Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Behind Behind the Candelabra
California Catholic Daily ^ | 6/6/13

Posted on 06/08/2013 10:53:02 AM PDT by marshmallow

San Bernadino diocese unwilling to tell how much money it received

The following update came in the email on June 3 from a Palm Springs resident.

Behind the Candelabra, the homosexual movie about the aging Liberace and his young teen boy-toy, Scott Thorson, debuted on Sunday, May 26th.

California Catholic readers will know that it was the San Bernardino diocese who made a financial deal with Hollywood producer, Jerry Weintraub to allow Our Lady of Solitude Catholic Church in Palm Springs to be used for several days as a set for the gay movie. Zsa Zsa Gabor got $75,000 from Weintraub so that her mansion could be used as part of the movie.

At the end of the show, Weintraub acknowledges the names of the cast, including those who played minor roles. He fails to acknowledge Father John Kavcak who played a cameo part and he fails to acknowledge the San Bernardino diocese for use of the church.

(Excerpt) Read more at cal-catholic.com ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; General Discusssion; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/08/2013 10:53:02 AM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

I haven’t watched the movie. I am not sure I will; however, maybe I should watch the homosexual scenes as the continual vomiting I would suffer would put a damper on my appetite.


2 posted on 06/08/2013 11:03:03 AM PDT by Stepan12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Disgusting! What kind of funeral did he actually receive?


3 posted on 06/08/2013 11:03:27 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Oh well, lay down with queers and wake up with whatever


4 posted on 06/08/2013 11:03:40 AM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

I have not seen the movie, but I understand it shows Liberace’s prediliction for BOYS, which we are continually told are not an object of lust for homosexual men. It might open people’s eyes.


5 posted on 06/08/2013 11:17:24 AM PDT by informavoracious (We're being "punished" with Stanley Ann's baby. Obamacare: shovel-ready healthcare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: informavoracious

Great point!!


6 posted on 06/08/2013 11:19:25 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion.....the HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Sadly, we won't be able to see a television movie in which Liberace plays Michael Douglas or Matt Damon ...

That might actually have been worth watching ...

7 posted on 06/08/2013 11:23:03 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: informavoracious

I saw it. Michael Douglas was pretty good as Liberace and Debbie Reynolds was GREAT as his mother. One thing they “cleaned up” was the fact that Liberace’s lover was 17 when they first hooked up. In the movie he’s 18.


8 posted on 06/08/2013 11:24:25 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: informavoracious
I haven't seen it and don't plan to, but it depends on how you define your terms.

If an adult sexually interested in 16 or 17 year-olds is a pedophile, Liberace was a pedophile.

If "pedophile" refers to someone interested in 10 or 12 year-olds, then the movie may not show him as a pedophile.

9 posted on 06/08/2013 11:30:01 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

I’ve seen the film as well; I noticed that too.

Michael Douglas was very good as Liberace - he captured Liberace’s speech and mannerisms very well, I thought. And yes, Debbie Reynolds was great as Liberace’s mother.


10 posted on 06/08/2013 11:31:55 AM PDT by AnAmericanAbroad (It's all bread and circuses for the future prey of the Morlocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: x

Actually, the proper term for someone sexually interested in young people in their mid-to-late adolescence is ‘ephebophilia’.


11 posted on 06/08/2013 11:34:52 AM PDT by AnAmericanAbroad (It's all bread and circuses for the future prey of the Morlocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

“Based on true story”, yeah! That’s what sells - fools paying $12 for a bucket of popcorn think they are seeing THE Truth portrayed.


12 posted on 06/08/2013 11:35:25 AM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnAmericanAbroad

The only thing I thought just missed with Douglas’ portrayal was a sense of “son of an immigrant” vibe and old school sensibility with the real Liberace. I can’t quite put my finger on it. Very, very good, maybe 9 out of 10.

With Reynolds however, the makeup enabled a fine actress to bring a complete transformation to life. If she doesn’t win sone awards it will be a travesty.


13 posted on 06/08/2013 11:56:03 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: x
Some enemies of the Catholic Church continue to claim the abusive priests were pedophiles, though most victims were post-puberty teenage boys. Defying logic, they then trot out "statistics" that show most pedophiles only desire sex with children and have no preference over boy or girl. In their minds they have proved that molesting priests were heterosexual. As far as close to age of consent, I thought I saw part of an interview where the now mature victim claimed that Liberace took advantage of him and ruined his life..

So Liberace was after a 17 year old. Most people would look askance at a 40 year old man chasing a 17 year old girl just the same.

14 posted on 06/08/2013 12:44:13 PM PDT by informavoracious (We're being "punished" with Stanley Ann's baby. Obamacare: shovel-ready healthcare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Good movie - expressed a couple of opinions I didn’t expect to see in such a show generally accepting of homosexually - Liberace’s lover at one point says in effect that he doesn’t mind being a pitcher, but finds being a catcher “repulsive” - “You find me repulsive?”, Liberace storms. “Not you, the act”, his boyfriend says - later Liberace opines that he’s glad celebrities like Jane Fonda have stopped “shouting at the world” with their personal opinions - “It’s our job to entertain people. not change the world”, he gripes - and the entire movie is pretty much a study of the hypocrisy and deceit of a showman like Liberace trying to portray himself to the public as hetero while living as a homosexual, even down to having his assistants attempt to have his death portrayed as resulting from heart failure rather than from AIDS - not an entirely charming picture of the homosexual way of life......


15 posted on 06/08/2013 9:51:55 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson