It doesn’t prevent or treat a disease.


5 posted on 02/01/2013 8:05:08 AM PST by Campion ("Social justice" begins in the womb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

All the focus on religious objections to Obamacare overlooks the larger ECONOMIC LIBERTY rights crushed by Obamacare.

If I do not want to by brown beans, I shouldn’t be compelled to buy brown beans. My view can be based on religious motivations or willy nilly motivations.


6 posted on 02/01/2013 8:07:19 AM PST by mbarker12474 (If thine enemy offend thee, give his childe a drum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
“Conscientious objector” has been around since our beginnings.

That was when we were a nation of laws.

We are now a nation of fascists.

7 posted on 02/01/2013 8:10:26 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (TYRANNY: When the people fear the politicians. LIBERTY: When the politicians fear the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Shouldn’t this be titled, “Obama Caves”?

Jes sayin’. That’s what they say about Republicans every time they give up a point.


8 posted on 02/01/2013 8:28:57 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kanzan
So Sibelius can just ‘update the mandate’ which was part of a law passed by Congress? Why do they get to fix it around the edges?

Something rotten in the state of . . .

9 posted on 02/01/2013 8:40:31 AM PST by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Doesn’t help individuals who are still forced to subsidize abortifacients and sterilizations through higher insurance premiums and taxes.


10 posted on 02/01/2013 8:46:06 AM PST by PeevedPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

To prefer a Catholic organization over the owner of Hobby Lobby is a violation of the Equal Protection clause and is completely unacceptable. [Note: I personally have no objection to the use of birth control, but I have a huge objection to this flagrant and unforgivable violation of the First Amendment and of the underlying human right.]


11 posted on 02/01/2013 8:46:27 AM PST by Pollster1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

You are right... all individuals ( business owners included) should be able to exercise their religious freedoms, and hobby lobby and other businesses must keep fighting. This is true regarding issues of contraception as well as freedom of speech regarding the “normalization” of gay rights and other social issues.

This is however a victory for the catholic church ( and all denominations who have fought the mandate.) The US bishops just last week stated they would go to jail over this mandate. They have steadfastly fought this mandate without backing down, a show of courage and faith the administration more than likely didn’t expect. Keep it up. Truth will win when men and woman have the courage to proclaim it.


12 posted on 02/01/2013 8:48:55 AM PST by longfellowsmuse (last of the living nomads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kanzan

Sebellius can “update the mandate” because the law is written to give partisan appointees like her (with zero accountability to the electorate) that kind of power to issue regulations. This is why the phrase “government takeover of healthcare” is accurate. Bureaucrats are now in charge of what coverage you can purchase. Where you can purchase it. How much you pay for it. And ultimately the treatment choices available to you.


13 posted on 02/01/2013 8:50:53 AM PST by PeevedPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Then what the samhill was the Sandra Fluke kerfluffle about last spring? I thought it was an element of the Republican War On Women. I guess that Sebelius is waging a Democratic War on Women herself by this action.

As an aside, Limbaugh’s over-the-top attack on Fluke played into the Demoncrats hands by reinforcing the War On Women meme. His attack was ill-conceived and ill-waged.


14 posted on 02/01/2013 8:50:59 AM PST by bagman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeevedPatriot

Do not comply!

Mass non-compliance.

Stand together. Or hang separately.


15 posted on 02/01/2013 9:16:46 AM PST by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: bagman

As an aside, Limbaugh’s over-the-top attack on Fluke played into the Demoncrats hands by reinforcing the War On Women meme. His attack was ill-conceived and ill-waged.

**
I have been very suspicious of his motives ever since. He is much too savvy and experienced to do such a thing out of ignorance. Makes me wonder....

As for Fluke, I don’t want to pay for her birth control, but I would be willing to pony up for some shampoo for her, as she always looks to be in need of it.


17 posted on 02/01/2013 10:49:17 AM PST by Bigg Red (Restore us, O God of hosts; let your face shine, that we may be saved! -Ps80)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red

Interesting point you make regarding Limbaugh’s motives.

I suspect that he cost Romney more than a few votes by his conduct with regard to Fluke.


18 posted on 02/01/2013 12:19:09 PM PST by bagman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: longfellowsmuse
This is however a victory for the catholic church...

Actually, now that I have reread the article, it's not. Ubama didn't give an inch. They still have to provide contraception/abortion services through a "third party."

Lying scumbags, all.

19 posted on 02/01/2013 1:24:30 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (TYRANNY: When the people fear the politicians. LIBERTY: When the politicians fear the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I agree, guess I jumped the gun. I wonder what the Bishops will do. I won’t hazard a guess either way.


20 posted on 02/01/2013 3:03:53 PM PST by longfellowsmuse (last of the living nomads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson