Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pope Francis distinguishes between homosexual orientation, gay lobby
Catholic Culture ^ | 07/29/2013

Posted on 07/29/2013 8:51:24 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-60 last
To: RummyChick

I saw his sentencing was set for June 25th... I can’t find anything on it.

What I don’t get is, how could he OWN a sex toy and drug paraphernalia shop? And to launder the drug money... he had to be using as well.

BTW, I was told by someone (who was the head of one of the centers they sent priests to for treatment, because I wanted to know why as well), that the church, especially after the summer of love and Vatican II, went to ‘psychiatrists’ and social work types that deal with these situations from the outside world for help. So of course you can guess what their recommendations were. Big mistake. That’s like going to Timothy Leary to help me get my kid off drugs back then.

There were rarely priests who were also psychiatrists.

I’m going to find out what happened re: sentencing. Will let you know.

I have to pray for him; The Lord takes oaths seriously and I wouldn’t want to be there when he stands before him.


51 posted on 07/29/2013 10:47:46 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Pray/Penance. Isa 5:18-21,10:1-3 "Tempus faciendi, Domine, dissipaverunt legem tuam")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"Because 'the state' is given power to punish an offence that does not give a random mob of people the right to harass someone."

I don't recall bring up mobs. I doubt very much that even most Christians would be in favor of executing people for witchcraft. We don't take that kind of thing seriously any more, and we do like our bacon.

Those were only two examples. Others can be pulled out that are just as silly in a modern context. If we don't take some biblical injunctions seriously any longer why should we take others that come out of the same pages?

Does the Bible condemn homosexuality? No doubt about it, the Old Testament is very clear. But the Old Testament is just clearly not the guide to life today, even for devout Christians.

52 posted on 07/29/2013 10:49:52 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Everyone here should please remember how sloppy and shallow the media generally is on matters of religion and faith. What language was he speaking in? Did they get the words correct? I’ve seen some mentions of “homosexuality” and the “Bible” here, but PRECISION is required on this matter. The homosexual orientation is NOT sinful. Homosexual acts are sinful. An alcoholic’s desire to drink isn’t sinful. But if he does drink and acts out, a discussion of sin comes in. I admit that I wait for some clarification of the Pope’s words because church discipline says only mature men with self-control are to be admitted to the priesthood. If it turns out that the media’s translation and interpretation of the Pope’s words is sloppy and incorrect, don’t be surprised.


53 posted on 07/29/2013 11:17:38 AM PDT by MDLION ("Trust in the Lord with all your heart" -Proverbs 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mlo

RE: Does the Bible condemn homosexuality? No doubt about it, the Old Testament is very clear. But the Old Testament is just clearly not the guide to life today, even for devout Christians.

1) The apostle Paul reiterates the condemnation in Romans Chapter 1.

2) Homosexuality is a MORAL behavior, therefore, condemnation against the act is not rescinded in the New Testament.

3) The homosexual act has been condemned as sinful by the church from the first century onwards.


54 posted on 07/29/2013 11:38:10 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I didn’t say anything about the church’s opinion, nor the specific rationale used to justify thier conclusions.

The point is that people pick and choose which biblical convictions they accept. We don’t get our morality from the Bible, we accept the parts of the Bible that agree with our morality. It’s not just homosexuality and withcraft and food laws.


55 posted on 07/29/2013 2:30:55 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd; G Larry
"All I am called to do is to contrast the deeds and actions of anyone with the standards of the Bible."

In keeping with that point of view, let's compare that view itself to what Christ said:

Matthew 5:38 You have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.
Matthew 5:39 But I say to you not to resist evil :
but if one strike thee on thy right cheek, turn to him also the other :
Matthew 5:40 And if a man will contend with thee in judgment, and take away thy coat, let go thy cloak also unto him.
Matthew 5:41 And whosoever will force thee one mile, go with him other two.
Matthew 5:42 Give to him that asketh of thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not away.

People can reach any conclusion they like but personally I consider Jesus Christ to be the final authority. Of course, there are a lot of people who people pick and choose to make it easy on themselves and some even throw out portions they don't like. To each his own, as they say, but I always remember the part of working out my Salvation with fear and trembling instead of trying to slide past what I don't like.

56 posted on 07/30/2013 12:25:50 PM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

Christ, Matthew, and the Pope, are of one accord on this:

If only the temptation is present, and not the behavior or the self-advertising, then there is nothing to be observed, judged, or objected to.

Having the temptation in front of you is neither a deed or an action.


57 posted on 07/30/2013 12:33:01 PM PDT by G Larry (Let his days be few; and let another take his office. Psalms 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

For context, you may benefit from the full quote:

“But I would like to add one more thing: I see that very often in the Church, there is a tendency to seek out sins committed in youth, and make them public.

I am not speaking about crimes: the abuse of minors is a crime.

But if a layperson, or a priest, or a nun, has sinned, the Lord forgives and forgets. And this is important – the Lord forgets. We do not have the right to not forget.

… St. Peter committed one of the most serious sins, apostasy, and yet they made him Pope.

Much is written about the gay lobby … but I haven’t found gay identity cards in the Vatican, although they say they exist.

I think that when we encounter a gay person, we must distinguish the fact of being gay from that of forming part of a lobby, as not all lobbies are good. That is the problem.

But if a person is gay and seeks God and has good will, who am I to judge him?”


58 posted on 07/30/2013 12:49:47 PM PDT by G Larry (Let his days be few; and let another take his office. Psalms 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
I understand that and agree.

I also wonder how many of the folks who don't understand believe they're sinning when they watch the soft porn in the sports they love and in the movies they watch numerous times.

Once someone yields to the temptation, it's a sin. The heart of the problem is, though, that ordaining someone who admits to constantly being tempted in a way that leads to pedophilia is putting them in the very position they would find most difficult to resist. It's almost exclusively male queers who molest children.

That's why such folks shouldn't be ordained to begin with any more than celibate heterosexual males should be ordained then placed in the role of chaplains at strip joints and live sex shows.

59 posted on 07/30/2013 12:56:00 PM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

I have read the entire quote. I have no argument with what the Pope had to say.


60 posted on 07/30/2013 12:57:46 PM PDT by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson