Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

To Puff or Not to Puff: Catholic experts weigh in on the morality of legalized marijuana
National Catholic Register ^ | 6/10/2013 | NISSA LAPOINT

Posted on 06/10/2013 2:44:17 PM PDT by markomalley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: James C. Bennett
Getting drunk is morally wrong. A little alcohol for you to get a little tipsy as per the OT is fine. Ditto with smoking. Now as regards to marijuana, I am in two minds. From a purely religious/moral point of view, you are correct, i see no difference between that and cigarettes as both get you mildly high and have no other benefits (wine can arguably be used to warm you up or add flavor to food, ditto beer)

From a health point of view, I probably see marijuana as slightly better than cigarettes. However on a social level, and I may be prejudiced by perceptions rather than reality, I see marijuana addiction as worse than cigarette addiction due to its side-effects on the person

41 posted on 06/11/2013 6:09:39 AM PDT by Cronos (Latin presbuteros>Late Latin presbyter->Old English pruos->Middle Engl prest->priest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

I work with Ph.Ds and engineers who smoke marijuana occasionally and have been doing so, for decades. I haven’t seen any serious side effects that have prevented them from being accomplished individuals with strong values and loving families.


42 posted on 06/11/2013 8:57:08 AM PDT by James C. Bennett (An Australian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

The act remains open to life even with condoms, as they are not 100% reliable. The argument is fecal only because the original “moral” argument in the article is straight out of a cesspool.


43 posted on 06/11/2013 9:02:09 AM PDT by James C. Bennett (An Australian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin; mylife

Ok that’s all very well and good but it doesn’t seem to answer mylife’s question, at least not the spirit of the question.

So in developing countries where water may be questionable in quality fine, consumption of alcoholic beverages may have a beneficial effect that outweighs any deleterious effects. So it’s “moral” there. But here in the US there are no such concerns so let’s get real.

In the US where the water is safe to consume, is consuming alcohol moral? Even just one drink?

I ask because I have a similar question/point as mylife. I have always wondered if pot became fully legal would it then become moral to consume it on a leisurely basis. It seems to me that it comes down to a question of potency. One drink won’t make one as intoxicated as one joint. Anyone who has smoked knows that.

But what about literally one puff, compared to one drink. It really gets hazy, no pun intended, as to what constitutes an “immoral buzz”. Because let’s be honest: people in the US who come home from a hard days work and have one or even two drinks aren’t drinking those drinks to avoid contaminated water. They are drinking them to relax.

So, couldn’t the same be said about one puff of marijuana? Literally one.


44 posted on 06/11/2013 9:25:56 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

As I said — those are my perceptions.


45 posted on 06/11/2013 10:55:24 PM PDT by Cronos (Latin presbuteros>Late Latin presbyter->Old English pruos->Middle Engl prest->priest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Cronos

I agree, but since we see a spectrum of behaviour among marijuana users, it tends to convey the opinion that marijuana is not a major factor in determining life outcomes in any significant way.

So, what’s the immorality of marijuana, then?


46 posted on 06/11/2013 11:45:03 PM PDT by James C. Bennett (An Australian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven; mylife
Yes, it does answer the question.

Pointing out that the there is no comparison with drunkenness is the answer to the question.

There's no legitimate comparison between the abuse of something that enables the safe use of a necessity and something that is pharmacia ( see Galatians) that is of no value other than to distort the senses and wallow in getting high.

Anyone who refers to the Bible as warning against drunkenness for their comparison rather than just reading the direct statement made regarding pharmacia needs to know that they're already off on a tangent and why it's a tangent.

47 posted on 06/12/2013 12:35:10 AM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson