Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: mgist

The elected person always takes another name. He would not take the name Peter. BTW, I don’t believe he will be selected — too socialistic.


14 posted on 03/10/2013 3:44:38 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Salvation

I do not believe so either that Cardinal Peter Turksman will be elected, not only because of what you had said, but also his name wast touted a lot by the news media over the last few weeks. That is not good.

My best guess is these 3 but again this is my best guess: Tagle, Rajaith, or Burke.

Overall let the Holy Spirit do HIS WORK.


16 posted on 03/10/2013 3:50:02 PM PDT by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation

In the movie and I assume the novel “Shoes of the Fisherman,” Cyril actually does take the name Cyril.

But it would take quite a bit of hubris, or realization that these are the end times, for a Pope Peter II.

As I recall, John Paul I actually called himself “Johanne Paulo Primo” (I remember the Primo part - I assume the rest was in the ablative)....but the other one-of-a-kind popes — have no number.

I wonder, is the “1st” assigned proleptically except in the case of JPI?

There’s probably no way to know — the last one-of-a-kind was Pope Lando (A.D. 913-914); the last 1st was Marinus I (882-884), with Marinus II serving 942-946?


32 posted on 03/10/2013 5:15:25 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson