Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

I’m in complete agreement that Roman Catholics are entitled to define themselves on their own terms, so why the lashing out at “Protestants” when dealing with your own behaving disobediently?

It’s disingenuous and misleading. Why? Is there some fear that the secular world might figure out that there is actual disagreement in the ranks, as if a bunch of sedes fanning out onto internet forums to bellow about Vatican II isn’t already doing that?

Stop slinging mud at potential allies, is my suggestion.


9 posted on 04/28/2013 9:32:39 AM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RegulatorCountry
It’s disingenuous and misleading.

Incorrect. It's an accurate definition, your thin skin notwithstanding.

1 prot·es·tant noun \ˈprä-təs-tənt, 2 is also prə-ˈtes-\

1 capitalized

a: any of a group of German princes and cities presenting a defense of freedom of conscience against an edict of the Diet of Spires in 1529 intended to suppress the Lutheran movement

b: a member of any of several church denominations denying the universal authority of the Pope and affirming the Reformation principles of justification by faith alone, the priesthood of all believers, and the primacy of the Bible as the only source of revealed truth; broadly: a Christian not of a Catholic or Eastern church

2: one who makes or enters a protest

14 posted on 04/28/2013 9:48:43 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro can't pass E-verify)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: RegulatorCountry

Excellent post.

Does anyone else see the irony in attacking a Protestant group (left wing though it is) for attempting to define Catholicism by attempting to define Protestantism in return?

Conservative Catholics and conservative Protestants stand shoulder to shoulder socially and morally. Articles like this serve no useful purpose than to divide the Body of Christ.

The UCC no more defines Protestantism than this splinter group defines the Roman Church.


20 posted on 04/28/2013 10:02:46 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (Blather. Reince. Repeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: RegulatorCountry
I’m in complete agreement that Roman Catholics are entitled to define themselves on their own terms, so why the lashing out at “Protestants” when dealing with your own behaving disobediently?

Good question. How did this become a Protestant issue?

28 posted on 04/28/2013 10:35:01 AM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: RegulatorCountry
Strangely enough I agree -- we should stop using the term "Protestant" -- there are groups like the UCC or ECUSA who people from an evangelical background or WELS etc. would cringe at being clubbed with them

I'm sure you too would not call the UCC a potential ally of ours, right?

The article should have lashed out specifically at the UCC.

107 posted on 04/28/2013 10:58:12 PM PDT by Cronos (Latin presbuteros->Late Latin presbyter->Old English pruos->Middle Engl prest->priest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson