Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12
when the most prominent(sic) Catholics in America,

Heretics are notorious not prominent. You'd be well served to take an elementary vocabulary class and learn the meaning of the words you attempt to use.

20 posted on 04/12/2013 10:56:54 PM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro can't pass E-verify)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: A.A. Cunningham

Websters will do, “”readily noticeable : conspicuous. b : widely and popularly known “”

Sane people would call the Vice-President of the United States and the ex-Speaker of the House who is now Minority Leader, and both well known Catholics and who just took communion at the Vatican prominent.

You’d be well served to take an elementary vocabulary class and learn the meaning of the words you attempt to twist into some kind of self serving gibberish.


21 posted on 04/12/2013 11:05:08 PM PDT by ansel12 (The lefts most effective quote-I'm libertarian on social issues, but conservative on economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: A.A. Cunningham
The heretics were prominent enough at the Papal Mass.

It was a preeminent opportunity for the Pope to establish his seriousness on the issuance of communion to those KNOWN to be at variance with Church policy.

But he didn't.

He consciously allowed the apostasy to go forward, thus signaling his OWN COMPLICITY in its continuance.

It's difficult to assess exactly, how Catholicism is going to be able to crawl out of this hole when the Pope himself is digging it ever deeper.

26 posted on 04/13/2013 7:42:44 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson