Posted on 05/03/2013 5:06:34 PM PDT by NYer
Dr. James Hitchcock was a guest recently on EWTN's "Bookmark" to talk with host Doug Keck about his book, History of the Catholic Church: From the Apostolic Age to the Third Millennium (Ignatius Press, 2013). Here is the video of that interview, in which Dr. Hitchcock discusses several different eras of history, some ancient and modern heresies, and common misunderstandings about the Church and her history:
EWTN Bookmark - 2013-04-21 - James Hitchcock - YouTube Video
The Catholic Church is the longest-enduring institution in the world. Beginning with the first Christians and continuing in our present day, the Church has been planted in every nation on earth.
The Catholic Church claims Jesus Christ himself as her founder, and in spite of heresy from within and hostility from without, she remains in the twenty-first century the steadfast guardian of belief in his life, death, and resurrection. The teachings and redemptive works of Jesus as told in the Gospels are expressed by the Church in a coherent and consistent body of doctrine, the likes of which cannot be found in any other Christian body.
The history of the Catholic Church is long, complicated, and fascinating, and in this book it is expertly and ably told by historian James Hitchcock. As in the parable of Christ about the weeds that were sown in a field of wheat, evil and good have grown together in the Church from the start, as Hitchcock honestly records. He brings before us the many characters-some noble, some notorious-who have left an indelible mark on the Church, while never losing sight of the saints, who have given living testimony to the salvific power of Christ in every age.
This ambitious work is comprehensive in its scope and in incisive in its understanding, a valuable addition to any school or home library.
James Hitchcock, Ph.D., is a longtime professor of history at St. Louis University, which he attended as an undergraduate. He received his masters and doctorate degrees from Princeton University and has authored several books, including The Supreme Court and Religion in American Life; The Recovery of the Sacred; What Is Secular Humanism; and Catholicism and Modernity: Confrontation or Capitulation?
"A remarkable achievement that synthesizes a lifetime of learning, James Hitchcock's History of the Catholic Church is also a signal service to twenty-first century Catholicism, a religious community in which controversy and contention are often the by-products of severe amnesia. The Church of the New Evangelization has to know its own story, and that story is told here in full."
- George Weigel, Distinguished Senior Fellow, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Washington, D.C.
"For years, James Hitchcock has been our premier historian - a dissident from conventional wisdom, well-armed and solid. Here he pioneers a new method for presenting a long sweep of history: an orderly and altogether fascinating series of vignettes - of arguments, movements, distinctive persons, and concrete events. There is just enough narrative in these sequences to carry the reader along, but without involving her in excessive interpretation. This book provides both a great resource for easy reference, and a stimulating definition of a Christian humanism that holds in tension the transcendent and the down to earth, the holy and the sinful. This is a tension which Hitchcock maintains throughout."
- Michael Novak
"James Hitchcock has a well-earned reputation as an outstanding scholar, insightful commentator and lucid, accessible writer. All of these skills come together and shine in his History of the Catholic Church. It's a masterwork: exhilarating in scope and a joy to read. If you want an unforgettable account of the fullness and drama of the Christian story, read this book."
+Charles J. Chaput, O.F.M. Cap., Archbishop of Philadelphia
"The gap in knowledge of history and current events sadly extends to us Catholics in our grasp of the Faith and
the rich history of the Church. In his ambitious new work, History of the Catholic Church from the Apostolic Age to the Third Millennium, James Hitchcock has given us an accessible tool to better our understanding...and love for the history of the Church. To love the Church, we must understand her history. As Blessed Pope John XXIII remarked, ‘History is our best teacher.' Thank you, Dr. Hitchcock, for this timeless gift to the Church for the Year of Faith."
- Cardinal Timothy Dolan, Archbishop of New York
"James Hitchcock is one of the few historians alive today with the background and ability to present the two-millenium history of the Catholic Church. In this remarkable volume Hitchcock brings a lifetime of insights and research to this important subject. It is a work of erudition in which the reader will discover not only the importance of the Catholic Church in past centuries, but in our own time."
- Thomas F. Madden, Ph.D.
Director of the Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, Saint Louis University
"This book, by one of the premier American Catholic historians, is clearly addressed to a broad audience. It is apologetic in the best sense, written from the point of view of a practicing Catholic, and addresses the various questions that would occur to a lay reader inevitably influenced by views found in the larger culture. The book is well written. It is not burdened down with details or many footnotes, but is attached to a strong narrative line centering on meaning. It would therefore be appropriate to study groups."
- Glenn W. Olsen, emeritus Professor of History, University of Utah
Ping!
I am reading it right now. An excellent book, though he has a lot of material to cover so that he can’t go too deep on any topic. I have only gotten to around 1100 AD, so a lot more to go.
Get his book, it’s really good.
I read an interesting book recently...”Did Jesus Exist?” by Bart D. Ehrman. He covers all the known evidence in an effort to respond to what he calls “mythacists” who claim that Jesus was just a myth and not a historical person. Even though he is a self-described agnostic, he firmly believes that Jesus existed. He points out that Jesus preached throughout his life that the judgement day would occur within his disciple’s lifetimes. You may find the book interesting...he is a college professor living in Chapel Hill.
It’s a good book - not as good as Warren Carroll’s multi-volume work, however.
Well, in a way Judgement Day did come. His Resurection was a judgment of the kings of this world and the underworld.
Ehrman does have actual scholarship to his credit, true. But he exaggerates, distorts, and rhetorically twists things to do maximum damage. In short, though he has scholarly cred, but his is far from a scholarly perspective.
Just as an example (one out of many) Ehrman makes huge dramatic claims about Biblical "inaccuracies" (actually, textual variants.) He says there are literally tens of thousands of them (and it's true.) What he doesn't tell you, is that the vast majority of them make no difference whatsoever. No difference in meaning. No difference in emphasis. Zip.
This is because (among other things) some texts were written when there was no standard spelling. It's like reading Canturbury Tales and getting bent out of shape because Chaucer spells the color "green" and "greene," and "grene." Also many textual variants just transpose words with no change in meaning ("sheep and oxen" vs "oxen and sheep.")
Some show a grammatical or even a rhetorical difference, but have no doctrinal impact.
Ehrman also fails to put this in context: the Biblical texts are far more consistent throughout variant texts, far more coherent, than the Sanskrit Rig Veda, the Egyptian Book of the Dead, the Akkadian Bronza Age literature, or any comparable set of texts.
Same deal with historic details: Erhman kicks up huge dust storms about tiny distinctions which actually make no difference; or markets suppositions as if they were facts.
Recommended: Bock and Wallace's "Dethroning Jesus", which includes an antidote to Ehrman.
Ehrman does have actual scholarship to his credit, true. But he exaggerates, distorts, and rhetorically twists things to do maximum damage. In short, though he has scholarly cred, but his is far from a scholarly perspective.
Just as an example (one out of many) Ehrman makes huge dramatic claims about Biblical "inaccuracies" (actually, textual variants.) He says there are literally tens of thousands of them (and it's true.) What he doesn't tell you, is that the vast majority of them make no difference whatsoever. No difference in meaning. No difference in emphasis. Zip.
This is because (among other things) some texts were written when there was no standard spelling. It's like reading Canturbury Tales and getting bent out of shape because Chaucer spells the color "green" and "greene," and "grene." Also many textual variants just transpose words with no change in meaning ("sheep and oxen" vs "oxen and sheep.")
Some show a grammatical or even a rhetorical difference, but have no doctrinal impact.
Ehrman also fails to put this in context: the Biblical texts are far more consistent throughout variant texts, far more coherent, than the Sanskrit Rig Veda, the Egyptian Book of the Dead, the Akkadian Bronza Age literature, or any comparable set of texts.
Same deal with historic details: Erhman kicks up huge dust storms about tiny distinctions which actually make no difference; or markets suppositions as if they were facts.
Recommended: Bock and Wallace's "Dethroning Jesus", which includes an antidote to Ehrman.
He had to work into the book that Obama was born in America, so I certainly take everything else he says with a grain of salt.
Dr. Hitchcock will be speaking at our church next month on the history of the Papacy. After seeing the video of his EWTN interview, I am really looking forward to it. Hopefully, he will bring copies of his book so I can buy one and maybe get him to sign it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.