Sounds like you would never be able to make a decision as a juror or a judge, as to the guilt or innocence of the accused. No amount of evidence would be good enough for you. Suit yourself.
The Shroud is either a fake; real and the image of Christ; or real and the image of someone else. The scientific evidence shows, beyond a reasonable doubt, that it is not a fake. It is also extremely unlikely that it is the image of someone else.
If you think there is evidence it is a fake, then lay it out. I am really curious as to what that evidence is.
You are the second person to post to me that believing in the authenticity of the Shroud is the same as believing in global warming. It is actually quite the opposite. Global warmers ignore and or cherrypick evidence to support their claim and that is exactly what the Shroud skeptics have been doing on so many of these threads.
I have read several shroud threads and posted to many, and I have not yet seen any well reasoned argument against the authenticity of the shroud, in full consideration of the evidence available. Maybe you will be the first?