Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Baptist Leader Says Pope Soft on Sin
Associated Baptist Press ^ | Bob Allen

Posted on 10/05/2013 6:21:52 AM PDT by marshmallow

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: goodwithagun

No stones...just want everyone to know the truth and be filled with the Spirit.


41 posted on 10/05/2013 6:44:36 PM PDT by jodyel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

Anti-Catholicism, not anti-catholic.


42 posted on 10/05/2013 6:45:58 PM PDT by jodyel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rusty schucklefurd

Neither are led by the Holy Spirit.


43 posted on 10/05/2013 6:47:50 PM PDT by jodyel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jodyel

Yep. Stones. But hey, whatever helps you sleep at night.


44 posted on 10/05/2013 7:23:19 PM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun

Don’t brush everyone with the same broad strokes.....some of us would just like to see others born again and Spirit filled. We want that for all.

I sleep fine at night.

Perhaps one day you can tell me why so against believers. I was once in need of hearing the Gospel and God made sure I did. Why would we then not want to tell others?


45 posted on 10/05/2013 8:07:44 PM PDT by jodyel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan

“You are hanging to much on the single word “conceives’”

Wow, you’ve really strayed off topic. I didn’t say “conceives”, the pope did. He unwittingly introduced unnecessary confusion at the very least through his choice of words. I don’t see how you can deny that the pope lacks the same type of clarity that we have come to expect with his predecessors. You can’t maintain that the pope has been clear, because if he had been clear, we would not have had this controversy.

As to whether he pope is deliberately engaging in false teaching, I would agree that he is probably not. And of course, the pope is human, and too err is human. But he is the pope, not a pundit, and we should expect better.

I can tell you one thing. If this pope make doctrinal statements on theology that rise to the level of dogmatic infallibility, he better have some experts on theology and grammar looking over his shoulder. That will make your job as unwavering papal apologist much easier.


46 posted on 10/05/2013 8:45:08 PM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est. New US economy: Fascism on top, Socialism on the bottom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: grumpygresh

I didn’t say that the Pope didn’t say “conceives.” I said that your presumed sharp distinction between the meaning of “conceives” and “thinks” was baseless.

My point was that the Pope didn’t say anything new, and that his use of the word “conceives” doesn’t introduce anything new.

The Church and all moral theologians have always held that no one is culpable if he obeys his sincere judgment about what is right and wrong.

I don’t know who you think you are talking to, but “unwavering Papal apologist”? Have you read my posts? Did you even read my post to YOU?


47 posted on 10/05/2013 9:38:23 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan (If you're FOR sticking scissors in a female's neck and sucking out her brains, you are PRO-WOMAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson