Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Barnhardt on Pope Francis
Barnhardt.biz ^ | March 14, AD 2013 | Ann Barnhardt

Posted on 03/15/2013 4:55:42 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

On Francis
Posted by Ann Barnhardt - March 14, AD 2013 10:34 AM MST

Let me start with a positive comment. Remember, this is the best I could come up with:

If we had gotten the pope we DESERVE, we would now have Pope Snoop Dogg.

And thus ends the positivity.

Francis, like his homeland of Argentina, is a total disaster. He has overseen the near-total destruction of the Church in Argentina. He hates and despises the Tridentine Mass, which is to say that he hates the Mass - let's not mince words, and is a rabid persecutor of anyone in Argentina who shows ANY signs of tradition. A priest in Argentina literally risks the end of his career if he wears a cassock in public. He has forbidden the Tridentine Mass in Argentina, which is an act of direct disobedience, specifically against the papal decree Summorum Pontificum, but embraces horrific "charismatic" and "Superfun Rockband"-type liturgical sacrilege.

Which brings us to his regard for the papacy, and the Church itself. He said yesterday in his bizarre little speech, again and again, that he was the Bishop of Rome, which is true, but in being the Bishop of Rome the pope is the head of the Universal Church, not just the city of Rome. Francis does not believe this, and even made a reference to the idea that the pope is "first among equals". This means that he regards the Church as a mere loose confederacy, and also that he thinks the Church is, or should be, a democracy. The proof of this is, again, his blatant disobedience to Summorum Pontificum. He will never do anything to clean up the sodomite infiltrators in the Church outside of Rome because he doesn't feel that the pope has any authority outside of Rome. Bottom line here: many bishops and archbishops have been kept in line over the past eight years because Benedict was relatively aggressive in booting out extremely bad bishops. Benedict was feared in a healthy way. This guy is basically the big green light to every Marxist-homosexualist to just go ahead and do whatever, because they know Francis will never remove them or even chastise them, because Francis doesn't believe that the pope has any universal authority and is merely the bishop of the city of Rome proper - at least that is the excuse that will be given when nothing is done about abuses and heresies **that Francis is sympathetic towards.**

BUT, like all insecure leaders who say that they reject authority and obedience, reports from Buenos Aires are that he is an iron-fisted totalitarian against traditionalists, precisely because he has no confidence in or respect for his own authority, and thus assumes that no one else does either, and thus wields power against his perceived enemies only from brute force. Again, this is TEXTBOOK 20th century Marxist worldview and psychology. It is also the diametrical opposite of the virtue of MEEKNESS, which is power under control.

Next, he is an "ecu-maniac", which is to say that he is in the "all religions are equal and can't we all just get along" camp. In Buenos Aires he knelt before and received the "blessing" of a Superfun Rockband Church "pastor", and even received "communion" from a Protestant. There are pictures floating around of that episode. This is terrifying. He clearly does not have a strong belief in or understanding of Our Lord, His Church, the Mass or the Real Presence of Our Lord in the Eucharist. But, as I have stated repeatedly, almost none of the men ordained in the 1960s, 70s or 80s do.

Next, he's a Jesuit. Now, I must disclose that I have a deep personal, seething, visceral hatred of Jesuits, but my hatred of them is a corollary to the fact that they long ago descended into truly evil heresies and apostasy. Jesuits, in addition to being a cult of sodomites who hate God, are also … wait for it … Marxists. Now Francis has in the past put up some token resistance to so-called "Liberation theology", which is just Communist Totalitarianism in religious drag, but he is huge, huge, huge on "social justice", which is merely code for Marxism. This guy's worldview revolves around giving people free stuff because it's nice, which as we have discussed is contrary to logic and reason, specifically in the subset of mathematics, and thus is contrary to Our Lord who is but FIRST the Logos, with the Divine Caritas (charity) proceeding out of the Logos. Bottom line, there will be zero positive assistance to the world from Francis with regards to the inevitable economic collapse. Not only will there be nothing helpful coming from him, he will almost certainly come out in favor of more debt, more "free stuff", and more rhetoric about how people are "entitled" to physical and service commodities (which are someone else's man-hours, remember) as "rights".

But Ann! He has gone on record against homosexual "marriage" and abortion!

Wow. Is this really how far we have sunk? The Roman pontiff is on record as being against sodomy and killing babies and we cite this as proof of ORTHODOXY? Really? I wonder if he also believes in gravity. Does belief in gravity constitute a conservative worldview now?

Benedict thought that between the "Natural Solution" (the passage of time yielding the death or retirement of the bad guys) and the appointments he was able to make over the last eight years that he had set up the College of Cardinals to elect a successor that was very much in the Ratzingerian camp. Benedict was wrong. Not only did they not elect a Ratzingerian, they elected the anti-Ratzinger. In the 2005 conclave Francis came in second to Ratzinger, which is to say that Francis was the "opposition". In what must have Benedict's mind reeling today, after eight years of purging and priming the College of Cardinals, the very men Ratzinger placed turned around and elected the anti-Ratzinger. This proves, as I have said all along, that playing prevent defense, namely the "natural solution" of waiting for the bad guys to die is UNSOUND. In war, you fix your bayonets, say your prayers, and you charge.

Tridentine Mass-goers and clergy, this guy will be on the warpath against us at some point. Prepare. Brace. He may attempt to undo Summorum Pontificum either directly or through intense passive aggression. Any hopes of reconciling the good guys in the SSPX is now totally over. Beyond that, the splinter factions will now claim that "they were right", and sadly even more schism will result, and more people will remain outside the Church. So sad.

We got what we deserved, and probably better than we deserve. God's chastisement of His people is sending them bad priests, bishops, and now, in all likelihood, a bad pope. What do you expect? Look around. The world is awash in staggering sin and blasphemy and no one will lift a finger to do anything about it. And, as my last essay on penance proved via my email box, no one is sorry or has any desire to make reparation to Our Lord for any of it. No one has the slightest comprehension of the notion of taking on the burden of guilt for sins that they didn't directly commit, which blows my mind because that is LITERALLY the ENTIRE POINT of the Incarnation. The mind reels at the collective obtuseness needed to miss that glaring point.

No one has the slightest comprehension of the idea of seeing Our Lord in agony and simply stepping over to Him and asking, "What can I do to help You? What can I do to make You feel better? Let me take some of Your burden. Let me go with You."

Nope. So long as we all leave Him alone in His Passion, He will leave us to our self-absorption and indifference.

Kyrie eleison. Christe eleison. Kyrie eleison.

Viva il Papa.


TOPICS: Catholic
KEYWORDS: alteredtitle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
...This guy is basically the big green light to every Marxist-homosexualist to just go ahead and do whatever, because they know Francis will never remove them or even chastise them, because Francis doesn't believe that the pope has any universal authority and is merely the bishop of the city of Rome proper - at least that is the excuse that will be given when nothing is done about abuses and heresies **that Francis is sympathetic towards.**

He has forbidden the Tridentine Mass in Argentina, which is an act of direct disobedience, specifically against the papal decree Summorum Pontificum, but embraces horrific "charismatic" and "Superfun Rockband"-type liturgical sacrilege...

...Tridentine Mass-goers and clergy, this guy will be on the warpath against us at some point.

...This guy's worldview revolves around giving people free stuff because it's nice, which as we have discussed is contrary to logic and reason, specifically in the subset of mathematics, and thus is contrary to Our Lord who is but FIRST the Logos, with the Divine Caritas (charity) proceeding out of the Logos. Bottom line, there will be zero positive assistance to the world from Francis with regards to the inevitable economic collapse.

Pope Ubama I.

1 posted on 03/15/2013 4:55:42 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

From so great an authority as Ann Barnhart.............


2 posted on 03/15/2013 4:58:23 PM PDT by basil (basil, 2ASisters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil

Alinsky tactics from so great an authority on them as basil.


3 posted on 03/15/2013 5:00:02 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Somebody has to be courageous enough to stand up to the bullies." --Dr. Ben Carson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

She really seems to have gone around the bend.

Hey, Ann, I don’t much like the Novus Ordo either. But did you expect the new Pope to reverse everything since Vatican II on his first day in office?

Calm down.


4 posted on 03/15/2013 5:07:01 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Who cares what she thinks. We didn’t ask for her opinion. It’s not worth the paper she printed it on. Ann, who are you? Go back to your hole.


5 posted on 03/15/2013 5:08:09 PM PDT by sgfan1212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
He hates and despises the Tridentine Mass

This seems to be the trigger point to most of the people I see who hate him (other than libs). Why all the OCD over this one version of the Mass that almost paints him like the AntiChrist himself for not liking it?

6 posted on 03/15/2013 5:08:30 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

She has seemed to have been losing it since she shut her business down. Shen then went full tax protestor and starting having everything seized.


7 posted on 03/15/2013 5:09:16 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I can’t read it.

The only person I know who regards her rants, which may be on the nose one time out of ten, is a despised, raging, bipolar bookshop owner, who is correct about once out of ten times.

Methinks Ann is disappointed they did not consider her.


8 posted on 03/15/2013 5:12:03 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: mnehring

Oh, they reject Vatican II. They can either get over it or not. who cares, indeed.

Anyway, and just by the way, the Novus Ordo in Latin is beautiful, esp with traditional music.


10 posted on 03/15/2013 5:14:04 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Who?


11 posted on 03/15/2013 5:15:50 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

He took immediate and decisive action on Cardinal Law today. Cloistered indeed.


12 posted on 03/15/2013 5:17:18 PM PDT by Ingtar (Everyone complains about the weather, but only Liberals try to legislate it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I could do with an honest questioning of the Pope’s past actions but this makes Ann sound like the Westboros.


13 posted on 03/15/2013 5:20:51 PM PDT by dragonblustar (Allah Ain't So Akbar!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I am not a Catholic, but I was definitely not pleased to hear that this Pope was a South American Jesuit. That is, after all, the root of Liberation Theology (aka Christianized Marxism). I found it worrying the moment I heard his claim to fame was “social justice”. I’m sorry, but when the Catholic church starts talking “social justice” it often/usually means support for big government social welfare liberalism.

When Ratzinger was named Pope I was confident and happy with the news - and I know almost all political conservatives of all faiths felt the same way. This time, not so much. People are putting a brave face on and talking up the good things about this new leader, but I think on the economic issues Pope Francis is a big question mark so far. I absolutely admit that I could be totally wrong, but even the chance that the Catholic church could move further left on economic positions is just very unwelcome news.


14 posted on 03/15/2013 5:20:55 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: basil
No one has the slightest comprehension of the idea of seeing Our Lord in agony and simply stepping over to Him and asking, "What can I do to help You?

Start by resisting the temptation to publish obnoxious screeds such as this.

15 posted on 03/15/2013 5:22:57 PM PDT by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Jesuits, in addition to being a cult of sodomites who hate God, are also … wait for it … Marxists. Now Francis has in the past put up some token resistance to so-called "Liberation theology", which is just Communist Totalitarianism in religious drag, but he is huge, huge, huge on "social justice", which is merely code for Marxism.

If you wanted to raise as many flags as possible, among as many groups of outsider observers as possible, especially for some end time prophecy fans, that pretty much covers everything.

16 posted on 03/15/2013 5:25:07 PM PDT by GBA (Here in the Matrix, life is but a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

What a nutcase. Lies, distortions and general involuntary commitment material.

Cardinal Bergoglio was in compliance with Summorum Pontificum within 48 hours.

There are around 6-8 Tridentine Mass locations in Argentina including the one in Buenos Aires.

It is possible that restoring traditional liturgy isn’t his #1 interest, granted.

Looking forward to assisting at my Latin Mass on Sunday...


17 posted on 03/15/2013 5:26:01 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by Nature, not NurtureĀ™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlatherNaut
Start by resisting the temptation to publish obnoxious screeds

Amen! Someone who refuses to display even a modicum of Christian charity isn't someone I'm going to take too seriously as an authority on Christian matters!

This woman needs prayer. It's hard to imagine someone who writes this kind of venom having much peace inside.

18 posted on 03/15/2013 5:29:17 PM PDT by PeevedPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: steve86

Yep, you kind of figured she had completely lost it when she called Jesuits “a cult of sodomites who hate God”.


19 posted on 03/15/2013 5:30:02 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: logitech
No one has the slightest comprehension of the idea of seeing Our Lord in agony and simply stepping over to Him and asking, "What can I do to help You? What can I do to make You feel better? Let me take some of Your burden. Let me go with You." Nope. So long as we all leave Him alone in His Passion, He will leave us to our self-absorption and indifference.

Unbelievably unscriptural PING! (as if WE can "help" Jesus at the cross. Hint: He did it ALL Himself, and He does not "need" our pitiful help)

20 posted on 03/15/2013 5:31:02 PM PDT by WXRGina (The Founding Fathers would be shooting by now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson