Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THOSE "DR LAURA" QUESTIONS ANSWERED
Christian Voice ^ | 08/27/2013 | Stephen Green.

Posted on 08/27/2013 12:34:52 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Dr Laura Schlessinger is a US radio personality who dispenses advice to people who call in to her radio show. A few years back, she said, rightly, that homosexuality is an abomination according to Leviticus 18:22, and cannot be condoned under any circumstances. An open letter to Dr. Laura was penned and posted on the Internet. It has since done the rounds:

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Dear Dr. Laura,

Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and I try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind him that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate.

I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the specific laws and how to best follow them.

a) When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord (Lev 1:9). The problem is my neighbors. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

b) I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

c) I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual uncleanliness (Lev 15:19-24). The problem is, how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.

d) Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?

e) I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself?

f) A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an Abomination (Lev 11:10), it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this?

g) Lev 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?

h) Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev 19:27. How should they die?

i) I know from Lev 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

j) My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? (Lev 24:10-16) Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)

I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident you can help.

Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is eternal and unchanging.

Your devoted disciple and adoring fan.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The idea of the questions is that the requirements of God's law through Moses look silly and that therefore that looking to the Bible for any questions of morality is silly. The questions fall down by making no distinction between the judicial and moral laws of God, which in their general equity are still in force, and ceremonial matters of ritual holiness and the priesthood, which has all passed with the sacrifice of Jesus. But I am going too fast already.

Dr Laura Schlessinger herself became a convert to Judaism in 1998. A Jew shouldn't have a probem with these questions any more than a Christian, as Jews are used to living under the law of the land, and as for the observations of ritual cleanliness, for Jews you do them if you are a Jew, and you don't if you are a Gentile. Easy.

Dr Laura is now thought to be leaning towards Christianity, inspired by the loving and supportive letters she has had from Christians over the last few years. Christianity is after all the logical outworking of Judaism, as Yeshua Maschiach (that's Jesus Christ in Hebrew) fulfilled all the Biblical (ie Old Testament) Messianic prophecies. Through Him, Christians have a more personal relationship with God than is possible under Judaism. Dr Laura said recently: "I have envied my Christian friends who really, universally, deeply feel loved by God."

Well, on sending out copies of our glossy booklet "Homosexuality and the police" to the press last year, I received "the questions" in a letter from Paul Borny, "Group Senior Writer" at Capital Radio Group, which, apparently, is an equal opportunities employer, and takes exception to "hateful, offensive, homophobic material." I can't think how that applies to "Homosexuality and the police", but there we are.

From a brief web-look, I can't see that anyone has attempted to answer the Dr Laura questions before. No matter, I am brash enough to have a go, by the grace of God. Here follow the famous questions to Dr Laura Schlessinger, and my replies to them more or less as I sent them to dear Mr Borny. Oddly enough, he never replied. Perhaps he had a sense of humour failure:

Q. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odour for the Lord (Leviticus 1:9). The problem is my neighbours. They claim the odour is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?

A. No. You need a Israelite priest to offer the sacrifice for you in the Temple in Jerusalem; you can't just do it yourself in your back garden. You have a problem! The Temple was destroyed in 70 AD. But stop believing in the pleasing odour of animal sacrifices anyway, for it is written that the blood of bulls and goats can never take away sin (Heb 10:4). You need to believe that the sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the cross takes away all your sin, now and forever. As to offering violence against your neighbours, that will have you hauled up in front of the magistrates for a breach of the peace and actual bodily harm at a minimum under any system of law, ancient or modern.

Q. I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of uncleanliness (Leviticus 15:19-24). How do I tell? I have tried asking but most women take offence.

A. This is to do with purity of worship in the Temple . Not just sexual intercourse (we would all be agreed on that) but even touching a menstruating woman made the one who touched her unclean. It has passed. When the Temple in Jerusalem was sacked in 70 AD, as Jesus prophesied, it was already 40 years past its use-by date. The sacrifice of Jesus in AD 30 (+/- a year or two) had rendered the doings of the Temple obsolete. Even the veil of the Temple (which separated the Holy of Holies from the rest of Temple ) was torn in two (Matt 27:51) at His death. Believe in His death and you will be forgiven. Believe in His resurrection and you will live. If the matter you raise still troubles you, you should avoid all contact with women other than your own wife. And if you don't know when she is in what you describe as her period of uncleanliness, then heaven help you.

Q. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may buy slaves from the nations that are around us. A friend of mine claims that this applies to the French but not to the Scots. Can you clarify? Why can't I own Scottish people?

A. It doesn't actually say slaves, it says 'bondmen and bondmaids'. People who were poor bonded themselves or their children to someone wealthy. It was a form of social security. It is also written (Exod 21:16) that anyone who steals a man to sell him shall be put to death. So those Muslim slavers who took and sold black slaves to the white man were flat out of order and worthy of death. Don't forget that the man who had slavery outlawed in Britain was William Wilberforce, an evangelical Christian. Atheists were quite happy with slavery.

Q. I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as it suggests in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?

A. It actually says 'maidservant' not slave. I should have thought you were doing well enough at Capital not to have to sell your daughter as a bonded servant. What a rotten dad you are, to want to get rid of her even though you can afford to keep her. Daughters are precious. So are sons, come to that. You'ld have to be in pretty dire straights 3,000 years ago to sell your children as servants, but I guess they would at least get fed and housed then. Anyway, back to your daughter. I think you would do better to send her to college and then see if she can't get a job. Mind you, most jobs today are just wage-slavery, aren't they? We spend 45% of our time working for the tax-man. Who can be totally free? Only those who trust in Jesus and know the truth will be free, as it is written, 'The truth shall make you free.' (John 8:32)

Q. I have a neighbour who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obliged to kill him myself or may I arrange for our vicar to do it?

A. Neither. You need to remember that the ancient principle of 'due process' still persists in our law today, despite a succession of Home Secretaries, including dear David Blunkett, wanting to get rid of it as a bit of an impediment to the Government just locking up whoever they want. So you can't go around putting people to death yourself, that is what we Christians call murder. OK, if someone killed your son or raped your daughter, you might call it vengeance, but you have no personal interest in what your neighbour is doing, it just gets up your nose a bit. Report your neighbour to the police, support your allegation with two witnesses, and see if the police can find a law against what your neighbour is doing. They won't. This country doesn't do a day of rest in any form any more.

Q. Leviticus 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?

A. This applies to the High Priest of ancient Israel, who entered into the Holy of holies once a year on the Day of Atonement. I suppose God has a right to say who was going to approach Him in the Holy of holies. But even if you are a cohen, (a) you won't find the Temple still standing today and (b) all that Temple ritual is past. Jesus has been and has offered Himself for the sins of all who will believe in Him. Job done. Finished.

Q. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Leviticus 19:27. How should they die?

A. God did not want His people looking like the pagan priests of the nations round about with dodgy haircuts and peculiar beards. Getting your hair cut as such isn't wrong in the eyes of God. Exekiel the prophet (Ezek 44:20) says that the rule for the priest is to have his hair cut neatly, not shave his head nor grow his hair stupidly long like what the pagans do. Can't see this was a capital offence, though, even then.

Q. I know from Leviticus 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?

A. Clean and unclean animals are done away with by Peter's vision in Acts 10:11-15. My advice if this really worries you is to play as a forward or a back, and not as a midfielder, as they do most throwing in and place-kicking, and certainly don't play in goal. And don't handball either, as that is against the laws of the game.

Q. A friend of mine feels that though eating shellfish is an abomination (Leviticus 11:10) it is a lesser abomination than homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this?

A. They are different words in Hebrew, so your friend is right. But in any case, the clean and unclean animals distinction has gone with Peter's vision. So the New Testament abolishes the Old Testament food laws, although there are Christians who observe the Old Testament food laws not least for health reasons. Shellfish, for example, don't half store up toxins But the New Testament confirms that homosexual activity is an abomination.

Q. My friend tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone him as commanded in Leviticus 24:10-16 ?

A. Yes, because it is all a matter of due process. You are a bit for taking the law into your own hands, aren't you? Does your friend actually curse the Name of God like the man in Leviticus did? Anyway, next you must find a judge and jury who will convict him. Unless his blasphemy really is scurrilous, abusive or offensive to God, Jesus Christ or the Bible, and tends to vilify the Christian religion, you are unlikely to see a conviction in our land today. Best let your friend know how offended you are and if he persists, get another friend. He sounds a bad sort, anyway.

Q. My uncle has a farm. He violates Leviticus 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend).

A. Doesn't sound much of a farmer. How is he going to harvest it? Mind you, he could put a fence down the middle, then he would have two fields, and he could sow one crop on one side and the other on the other side, I suppose. As long as his wife does not wear a mixture of wool and linen, she should be OK to go and take part in ancient Israelite society. Back to the future!

Q. Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws (Leviticus 20:14)?

A. You don't half have a vicious streak. Once again, in God's design for mankind, the State has the responsibility for the judicial death penalty, not the family. God's law does not allow people to put members of their own family to death. You are thinking of Islam and Hinduism. Oh, and Britain today. When our Parliament passed the Homicide Act 1965 and the Abortion Act 1967, they took away the death penalty from the guilty, by the State, where it belongs, and placed it on the innocent, within the family, where it does not. Macabre or what?

P.S. Another silly question was added later:

Q. A reading of 2 Chronicles, 4:2 makes clear that mathematicians have for many years been under a misconception that the number pi (the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter) was a transcendental number which is approximately 3.1415. The true value of pi, as the Bible makes clear in this passage, is actually 3. Am I personally obliged to burn all maths textbooks, put to the sword as blasphemers all who propagate the false value of pi and forbid all false images of the true circle?

A. Do you really think the ancients didn't know the value of pi? What we have here is something us engineers call 'rounding'. You really must deal with your bloodthirsty nature, though. All this taking the law (or what you think it is) into your own hands just will not do. And nit-picking over a couple of Biblical decimal points is not blasphemy. My, isn't there some God-hating ignorance out there!


TOPICS: Evangelical Christian; Judaism; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: drlaura; leviticus; oldtestament

1 posted on 08/27/2013 12:34:52 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

bookmark


2 posted on 08/27/2013 12:47:22 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (What, oh what is this thing called 'Stupid'?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I'll copy and save this! I've had this exact argument thrown at me many times by atheist and nonbelievers when I try to articulate the biblical position on homosexuality. This is the first time I've seen a point by point response that throws it right back at them.
3 posted on 08/27/2013 12:51:41 PM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Thank you for that post. It was most informative. :)


4 posted on 08/27/2013 12:54:01 PM PDT by Utilizer (Bacon A'kbar! - In world today are only peaceful people, and the mooslimbs trying to kill them-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Why is it that Liberals claim to be so open minded, for multiculturalism, and acceptance of all people, EXCEPT Christians?  As  a Christian I find this diatribe on the Bible as offensive.  It is Christaphobic and intellectual dishonest.  This email was written by a homosexual activist using the  Saul Alinsky tactics of ridiculing your enemy. What is not pointed out is that all most all religions are against homosexuality.

 Islam states “"When a man mounts another man, the throne of God shakes."

"Kill the one that is doing it and also kill the one that it is being done to." (in reference to the active and passive partners in gay sexual intercourse)” Qur'an (7:81) Why are there not emails condemning this?

 The verses quoted in this email are from the Old Testament and are taken out of context.  Many of these items were written to help maintain a civilized and healthy society.  

 Leviticus 13 covers regulations about infectious skin diseases. Leviticus 15 talks about bodily discharges and cleanliness. Are the homosexuals against washing your hands after going to the bathroom?

 Leviticus 18 is about Sexual Relations and what is NOT acceptable. In includes not having  sexual relations with family members; like Mothers, Daughters, and Sons;  or  with animals.

The letter makes reference to slavery. At that time many people sold themselves into slavery. Some of the references could be construed to how to deal with employees.  It was due to Christians  disgust with slavery that the USA has a war to totally eliminate it.

No one points out that Muslims are still practicing slavery in Africa.

Second Christianity went through a reformation and many of these practices have been abandoned, or have been found to be contradictory to Christian values, unlike Islam.

 Homosexuality by definition is a pervasion, an abnormality, and abomination against nature. It affects less than 2% of the population, and usually brought about by pedophilia or sexual relations between an older adult with a teenager. 

 Christians love the sinner, hate the sin. Because we are more excepting we do not advocate stoning them. We also realize that their relationships should not be put on par with heterosexuals because their relationship cannot produce offspring that is related to both members.

Society has a right to decide what it needs to survive.  It determines what it will Permit, Promote, and Prohibit.  It permits civil unions for homosexuals; it promotes marriage between a man and a woman to create a stable family for children; and, it prohibits homosexual marriage.

 Whenever homosexual marriage is put to a vote, it has been voted down by a large majority. As Obama has said, the vote has been taken, we won, get over it.

This letter also ignores the problems to society and to the individual due to homosexuality. 

 A bible verse left out is Isaiah 32:5-8

5. The vile person shall be no more called liberal, nor the churl said to be bountiful. 6. For the vile person will speak villainy, and his heart will work iniquity, to practice hypocrisy, and to utter error against the LORD, to make empty the soul of the hungry, and he will cause the drink of the thirsty to fail  7. The instruments also of the churl are evil: he deviseth wicked devices to destroy the poor with lying words, even when the needy speaketh right. 8. But the liberal deviseth liberal things; and by liberal things shall he stand.

 The word Liberal by itself when looked up in dictionaries has mostly a desirable definition. But the scripture is clear that vile people are being referred to as liberal.  God said there would come a time when the vile would no more be called liberal. This shows that right now vile people are being called liberal and God says he will stop this practice some time in the future.  He also said the churl (rude and stingy) are being called bountiful.

 There is another scripture in Isaiah 5:20 that addresses this.  It says, "Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!"

In Isaiah 32:8 (quoted above) it says  "But the liberal deviseth liberal things; and by liberal things shall he stand."  He is saying that the truly liberal or noble person will do truly noble things and stand.  You only have to examine the behavior of the liberals today to see that they are not noble or princely.  They are the people who want abortion on demand which is gruesome and horrid--not noble.  So we know the scripture is true that vile people are being called liberal.

 The Statistics on Homosexuality and its Effects

Catholic Apologetics International

 http://www.catholicintl.com/news/news.htm

  Some statistics about the Homosexual lifestyle:

         * One study reports 70% of homosexuals admitting to having sex only one time with over 50% of their partners (3).

        * One study reports that the average homosexual has between 20 and 106 partners per year (6). The average heterosexual has 8 partners in a lifetime.

        * Many homosexual sexual encounters occur while drunk, high on drugs, or in an orgy setting (7).

        * Many homosexuals don't pay heed to warnings of their lifestyles: "Knowledge of health guidelines was quite high, but this knowledge had no relation to sexual behavior" (16).

        * Homosexuals got homosexuality removed from the list of mental illnesses in the early 70s by storming the annual American Psychiatric Association (APA) conference on successive years. "Guerrilla theater tactics and more straight-forward shouting matches characterized their presence" (2). Since homosexuality has been removed from the APA list of mental illnesses, so has pedophilia (except when the adult feels "subjective distress") (27).

        * Homosexuals account for 3-4% of all gonorrhea cases, 60% of all syphilis cases, and 17% of all hospital admissions (other than for STDs) in the United States (5). They make up only 1-2% of the population.

        * Homosexuals live unhealthy lifestyles, and have historically accounted for the bulk of syphilis, gonorrhea, Hepatitis B, the "gay bowel syndrome" (which attacks the intestinal tract), tuberculosis and cytomegalovirus (27).

        * 73% of psychiatrists say homosexuals are less happy than the average person, and of those psychiatrists, 70% say that the unhappiness is NOT due to social stigmatization (13).

        * 25-33% of homosexuals and lesbians are alcoholics (11).

        * Of homosexuals questioned in one study reports that 43% admit to 500 or more partners in a lifetime, 28% admit to 1000 or more in a lifetime, and of these people, 79% say that half of those partners are total strangers, and 70% of those sexual contacts are one night stands (or, as one homosexual admits in the film "The Castro", one minute stands) (3). Also, it is a favorite past-time of many homosexuals to go to "cruisy areas" and have anonymous sex.

        * 78% of homosexuals are affected by STDs (20).

        * Judge John Martaugh, chief magistrate of the New York City Criminal Court has said, "Homosexuals account for half the murders in large cities" (10).

        * Captain William Riddle of the Los Angeles Police says, "30,000 sexually abused children in Los Angeles were victims of homosexuals" (10).

        * 50% of suicides can be attributed to homosexuals (10).

        * Dr. Daniel Capron, a practicing psychiatrist, says, "Homosexuality by definition is not healthy and wholesome. The homosexual person, at best, will be unhappier and more unfulfilled than the sexually normal person" (10). For other psychiatrists who believe that homosexuality is wrong, please see National Association for Research and Therapy of Homosexuality.

        * It takes approximately $300,000 to take care of each AIDS victim, so thanks to the promiscuous lifestyle of homosexuals, medical insurance rates have been skyrocketing for all of us(10).

        * Homosexuals were responsible for spreading AIDS in the United States, and then raised up violent groups like Act Up and Ground Zero to complain about it. Even today, homosexuals account for well over 50% of the AIDS cases in the United States, which is quite a large number considering that they account for only 1-2% of the population.

        * Homosexuals account for a disproportionate number of hepatitis cases: 70-80% in San Francisco, 29% in Denver, 66% in New York City, 56% in Toronto, 42% in Montreal, and 26% in Melbourne (8).

        * 37% of homosexuals engage in sadomasochism, which accounts for many accidental deaths. In San Francisco, classes were held to teach homosexuals how to not kill their partners during sadomasochism (8).

        * 41% of homosexuals say they have had sex with strangers in public restrooms, 60% say they have had sex with strangers in bathhouses, and 64% of these encounters have involved the use of illegal drugs (8).

        * Depending on the city, 39-59% of homosexuals are infected with intestinal parasites like worms, flukes and amoebae, which is common in filthy third world countries (8).

        * The median age of death of homosexuals is 42 (only 9% live past age 65). This drops to 39 if the cause of death is AIDS. The median age of death of a married heterosexual man is 75 (8).

        * The median age of death of lesbians is 45 (only 24% live past age 65). The median age of death of a married heterosexual woman is 79 (8).

        * Homosexuals are 100 times more likely to be murdered (usually by another homosexual) than the average person, 25 times more likely to commit suicide, and 19 times more likely to die in a traffic accident (8).

        * 21% of lesbians die of murder, suicide or traffic accident, which is at a rate of 534 times higher than the number of white heterosexual females aged 25-44 who die of these things(8).

        * 50% of the calls to a hotline to report "queer bashing" involved domestic violence (i.e., homosexuals beating up other homosexuals) (18).

        * About 50% of the women on death row are lesbians (12).

     Homosexuals prey on children.

         * 33% of homosexuals ADMIT to minor/adult sex (7).

        * There is a notable homosexual group, consisting of thousands of members, known as the North American Man and Boy Love Association ( NAMBLA). This is a child molesting homosexual group whose cry is "SEX BEFORE 8 BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE." This group can be seen marching in most major homosexual parades across the United States.

        * Homosexuals commit more than 33% of all reported child molestations in the United States, which, assuming homosexuals make up 2% of the population, means that 1 in 20 homosexuals is a child molestor, while 1 in 490 heterosexuals is a child molestor (19).

        * 73% of all homosexuals have had sex with boys under 19 years of age (9).

        * Many homosexuals admit that they are pedophiles: "The love between men and boys is at the foundation of homosexuality" (22).

        * Because homosexuals can't reproduce naturally, they resort to recruiting children. Homosexuals can be heard chanting "TEN PERCENT IS NOT ENOUGH, RECRUIT, RECRUIT, RECRUIT" in their homosexual parades. A group called the "Lesbian Avengers" prides itself on trying to recruit young girls. They print "WE RECRUIT" on their literature. Some other homosexuals aren't as overt about this, but rather try to infiltrate society and get into positions where they will have access to the malleable minds of young children (e.g., the clergy, teachers, Boy Scout leaders, etc.) (8). See the DC Lesbian Avengers web page, and DC Lesbian Avengers Press Release, where they threaten to recruit little boys and girls. Also, see AFA Action Alert.

     The homosexual agenda.

         * The homosexual agenda includes desensitizing the public: "The first order of business is desensitization of the American public concerning gays and gay rights.....To desensitize the public is to help it view homosexuality with indifference instead of with keen emotion. Ideally, we would have straights register differences in sexual preferences the way they register different tastes for ice cream or sports games....At least in the beginning, we are seeking public desensitization and nothing more. We do not need and cannot expect a full 'appreciation' or 'understanding' of homosexuality from the average American. You can forget about trying to persuade the masses that homosexuality is a good thing. But if only you can get them to think that it is just another thing...then your battle for legal and social rights is virtually won" (25).

        * Part of the homosexual agenda is to get the public to affirm their filthy lifestyle, as one homosexual admitted in the October 1987 homosexual rally on Washington: "We are no longer seeking just a right to privacy and a protection from wrong. We also have a right -- as heterosexual Americans already have -- to see government and society affirm our lives" (27).

        * Part of the homosexual agenda is to turn people from Christianity: "The teaching that only male-female sexual activity within the bounds and constraints of marriage is the only acceptable form should be reason enough for any homosexual to denounce the Christian religion" (1).

        * Homosexuals knowingly lied (and still lie) about the 10% figure (i.e., homosexuals make up 10% of the population). As Tom Stoddard (formerly of the Lambda Legal Defense Fund) said, "We used that figure when most gay people were entirely hidden to try to create an impression of our numerousness" (17).

     The true number of homosexuals.

         * The Kinsey study of 1948, which homosexuals often cite to say that 10% of the population is homosexual, actually says that only 4% of the population is EXCLUSIVELY homosexual. This study involved a disproportionate number of people who had been in jail for sex crimes (hardly a random sample of the population). Kinsey also did perverse studies involving young boys and pedophiles. Information on Kinsey.

        * Current research shows that the true percentage of homosexuals is in the 1-2% range (15,23,26,28). Consider how small this number is when compared to most of the numbers above.

  Homosexuals aren't discriminated against in employment, so why should they be a protected class?

         * The average yearly income of a homosexual is $55,430.00 (most of which is disposable because no children to take care of!). The average of the general population is $32,144.00. The average of blacks is $12,166.00 (24).

        * 59.6% of homosexuals are college graduates. 18.0% of the general population are college graduates (24). Too bad they aren't smart enough to listen to God. "Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools" (Romans 1:22).

        * 49.0% of homosexuals hold professional/managerial positions. 15.9% of the general population hold such positions (24). Where's the job discrimination?

     Sexual Orientation

 ·         A phrase that has come up recently in this earth is "sexual orientation." This is a phrase made up by homosexuals to try to make themselves look less filthy than they really are. The purpose of the phrase is to take the spotlight from what these perverts do, and put it on the notion that they are just poor, mistreated people, who simply are attracted to members of the same sex - as if they aren't engaging in activity forbidden by God Almighty. "Sexual orientation," as used today, has nothing to do with sexual activity (yeah, right), but only refers to who or what a particular person is attracted to. If you think that people of other "sexual orientations" are just fine, let's see what other "sexual orientations" you would necessarily have to accept as wholesome and pure. If you're not going to discriminate based on "sexual orientation", then you must not discriminate against any of the following. Bestiality, pedophile, necrophilia.,  exhibitionism, fetishism, frotteurism,  masochism, sadism, transvestitism, voyeurism. If you discriminate against any of these, you're a hypocrite. These "sexual orientations" are generally known as "paraphilias", and are mental disorders - just like homosexuality used to be (29).·          

     REFERENCES

 

    (1) Advocate, 1985.

    (2) Bayer, R. Homosexuality and American Psychiatry.

    (3) Bell, A. and Weinberg, M. Homosexualities: a Study of Diversity Among Men and Women. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1978.

    (4) Cameron et. al. ISIS National Random Sexuality Survey. Nebraska Med. Journal, 1985, 70, pp. 292-299.

    (5) "Changes in Sexual Behavior and Incidence of Gonorrhea." Lancet, April 25, 1987.

    (6) Corey, L. and Holmes, K. "Sexual Transmission of Hepatitis A in Homosexual Men." New England J. Med., 1980, pp. 435-38.

    (7) Family Research Institute, Lincoln, NE.

    (8) Fields, Dr. E. "Is Homosexual Activity Normal?" Marietta, GA.

    (9) Jay and Young. The Gay Report. Summit Books, 1979, p. 275.

    (10) Kaifetz, J. "Homosexual Rights Are Concern for Some," Post-Tribune, 18 December 1992.

    (11) Kus, R. "Alcoholics Anonymous and Gay America." Medical Journal of Homosexuality, 1987, 14(2), p. 254.

    (12) Lesbian News, January 1994.

    (13) Lief, H. Sexual Survey Number 4: Current Thinking on Homosexuality, Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality, 1977, pp. 110-11.

    (14) Manlight, G. et. al. "Chronic Immune Stimulation By Sperm Alloantigens." J. American Med. Assn., 1984, 251(2), pp. 237-438.

    (15) Morton-Hunt Study for Playboy

    (16) MsKusick, L. et. al. "AIDS and Sexual Behavior Reported By Gay Men in San Francisco." Am. J. Pub. Health, 1985, 75, pp. 493-96.

    (17) Newsweek, February 1993.

    (18) Newsweek, 4 October 1993.

    (19) Psychological Reports, 1986, 58, pp. 327-37.

    (20) Rueda, E. "The Homosexual Network." Old Greenwich, Conn., The Devin Adair Company, 1982, p. 53.

    (21) San Francisco AIDS Foundation, "Can We Talk."

    (22) San Francisco Sentinel, 27 March 1992.

    (23) Science Magazine, 18 July 1993, p. 322.

    (24) Statistical Abstract of the U.S., 1990.

    (25) "The Overhauling of Straight America." Guide Magazine. November, 1987.

    (26) United States Census Bureau

    (27) United States Congressional Record, June 29, 1989.

    (28) University of Chicago's Nation Research Corp.

    (29) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition, American Psychiatric Association, 1994.

 

    © 2000- 2003 International Organization of Heterosexual Rights

5 posted on 08/27/2013 12:56:20 PM PDT by Exton1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Hilarious!

Dr. Laura kills it on her radio show. I really only tune in during the call in segments. She pulls no punches and puts up with zero illusions. She simply lays it right out there.


6 posted on 08/27/2013 1:06:51 PM PDT by drunknsage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scripter

ping


7 posted on 08/27/2013 1:17:34 PM PDT by latina4dubya (when i have money i buy books... if i have anything left, i buy 6-inch heels and a bottle of wine...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Exton1
Why is it that Liberals claim to be so open minded, for multiculturalism, and acceptance of all people, EXCEPT Christians? As a Christian I find this diatribe on the Bible as offensive. It is Christaphobic and intellectual dishonest. This email was written by a homosexual activist using the Saul Alinsky tactics of ridiculing your enemy. What is not pointed out is that all most all religions are against homosexuality.

Hatred of Christians (and Jews, at least Israelis) is a common thread among Muslims, homosexuals, atheists, Marxists and leftists of many stripes. Maybe it is because they all answer to the same boss: Satan.

8 posted on 08/27/2013 1:26:56 PM PDT by Sans-Culotte ( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Q. A reading of 2 Chronicles, 4:2 makes clear that mathematicians have for many years been under a misconception that the number pi (the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter) was a transcendental number which is approximately 3.1415. The true value of pi, as the Bible makes clear in this passage, is actually 3. Am I personally obliged to burn all maths textbooks, put to the sword as blasphemers all who propagate the false value of pi and forbid all false images of the true circle?

I agree that it is silly, and a nit, but the Pi question actually indicates that the Questioner needs to spend more time on Reading Comprehension, along with mathematics. The reference is:

2 Chronicles 4:2 Also he made a molten sea of ten cubits from brim to brim, round in compass, and five cubits the height thereof; and a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about.

If I stop reading I'd conclude that there was rounding involved, as this is not critical to the message (a description of the building of the Temple, and a math lesson). But, if I was paying attention to what I read I'd also notice that the ten cubits was measured from "brim to brim". Was this from the outside of the brim to the outside of the brim, or from the inside of the brim to the inside of the brim? And if I read down to verse 5, I'd see that the thickness of this circular brass 'sea' was a 'handbreath'.
So let's say the ten cubit measurement was from from outside of the brim to the outside of the opposite brim.
Let's say a cubit is 18 inches (one and a half feet), and a 'handbreadth' is 4 inches (granted - this can vary depending on the size of the hand) -- a line of thirty cubits would compass the inner circle of the 'sea' (the portion that actually held the water).
And you would get the the correct number for Pi [30 cubits x 18 inches/cubit] / [(10 cubits x 18 inches/cubit - (2 handbreadths x 4 inches/handbreadth)] = 0.999 Pi (and given that "handbreadths' are involved - close enough).

9 posted on 08/27/2013 1:32:56 PM PDT by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Cid

Bump.


10 posted on 08/27/2013 1:44:34 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bump


11 posted on 08/27/2013 2:07:25 PM PDT by RaceBannon (Lk 16:31 And he said unto him If they hear not Moses and the prophets neither will theybe persuaded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Q. A reading of 2 Chronicles, 4:2 makes clear that mathematicians have for many years been under a misconception that the number pi (the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter) was a transcendental number which is approximately 3.1415. The true value of pi, as the Bible makes clear in this passage, is actually 3. Am I personally obliged to burn all maths textbooks, put to the sword as blasphemers all who propagate the false value of pi and forbid all false images of the true circle?

Dr. Laura’s response about ‘round off’ doesn’t do this justice and one first has to start by examining the scripture the individual quoted…. 2 Chronicles 4:2 “Also he made a molten sea of ten cubits from brim to brim, round in compass, and five cubits the height thereof; and a line of thirty cubits did compass it round about.” A few years ago, I wrote up a lengthy explanation of this and why it is consistent with basic math which I can’t find at the moment… however, the information here http://bibleprobe.com/pi.htm and here http://jerry.praxisiimath.com/pi.html at least are part of the answer to this. /p>

12 posted on 08/27/2013 2:10:08 PM PDT by hecticskeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A worthy response - factual and witty - to the tired ploy of using Old Testament laws to mock God’s prohibition of homosexual behavior. Christians know that the birth, death and resurrection of Christ cancelled the Old Testament law but that the moral teachings did not change.


13 posted on 08/27/2013 2:12:39 PM PDT by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A. Clean and unclean animals are done away with by Peter’s vision in Acts 10:11-15.

Pretty good, but The vision peter saw had nothing to do with animals, it had to do with the salvation of the gentiles.

Read verse 28
28 And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company, or come unto one of another nation; but God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean.


14 posted on 08/27/2013 3:15:40 PM PDT by ravenwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

my point..

anyone can cherry pick a passage to suit their own end needs..

just go and ask the people who wrote, kept, and have studied the bible for over 2 millenium..

not a babtist, not a protestent, not a lutheran..

ask a catholic, and you will get 2000 years of study on the subject..


15 posted on 08/27/2013 3:33:17 PM PDT by joe fonebone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Dr Laura is now thought to be leaning towards Christianity, inspired by the loving and supportive letters she has had from Christians over the last few years.

Dr. Laura is a flake and no one should attempt to use her as an example of anything except self-promotion. She's been an agnostic, a Jew, and now, perhaps, a Christian. She went from advocating for homosexuals to condemning them.

Look, I used to enjoy her show. But, c'mon, the woman's hardly an ideological rock.

16 posted on 08/27/2013 4:46:20 PM PDT by BfloGuy (People who know what they’re talking about don’t need PowerPoint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Every command God ever gave was given for our benefit and welfare. Some of these commandments are dated and have been replaced by other commandments (such as dietary laws). This is not because God changed His mind but because we were growing as a society. If you read the commandments (yes, even those in Leviticus) and ask yourself, "What was God trying to help us with." then even some of these strange commandments takes on a completely different context. Their purpose was for our benefit.
17 posted on 08/27/2013 5:29:14 PM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BfloGuy

RE: Dr. Laura is a flake and no one should attempt to use her as an example of anything except self-promotion. She’s been an agnostic, a Jew, and now, perhaps, a Christian. She went from advocating for homosexuals to condemning them.

I’m not sure if “flake” ( the wishy-washy type of no principles sort of person ) is an apt description of her philosophy and stance in life.

So far, she’s been moving in the RIGHT DIRECTION on all the issues you have just pointed out.

I would call this as slowly being convinced by the truth.

It would be foolish of someone to hold on to an idea that is UNTRUE, and she clearly is showing an openness to moving towards what is right and true.

If someone slowly see’s the light regarding the personhood of the fetus in the mother’s womb and abandons her support for abortion, I would not call that person a flake at all.

I’d call the person HONESTLY looking at the issue and abandoning a mistaken belief. THAT IS A GOOD THING.

I just hope that she is moving towards Christianity, not simply because Christians have shown her more support than the Jews in general, but because the TRUTH of Jesus Christ, His claims, and the historicity of the resurrection is slowly dawning on her.


18 posted on 08/27/2013 6:11:32 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson