The Supreme Court was so liberal in 1963 our country is lucky we survived it.There must be a lesson here.
The difference is that in 1963 a large reserve of moral capital was still a foundation of the Zeitgeist of the Age. The radical Supreme Court was an anomaly, and many of their radical decisions were merely formal, and not immediately enacted by a society which still largely revered godliness and public morality.
That reserve of moral capital has now dwindled to a tenuous thread after decades of incessant chiseling away by the 60's barbarians. Any similar radical decision today is bound to be acted upon by the reprobate political party in power.