Skip to comments.Four Christian universities refuse to ‘support access to abortion, which destroys human life’: Attys
Posted on 09/26/2013 6:01:15 PM PDT by Morgana
OKLAHOMA CITY, September 26, 2013 (LifeSIteNews.com) Four Christian universities in Oklahoma have filed a joint lawsuit in federal court seeking to overturn the HHS mandate.
All four schools Oklahoma Baptist University, Mid-America Christian University, Southern Nazarene University, and Oklahoma Wesleyan University assert that the ObamaCare stipulation violates their constitutional rights, forcing them to violate their deeply held Christian beliefs against abortion in order to avoid massive governmental fines.
The Oklahoma schools join dozens of other religious employers who have sued the federal government over the contraceptive/abortifacient mandate.
While the Obama administration has offered a limited compromise arrangement exempting certain churches and religious organizations from the rule, schools or businesses and other entities who employ and/or serve people outside of their own faith are not covered by the exception.
The universities are Christ-centered institutions of higher learning, the schools attorneys wrote in the lawsuit, filed Friday. They believe that God has condemned the intentional destruction of innocent human life. The Universities hold, as a matter of religious conviction, that it would be sinful and immoral for them intentionally to participate in, pay for, facilitate, enable, or otherwise support access to abortion, which destroys human life.
But they argued that the government continues to treat entities like the universities as second-class religious organizations, not entitled to the same religious freedom rights as substantially similar entities that qualify for the exemption. They asserted that the rationale for entirely exempting churches and integrated auxiliaries from the regulations--their employees are likely to share their religious convictions--applies equally to the universities.
The lawsuit says the schools reject the accommodation offered by the Obama administration, in which religious employers not covered by the exception can distance themselves from actions they consider immoral by passing the cost on to the insurance company instead of paying for it themselves.
That arrangement, according to the schools lawyers, still conscripts the Universities into the governments scheme, forcing them to obtain an insurer or third-party claims administrator and submit a form that specifically causes that insurer or third-party administrator to arrange payment for the objectionable drugs, so that such coverage will apply to the Universities own employees as a direct consequence of their employment with the Universities and of their participation in the health insurance benefits the Universities provide them.
The lawyers also pointed out that the federal government has exempted numerous public and private employers from various requirements of ObamaCare for purely secular reasons.
Employers with grandfathered plans, small employers, and favored others are exempt from these rules, the lawyers wrote in their filing.
According to the lawsuit, if the universities "follow their religious convictions and decline to participate in the government's scheme, they will face, among other injuries, enormous fines that will cripple their operations.
Christian colleges should remain free to operate according to the beliefs that define them, said Gregory Baylor, senior counsel for Alliance Defending Freedom, who is representing the schools in court. This mandate leaves religious employers with no real choice: you must either comply and abandon your religious freedom and conscience, or resist and be taxed for your faith. If religious convictions mean nothing in this context, there is no stopping what the government can ultimately do.
In other words, four Christian universities that are truly Christian.
It is not enough to make abortion legal. The liberals demand that we pay for it and facilitate it.
**Oklahoma Baptist University, Mid-America Christian University, Southern Nazarene University, and Oklahoma Wesleyan University **
"...of whom the world is not worthy..."
Everyone voting for these pro-abortion candidates has the blood on their hands.
If this gets to the Supreme Court it is good to remember that Roberts is already bought.
This is really good news. I hope others join them.
This is a good start.
I guess what I am getting at is are the places that refuse to provide coverage for such services as abortion and contraceptives only hiring and admitting women who don't want and wouldn't use these parts anyway? Also, do those women who work at or attend these places have to disclose what their views are about abortion and contraception and will they be required to disclose when and if they DO exercise their benefits for these services? What happens to them if they do?
One last point...shouldn't a business, especially one that has a religious background, have the right to hire only those who agree with them on these issues and don't women already have the right to reject working for a company if they are not offered the benefits and health coverage they desire? Before Obamacare, women who wanted birth control or abortions paid for them out of pocket and their employer was none the wiser. What really IS the basis for forcing religious or secular companies, who have moral objections to child murder through abortion and/or abortifacient drugs, to purchase the coverage anyway?
Same thing they are doing with homosexual "marriage" and "gay rights". By mandating acceptance, they are mainstreaming what was once immoral and rejected by a moral society. Slowly but surely they have eaten away at societal "norms" until bad is now good and good is now bad. The horizon is NOT looking good for this country.
Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness; Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter! Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes And clever in their own sight! (Isaiah 5:20-21)