Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"A Scotch-Irish Presbyterian Rebellion"
Arctic Pilgrim ^ | April 2, 2013 | Justin

Posted on 07/04/2013 8:40:22 AM PDT by Alex Murphy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
The more I read on the history of America and the Scottish/English reformations, the more I am convinced that American liberty has far more to do with John Knox than it does John Locke. It has far more to do with the principles contained in Vindiciae Contra Tyrannos and Lex Rex than it does Common Sense. The more I study, the more I am coming to believe that the loss of American liberty has more to do with the abandonment of these Scotch-Irish Calvinist principles/dedication to the crown rights of Christ than it has to do with the abandonment of "Enlightenment" humanism, rationalism, and Sensualism....These Scotch-Irish had learned well the lessons of tyrants, both of the civil and ecclesiastical types, and had suffered at the hands of the Erastians, who taught that the Church was subordinate to the state. They understood that failing to recognize the crown of Christ -in both the civil realm and the church- was to bow the knee to the tyranny of man....

....I pray that Americans who want less government and more freedom stop seeking and trusting in political means for their salvation. I pray that they turn to God, covenanting with Him and binding their families, communities, states, form of government, and their republic itself to Him in a new National Covenant- one that is all ours....A covenant that comes from the bottom up, from the people, the "grassroots," to use a modern term....A covenant that binds us to God, signed in our national lifeblood. Without such a covenant, without such a restoration, commitment, and foundation, our national lifeblood, figuratively, and perhaps someday literally, will be spilled on the altar of tyranny, which is, as these great men understood, nothing other than the logical and inevitable outcome of a people's rejection of God.

1 posted on 07/04/2013 8:40:22 AM PDT by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Happy Presbyterian Rebellion Day! Ping the GRPL!


2 posted on 07/04/2013 8:42:42 AM PDT by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
Thanks for this I will read it later. I just posted on another thread a bit of my family history. One of my earliest ancestors in America got into a fight with the Presbyterians, Isle of Wight (I think) and they cut off his ear!

I don't think Presbyterians are like that anymore! :)

3 posted on 07/04/2013 8:46:26 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Yes, I think we can trace two basic “Christian” theories of governance, which reflect the theological divisions among Christians. Catholics, reflecting their top-down hierarchy and obedience to unquestionable authority, have usually favored monarchies. Protestants, reflecting their bottom-up communities of believers and adherence to a looser set of principles rather than immutable dogma, prefer republics and representative governments.


4 posted on 07/04/2013 8:59:41 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

It seems like your generality is true.


5 posted on 07/04/2013 9:01:52 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
Letter to Charles Carroll, March 15, 1790

As mankind become more liberal they will be more apt to allow that all those who conduct themselves as worthy members of the community are equally entitled to the protection of civil government. I hope ever to see America among the foremost nations in examples of justice and liberality. And I presume that your fellow-citizens will not forget the patriotic part which you took in the accomplishment of their Revolution, and the establishment of their government; or the important assistance which they received from a nation in which the Roman Catholic faith is professed. - George Washington

6 posted on 07/04/2013 9:07:14 AM PDT by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Gone Galt, 11/07/12----No king but Christ! Don't tread on me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Wow,,thank you for giving me a new topic to research and learn about!


7 posted on 07/04/2013 9:07:14 AM PDT by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reed13

bfl


8 posted on 07/04/2013 10:10:35 AM PDT by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Read Albion’s Seed—A study of four British Folkways, by David Hackett.

Great stuff on the Scot and Scots/Irish migrations to America and the way they affected the United States in the early years of the colonies and the Republic.


9 posted on 07/04/2013 10:11:30 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman; Alex Murphy
I prefer yet another Catholic iteration: anarcho-monarchism .
10 posted on 07/04/2013 10:11:40 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("The story of the human race is the story of men and women selling themselves short." Abraham Maslow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
Yes, I think we can trace two basic “Christian” theories of governance, which reflect the theological divisions among Christians. Catholics, reflecting their top-down hierarchy and obedience to unquestionable authority, have usually favored monarchies. Protestants, reflecting their bottom-up communities of believers and adherence to a looser set of principles rather than immutable dogma, prefer republics and representative governments.

I agree!

11 posted on 07/04/2013 10:23:07 AM PDT by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
I prefer yet another Catholic iteration: anarcho-monarchism.

You should find a good article and post a thread on it!

12 posted on 07/04/2013 10:24:25 AM PDT by Alex Murphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

“One of my earliest ancestors in America got into a fight with the Presbyterians, Isle of Wight (I think) and they cut off his ear!
I don’t think Presbyterians are like that anymore!”.

uh...Yes, yes we are..He, your ancestor, got off light..


13 posted on 07/04/2013 11:21:08 AM PDT by triSranch ( Home of J.C. Calhoun and the Birthplace and Deathbed of the Confederacy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

I have always felt that the “congregational” form of religion brought with it many principles that were foundational to our American notion of individual freedom. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congregational_polity

There is the basic concept of “covenant” - voluntary association and consent of the governed; a written constitution; individual responsibility; representative democracy; independence of local government within a union of like governments (confederation.)

This has always been in conflict with the model of the corporate structure that financed the new colonies. The joint-stock company or commercial corporation was licensed by the Crown, where investors pooled their money to share both risks and profits in a common enterprise. Several large trading companies secured charters from the Crown granting commercial favors in foreign trade, prescribing their form of organization and enabling them to raise money by selling stock. Among these were the Muscovy Company (Russia and central Asia,) the Eastland Company (Baltic,) the Levant Company (Mediterranean,) and the East India Company.

The form of organization prescribed for these companies usually vested control in a 6-20 member council, of which the original or “charter” officers were named. Sometimes the charter also provided for a governor as the head of the company, chosen by the council. Membership in the company, itself, was secured through stock ownership. The smaller stockholders had little to say about general policy, but they met periodically in a general court to elect members to vacancies in the council or occasionally to express their opinion on some major issue of policy.

The American colonies had their government imposed upon them by England following the joint stock company model. It has always been in tension with the congregational form, which is the organic form emanating from the people themselves. The form as continued in the US remains in tension with the spirit.


14 posted on 07/04/2013 11:40:06 AM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: triSranch

I was a member of a Presbyterian church for a couple of years. I never went back after the day the minister, from the pulpit, laughed when he announced that Clinton had been found “innocent” of the charges.

He wasn’t found innocent you jerk, he was found guilty but not removed from office. I didn’t say that to him but I wanted to stand up and say it right there in front of God and everybody!


15 posted on 07/04/2013 12:37:48 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

BORN FIGHTING..by James Webb. Great read.


16 posted on 07/04/2013 12:38:36 PM PDT by Conservative4Ever (I'm going Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Crown rights of Christ indeed! No king but Jesus is creed of Scots Irish.


17 posted on 07/04/2013 2:12:36 PM PDT by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Seems to have some similarities to our “checks & balances” gridlock approach, in practice. If you must have a government, make it an ineffective one!


18 posted on 07/04/2013 7:45:13 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

Ding-ding-ding-ding! You get the Cookie of Comprehension, my dear friend.


19 posted on 07/04/2013 7:57:48 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: marsh2

Good analysis


20 posted on 07/04/2013 8:19:31 PM PDT by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson