Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Circum-Decision
Virtual Jerusalem ^ | 6/13/2013 | Rabbi Daniel Frank

Posted on 06/14/2013 5:27:08 PM PDT by Former Fetus

The mystique of Bris Milah is as old as Judaism itself. Throughout the generations, this mitzvah has been the pilot light, making sure that our spark would never be extinguished. For no matter how high the assimilation rate would rise, the importance of Bris, the seal of a covenant with God dating back to Abraham, was never questioned. Bris remained sacred to Jews of all stripes.

But now, for the first time in our history, that reassuring flame has begun to flicker.

"My husband and I are both Jewish, not practicing in the traditional sense, and we are debating whether to circumcise our son, soon-to-be born. We both have some problems with circumcision, and are researching a Jewish organization that opposes circumcision."

So speaks a young American woman on a popular radio talk show, sharing her willingness to give up a 3,000-year-old legacy, based on the little she knows about the procedure, and almost nothing about its meaning.

Yes, this woman may represent a negligible minority. But anti-circumcision literature is proliferating rapidly through the Internet and on the airwaves, planting thoughts in people's minds. Here is one example, which would be comical if it weren't so sad, from "Mothering" magazine:

Last year a baby boy was born to Jewish parents. The parents wanted to give the child a Bris without inflicting the pain of circumcision. On the eighth day friends were invited to their home. A friend who is a rabbinical student read the appropriate scriptures, blessed the child with a Hebrew name, and at the time of circumcision, a large organic carrot was produced and the tip severed. It was a joyous moment for all involved... Perhaps this is the alternative some of you may have been looking for.

(Excerpt) Read more at virtualjerusalem.com ...


TOPICS: Judaism; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: assimilation; bris
This is My covenant which you shall keep, between Me and you and your descendants after you: Every male child among you shall be circumcised; 11 and you shall be circumcised in the flesh of your foreskins, and it shall be a sign of the covenant between Me and you. He who is eight days old among you shall be circumcised, every male child in your generations, he who is born in your house or bought with money from any foreigner who is not your descendant. He who is born in your house and he who is bought with your money must be circumcised, and My covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant. And the uncircumcised male child, who is not circumcised in the flesh of his foreskin, that person shall be cut off from his people; he has broken My covenant.” (Genesis 17:10-14)
1 posted on 06/14/2013 5:27:08 PM PDT by Former Fetus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

seems pretty clear to me.


2 posted on 06/14/2013 5:29:33 PM PDT by ZinGirl (kids in college....can't afford a tagline right now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

http://www.torah.org/learning/beyond-pshat/5763/tazria.html

...The Midrash at the beginning of Shemos (The Book of Exodus) tells us that the bondage in Egypt only started after the Jews stopped circumcising themselves.

The Jews wanted to identify with the Egyptians and the rest of the world who were not circumcised. At that moment Pharaoh plotted and initiated the bondage - thus enslaving the Jews until their time of redemption. G-d allowed the events to evolve and unfold as they did because the decision of the Jews to be in an uncircumcised state...


3 posted on 06/14/2013 5:34:15 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

Son, I have one word for you: smegma. ‘nuff said.


4 posted on 06/14/2013 5:40:22 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Unindicted Co-conspirators: The Mainstream Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus
Circumcision and HIV.

http://articles.latimes.com/2013/apr/15/science/la-sci-penis-microbiome-20130416
5 posted on 06/14/2013 6:11:52 PM PDT by Trod Upon (Every penny given to film and TV media companies goes right into enemy coffers. Starve them out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

The Eighth Day:

Why is the circumcision preformed specifically on the 8th day? Scientific research has proven that on the 8th day of a baby’s life his blood clots at its fastest rate. Until the 8th and from the 9th the clotting is slower, rendering the 8th day the best possible day in a human being’s life to circumcise. Some claim that this is why Hashem commanded us to perform the circumcision on this day, in order to preserve the baby’s health in the best way possible; however can we indeed claim that this is the REASON we circumcise on the 8th day, or the reverse true? Hashem ensured that the clotting reach its peak on this day, because this was the day we would have to circumcise? If so, we are back to square one - what is the reason which binds the circumcision specifically to the 8th day of a baby’s life?

http://aliyosshmuel.com/thinkjewish.asp?AID=197


6 posted on 06/14/2013 7:15:04 PM PDT by SouthernClaire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus
This is My covenant which you shall keep, between Me and you and your descendants after you: Every male child among you shall be circumcised; 11 and you shall be circumcised in the flesh of your foreskins, and it shall be a sign of the covenant between Me and you.

Bravo - taking things out of context and across covenants. You cite and Old Covenant dictate. Perhaps you didn't notice how, in the New Covenant, such that continued circumcision as a way to "be obedient" were among those who were chastised for "falling from Grace" for trying to prove their worthiness in the face of the Savior's sacrifice. The New Covenant was a game changer.

7 posted on 06/15/2013 3:53:51 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb
Bravo - taking things out of context and across covenants

Eph 2:12 that at that time you were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world. 13 But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ.

Speaking to the “former” gentiles, Paul stands in opposition and says that it is you who are taking his words out of context. Do you even know what these covenants of promise are that we are now heirs to through Messiah? Paul doesn't say we are brought into something new, he states that we are now brought near to that which already existed.

And of course let us not forget, the “new” covenant is not really new, it is simply “renewed” as the actual covenant does not change, only the location from stone to hearts of flesh is made. This covenant also states that it is for the house of Judah and the house of Israel(the scattered sheep) and it is when the two are brought back together that the covenant will be fulfilled.

Religious talking points will be the demise of many just as political talking points become the eventual downfall of many because they know not that which they purport to speak of.

8 posted on 06/15/2013 6:37:41 AM PDT by patlin ("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

We’re not Jewish but we have a son, and I did research on this when expecting him. Among Gentiles in the US, it became popular during the Victorian era, IIRC, because it was thought that this would control boys’ urges and make them less horny in their teen years.

In the 20th Century, it grew more popular in the baby boomer years. My older three brothers, at the beginning of the boomer years, were not circumcised. By the time the later two boys came along, it was standard procedure for all boys. Now the practice is being reconsidered again.


9 posted on 06/15/2013 8:42:42 AM PDT by married21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: married21

http://www.otbrit.com/circumcision/the-mohel/

Crown Prince Charles Circumcised by London Mohel London (JTA) – Crown Prince Charles, son of Princess Elizabeth and heir to the British throne, was circumcised in Buckingham Palace by Rev. Jacob Snowman, official Mohel of the London Jewish community, the Mizrachi News Bureau reported. Rev. Snowman, who is a noted Jewish scholar specializing in the poetry of Bialik, has been ritual circumciser in London for many years.


10 posted on 06/15/2013 10:09:15 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SouthernClaire

Interesting! Under what circumstances would the mother not be considered impure?


11 posted on 06/15/2013 5:54:33 PM PDT by Former Fetus (Saved by grace through faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Trod Upon

Interesting study. Thanks for the link.


12 posted on 06/15/2013 7:23:56 PM PDT by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the Occupation Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

Circumcision is a Divine commandment to all Jewish fathers concerning all Jewish sons. Unfortunately, since you can’t talk about Divine commandments in public without sounding like Sarah Palin, the “official Jewish leadership” is going to try to make it a “like, it’s our thing, man” issue out of it.


13 posted on 06/15/2013 7:29:44 PM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (Ki-hagoy vehamamlakhah 'asher lo'-ya`avdukh yove'du; vehagoyim charov yecheravu!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: married21

In BB King’s autobiography, there’s a chapter called “Circumcision is no laughing matter.” He suffered from infections and was circumcised as an adult. It stopped the infections.

Maybe there’s some benefits, but he said he would have rather had it when he was an infant.


14 posted on 06/15/2013 7:38:21 PM PDT by Rides_A_Red_Horse (Why do you need a fire extinguisher when you can call the fire department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: patlin
Speaking to the “former” gentiles, Paul stands in opposition and says that it is you who are taking his words out of context. Do you even know what these covenants of promise are that we are now heirs to through Messiah? Paul doesn't say we are brought into something new, he states that we are now brought near to that which already existed. And of course let us not forget, the “new” covenant is not really new, it is simply “renewed” as the actual covenant does not change, only the location from stone to hearts of flesh is made. This covenant also states that it is for the house of Judah and the house of Israel(the scattered sheep) and it is when the two are brought back together that the covenant will be fulfilled. Religious talking points will be the demise of many just as political talking points become the eventual downfall of many because they know not that which they purport to speak of. So, you're saying the Jews are still under the dictate that they circumcise (The topic that started this thread)? Then it is also a given that they can't eat certain meats - do you believe that too? Was Peter's "dream" merely a fantasy? Why did Christ die? Why did he speak the Great Commandment and followup with the next, then tell us that where there is love, there is no harm and that concept fulfilled the intent of the commandments?

Perhaps it is not I that don't understand the import of the New Covenant that even God said would be a New Covenant (read Jeremiah and then call me mistaken).

The New Covenant is in fact a game changer and taking a single phrase or two without keeping proper context is no argument that will change it.

BTW - if you put in Eph 2:11 first, it helps make my point:
11 Therefore, remember that formerly you who are Gentiles by birth and called “uncircumcised” by those who call themselves “the circumcision” (which is done in the body by human hands)— 12 remember that at that time you were separate from Christ, excluded from citizenship in Israel and foreigners to the covenants of the promise, without hope and without God in the world. 13 But now in Christ Jesus you who once were far away have been brought near by the blood of Christ.

You must have known that the original topic was circumcision (else, why omit that single line in your post?) and those "Illuminati" that think it is still a requirement are sorely mistaken.

15 posted on 06/16/2013 3:15:54 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: trebb
Is God one?

Does the Son say He and the Father are one?

Is not there only one household of God?

If the goal of what Paul is speaking of in Eph is to bring all into that one household, then how could the Son teach that the two are to remain separated?

If God says something is right and a sign of a covenant, can it ever be wrong and a sign of breaking covenant?

If God says something is wrong and an abomination to Him, can that something ever be right?

16 posted on 06/16/2013 7:16:53 AM PDT by patlin ("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: patlin
Sounds good at face value. What was the purpose of the message in Ephesians? Many have different opinions but one that seems to prevail is the unity we need to maintain. Especially the Jews who still tried to separate from/elevate above the Gentiles. That's what started this whole deal - many Jews wanted to keep requiring circumcision despite the overarching message that it was no longer an edict. Read what surrounds the "Fallen from Grace statement/chastisement.

Some folks seem to place religious doctrine above the message because they need reason to believe in the doctrine more than in the message. One of the reasons I don't like religion and tend to agree with those that maintain it is sinful.

17 posted on 06/16/2013 9:03:27 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: trebb
The purpose of Ephesians is the bringing the two houses of Rm 11, the gentiles being the house of Gen 48:19, back together into one new man in and through Messiah. In restoring Israel back to one, then Israel would then again become the light to the nations, to the gentiles, that she was supposed to be because now with Messiah as the head, the body would walk and shine the Father's light just as the Son walks and shines the light of the Father. (Is 49:1-6; Ps 119:104-112)

In this, the words of Messiah are true when He said in Matthew 15, verse 24;

But He answered and said, “I was not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”

In John 10 Messiah said that other sheep He has that are not of that fold, that fold being the house of Judah that He was directly speaking to in the land of Judea.

Paul quotes the Prophets often and he didn't leave that custom of his out of Eph 2 when he, Paul, said;

17 And He came and preached peace to you who were afar off and to those who were near.

This is a direct quote from Isaiah 57:19, “I create the fruit of the lips: Peace, peace to him who is far off and to him who is near,” says YHVH, “And I will heal him.”

Paul oft refers us also back to Hosea who reveals that the lost sheep of Israel would become to look and act like the nations because of the false prophets that lead them.

Hosea 8:11 “Because Ephraim has made many altars for sin, they have become for him altars for sinning. 12 I have written for him the great things of My law, but they were considered a strange thing.

Many wanted to make the lost sheep be circumcised as a requirement for salvation, but circumcision has never been a requirement for salvation, but rather a sign of being a member of a covenant just as baptism is a sign of being a member of a covenant.

Paul states in Eph 2 that those who come to Messiah are not heirs of all the covenants of promise made with our fathers Abraham, Isaac & Israel (Jacob). And this is why Paul circumcised Timothy, because Timothy was called to teach and to teach, Timothy was convicted to be circumcised according to the covenant of promise he was now an heir to.

And that is the crux of the entire dialog of Acts 15, that one sect in verse 1 was teaching that circumcision was a requirement for salvation and the other sect, the believing sect in verse 5 was saying that it was a required as a sign of being a member of the covenant and body of Messiah. It was all cleared up in verse 21&22 when James said that these lost sheep, called gentiles, would hear Moses every Sabbath and in hearing they would come to understand and then do what Moses wrote, just as Messiah said would happen in Mt 23:1-3. This is called the ‘shema’ which is Dt 6:4-9 and which every Christian pastor is very familiar with. Shema means to hear and do, not just hear as to just hear is nothing because the fruit, our fruit we are to produce, is shown in the doing. Therefore, Messiah said,

Mt 7:20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.

He is the vine, we are the branches and if He as obedient unto death, so too are we to be if He is truly in us and we in Him. The branches do not determine the fruit, it is the vine that determines the fruit and that vine's roots are the Word of God that feeds the vine which feeds the branches.

Faith is not a religion, faith is a walk of life and He set before us two paths, the Way of the Father (Ps 119:1) and the way of death (Prov 14:12, 16:25). The choice is ours, blessing and life or evil(lawlessness) and death. And His Way has always contained the connection to Messiah as the Son came to do in the flesh, that which had already been done from the beginning.

Rev 13:8 All who dwell on the earth will worship him, whose names have not been written in the Book of Life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world.

Abraham knew the Lamb, Moses knew the Lamb. How is this if they had never known or seen the Lamb as Scripture tells us that they did?

John 8:56 Your father Abraham rejoiced to see My day, and he saw it and was glad.

Heb 11:24 By faith Moses, when he became of age, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh’s daughter, 25 choosing rather to suffer affliction with the people of God than to enjoy the passing pleasures of sin, 26 esteeming the reproach of Messiah greater riches than the treasures in Egypt; for he looked to the reward.

Ex 33:18 And he said, “Please, show me Your glory.” 19 Then He said, “I will make all My goodness pass before you, and I will proclaim the name of the YHVH before you. I will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.”

Rom 9:15 For he says to Moses, "I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion." John 1:18 No one has ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father's side, he has made him known.

John 3:13 “And no one has gone up into the heaven except He who came down from the heaven – the Son of Aḏam.

John 5:37 “And the Father who sent Me, He bore witness of Me. You have neither heard His voice at any time, nor seen His form.

Mat 11:27 “All have been handed over to Me by My Father, and no one knows the Son except the Father. Nor does anyone know the Father except the Son, and he to whom the Son wishes to reveal Him.

Rom 9:15 For he says to Moses, "I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion."

John 5:21 “For as the Father raises the dead and makes alive, even so the Son makes alive whom He wishes. 22 “For the Father judges no one, but has given all the judgment to the Son

Until one understands that it has been the Son all along, the Son who comes in the name of YHVH, then whether one be Jew or gentile, that one remains blind in part and lacks understanding of the plan and the promises of the Father given to us through the Son, the Word of God, the Voice of God.

Isa 8:14 He will be as a sanctuary, But a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense To both the houses of Israel,(see Rm 11 & Eph 2) as a trap and a snare to the inhabitants of Jerusalem.

18 posted on 06/16/2013 12:01:04 PM PDT by patlin ("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: patlin; metmom; CynicalBear; mitch5501

Wow...wow...You couldn’t be more wrong if you tried. The “purpose of Ephesians is the bringing the two houses of Rm 11, the gentiles being the house of Gen 48:19, back together into one new man in and through Messiah...” Since the one new man Paul speaks of is a MYSTERY, kept SECRET SINCE the world began, hid in God from the foundation of the world, and planned by Him from BEFORE the foundation of the world until revealed to the Apostle Paul, explain how, from the Scriptures, Gen. 48:19 brings Jew and Gentile “back together”...


19 posted on 06/16/2013 12:11:20 PM PDT by smvoice (Better Buck up, Buttercup. The wailing and gnashing are for an eternity..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: smvoice

Those who see no disctinction between Israel and the church are in for a big surprise.


20 posted on 06/16/2013 12:16:28 PM PDT by CynicalBear (For I decided to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Rides_A_Red_Horse
In BB King’s autobiography, there’s a chapter called “Circumcision is no laughing matter.” He suffered from infections and was circumcised as an adult. It stopped the infections.

Maybe there’s some benefits, but he said he would have rather had it when he was an infant.

My mother told me her older brother had to be circumcised as a teen and was in agony for days from it. She and all her siblings were born at home so it was not cone.

A good friend told me that her father demanded that all the sons and grandsons be circumcised. It was not done in the old country and during the war (WW1 I think) the rate of infection and gangrene was unbelievable among the uncircumcised men.

That would be enough for me. Gangrene?!?! Eeewww!!

21 posted on 06/16/2013 12:32:32 PM PDT by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

Hey, Former Fetus.

Not sure I understand your question in regards to my post’s subject. I’m going to assume that you delved further into the material at the link than did I. I just searched out a reference to the 8th day blood clotting part because it stuck in my mind and I was fascinated by it. YHWH never fails to fascinate.

But, I know the dangers of assuming. Please correct me and help me understand your question.

Best regards,

SC


22 posted on 06/16/2013 1:11:18 PM PDT by SouthernClaire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: smvoice
Mt 2:6‘But you, Bethlehem, in the land of Judah, are not the least among the rulers of Judah; for out of you shall come a Ruler who will shepherd My people Israel.’”

Micah 5:2 “But you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, though you are little among the thousands of Judah, yet out of you shall come forth to Me the One to be Ruler in Israel, whose goings forth are from of old, from everlasting.”

Now go read the rest of Micah 5, Jacob who is Israel is in the midst of the nations as if she is eaten up by them, she walks, talks and acts like them because she has forgotten her Maker and His Law is a strange thing to her as we read in Hosea.

He was not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel, but then as Paul says, not all Israel is Israel because God's house is not made up of the seed of man, but of the seed of Messiah, the seed of the woman who is the bride of Messiah and who the promise of Gen 3:15 given to, just as it was given to Sarah, not to Hagar.

Paul speaks of grafting in and then warns those grafted in not to boast against the natural branch. Why? Because Messiah said that salvation comes from the Jews. Paul says to Judah first, why? Because to Judah was given the promise of the eternal scepter, the Law holder of the Father, the one who is to rule and judge rightly by the Word of God, not adding to and not taking away, but ruling according to all that God has said and written.

God only has one house. He named that house Israel and so all who come to join His house, join the house of Israel which is neither Jew or gentile. Caleb was born a Canaanite, so how did he become a member of Judah? Because he wholly followed God's commands because he had a different spirit within him, God's spirit of truth. Of all the adult males of the tribe of Judah who left Egypt, the only one who entered the Promised Land was the one who was grafted in, not the one who was born of the seed of man, but the one of the seed of Messiah. Yes there were those of the physical seed of Judah who entered, but all those had been born in the wilderness. There was only a remnant who left Egypt who entered into the Promised Land and that remnant was Joshua that natural branch and Caleb the grafted branch, both who wholly followed the commands of God because they wholly believed in the promise of Messiah and eternal life.

Have you never read Hebrews 3-4 and how those who died in the wilderness never enter into His rest? Into His eternal kingdom? Have you never read in 1Cor 10 where Paul says that those in the wilderness became examples of disobedience that we are to learn from?

John 3:36 He that believeth in the Son, hath everlasting life, and he that obeyeth not the Son, shall not see life, but the wrath of God abideth on him.

As it was for them in the wilderness, so it is true for us, as to them the Gospel message was first given, which because it was not mixed with faith that God will deliver on all the promises He made, only a remnant actually received the reward of the promise and entered the Promised Land. The Promise Land then being a shadow and type of the Promised Land to come at Messiah's return.

23 posted on 06/16/2013 1:22:04 PM PDT by patlin ("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: smvoice
Paul speaks of is a MYSTERY ... how, from the Scriptures, Gen. 48:19 brings Jew and Gentile “back together”...

Well, if one actually reads and studies the chapters that come before Rm 11, then one knows that Paul is speaking of Rm 7 in which I might add, that unless you understand the Law of God, he, Paul, is not speaking to you.

Rm 7:1 Or do you not know, brethren (for I speak to those who know the law), that the law has dominion over a man as long as he lives? ... but if her husband dies, she is free from that law, so that she is no adulteress, though she has married another man. 4 Therefore, my brethren, you also have become dead to the law through the body of Messiah, that you may be married to another—to Him who was raised from the dead, that we should bear fruit to God.

And why was this a big deal to those Paul was speaking to?

Jer 3:8 Then I saw that for all the causes for which backsliding Israel had committed adultery, I had put her away and given her a certificate of divorce; yet her treacherous sister Judah did not fear, but went and played the harlot also.

Law Concerning Divorce

Dt:24 “When a man takes a wife and marries her, and it happens that she finds no favor in his eyes because he has found some uncleanness in her, and he writes her a certificate of divorce, puts it in her hand, and sends her out of his house, 2 when she has departed from his house, and goes and becomes another man’s wife, 3 if the latter husband detests her and writes her a certificate of divorce, puts it in her hand, and sends her out of his house, or if the latter husband dies who took her as his wife, 4 then her former husband who divorced her must not take her back to be his wife after she has been defiled; for that is an abomination before the Lord, and you shall not bring sin on the land which the YHVH your God is giving you as an inheritance.

So because they, the lost sheep, the ones who went spiritually whoring by worshiping according to what was right in their own eyes rather than according to the Way God commanded them to worship Him, they were banned from returning and had remained under the eternal curse of the Law of divorce, which is death. But God being a merciful God and not taking pleasure in the death of any man, God provided a way for them to enter back into His house.

And that is the “Good News”, that through Messiah, the lost sheep who had become the “fullness” of the gentiles, was freed from the curse of the Law by the redeeming blood of Messiah. They are now able to enter back into the household of God and be partakers in all the covenants of promise.

Gal 3:13 Messiah has redeemed us from the curse of the Law, having become a curse for us (for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree”), 14 that the blessing of Abraham might come upon the Gentiles in Messiah Yeshua, that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.

24 posted on 06/16/2013 2:28:08 PM PDT by patlin ("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SouthernClaire
This was in your link: " Now we can understand why Rav Asi is of the opinion that the circumcision is directly connected to the mother’s state of purity, and why his opinion is if the mother has not become impure, there is no need to wait till the 8th day to circumcise". My question is, what does he mean by "if the mother has not become impure"?

Leviticus 12:1-5 --> "Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, “Speak to the children of Israel, saying: ‘If a woman has conceived, and borne a male child, then she shall be unclean seven days; as in the days of her customary impurity she shall be unclean. And on the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin shall be circumcised. She shall then continue in the blood of her purification thirty-three days. She shall not touch any hallowed thing, nor come into the sanctuary until the days of her purification are fulfilled". ‘But if she bears a female child, then she shall be unclean two weeks, as in her customary impurity, and she shall continue in the blood of her purification sixty-six days.

Is there an alternative to bearing a boy or a girl? Just wondering!

25 posted on 06/16/2013 4:39:28 PM PDT by Former Fetus (Saved by grace through faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus

This is pretty esoteric stuff, but the reference is to cesarean section. It’s slightly more clear in the original source:

http://www.halakhah.com/shabbath/shabbath_135.html


26 posted on 06/16/2013 5:05:58 PM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

Thanks, I would have never thought of that.


27 posted on 06/16/2013 5:29:23 PM PDT by Former Fetus (Saved by grace through faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Former Fetus; jjotto

Thanks for the reply, Former Fetus. Tomorrow I will read the link jjotto provided. Thanks, Jjotto.

Looks very interesting. Please let me know if you come about the answer to your question.

Best Regards,

SC


28 posted on 06/16/2013 5:48:12 PM PDT by SouthernClaire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson