“Not that it matters, can we assume that if it were historical invalid and incoherent you likely would not have gotten to this point?”
I’m not sure what this has to do with your original complaint. However, could the Word of God ever be historically invalid and incoherent? If it was incoherent, it couldn’t possibly be the Word of God, and there would never have been a Holy Spirit for to make me a believer. It seems a blasphemous thing to even consider when we know it isn’t true. But I know that even as the scripture is historically valid and coherent, full of proofs historical and rational to believe, that there are those who would never believe in it, despite how worthy it is to believe, and there are those who will, because:
1Co_12:3 ... no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost.
This seems a very reasonable thought process and conclusion. Thanks.
Can you say basically what was your thought process in coming to conclude that scripture says you do not have free will?