Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

It’s my understanding that the doctrinal concern is that he may be considering allowing communion to those in a second union without the necessity of an annulment.

Whether that is what he means is not clear. I guess time will only tell.


24 posted on 08/08/2013 4:51:42 PM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: piusv

“doctrinal concern is that he may be considering allowing communion to those in a second union without the necessity of an annulment.”

I hope not! It cost me a lot of time, and friends when I converted just to be eligible to receive. Like it was said, “the way is not narrow”. Ugh. If they got married, then they have to live with their poor decision. Nobody forced them to get married. They made some bad choices and those choices have consequences.


35 posted on 08/08/2013 5:34:16 PM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson