Skip to comments.The unrelenting 'Gay Mafia' has bullied A&E into suspending 'Duck Dynasty' star Phil Robertson
Posted on 12/20/2013 8:22:58 PM PST by NKP_Vet
LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Here are the comments that cost Phil Robertson his place on the show. Speaking in the January issue of GQ, Robertson told the magazine:
"It seems like, to me, a vagina-as a man-would be more desirable than a man's anus. That's just me," Robertson told GQ. "I'm just thinking: There's more there! She's got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes! You know what I'm saying? But hey, sin: It's not logical, my man. It's just not logical."
The reporter asked Robertson what he found sinful, so Robertson explained.
"It seems like, to me, a vagina-as a man-would be more desirable than a man's anus. That's just me," Robertson told the magazine. "I'm just thinking: There's more there! She's got more to offer. I mean, come on, dudes! You know what I'm saying? But hey, sin: It's not logical, my man. It's just not logical . Don't be deceived. Neither the adulterers, the idolaters, the male prostitutes, the homosexual offenders, the greedy, the drunkards, the slanderers, the swindlers-they won't inherit the kingdom of God. Don't deceive yourself. It's not right."
(Excerpt) Read more at catholic.org ...
Bill O’Reilly stands with Evil on this.
I stand with Phil, Paul, God, and all that is good.
Even though I stand with good, it doesn’t matter. Who has the most power seems to matter, and it would seem that the homosexual minority has the power.
If you like your vagina you can keep your vagina?
OReilly is like a lot of northeast Republicans: he probably knows few Southerns .Has he ever visited the South? Yankees are so parochial.
” - - - The reporter asked Robertson what he found sinful, so Robertson explained. - - - “
IOW, “This is an OPINION test, and only Homos have grading privileges, so please, PLEASE lie just like politicians do every day!”
His free speech may not have been violated, but his civil rights were!
It is against the law to discriminate against someone due to their religious beliefs.
Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects individuals against employment discrimination on the bases of race and color, as well as national origin, sex, and religion. Title VII applies to employers with 15 or more employees, including state and local governments. It also applies to employment agencies and to labor organizations, as well as to the federal government.
Dang..now that’s a point I hadn’t thought of...although Lord knows I’ve had enough EEO drilled into me over the years. Maybe Phil needs to talk to a good lawyer....
But you know, it’s his right to say what he said and A&E made a choice in how to react. I really hope they will now be left alone to deal with the consequences of that choice - it could be a good “teachable moment” about the power of Gay America vs. Traditional America.
Bigots come in all shapes and sizes. This time ti came with GLAAD.
Just about all the Fox News team have thrown Robertson under the bus. Hannity is the only one that seems to think Robertson got screwed, but then again ends a program saying “personally I don’t care what someone does behind closed doors”. Tonight on O’Reilly that homo “marriage” supporting Bernard Goldberg said Robertson was “despicable” for saying what he did about sodomites and that Christians have no sense if they take the Bible literally. I have always known he was a Christian-hater, but he really showed it tonight. He also said A&E was right to suspend Robertson. Howard Kurtz said the same thing. To me Fox News is the little brother of CNN. Day by day they cave more and more into the homosexual agenda.
It seems to me the last 4 or 5 states that accepted ‘gay marriage’ got a lot less coverage on FR and other media outlets than this cable TV duck thing. Maybe I’m wrong. And of course I think garbage A&E is being completely hypocritical on several levels, but I don’t reckon this is a good sign. I mean look at the number of threads about duck dynasty as compared to the threads about what is going on in New Mexico and Utah.
I mean if the Utah thing stands or whatever, that’s 17 states that have accepted it or will accept it. I dunno, I’m not saying things like Chick-fil-A and duck dynasty aren’t important, it’s just that maybe a state accepting it should be a bigger deal than it seems to have become.
Now that's a good example of a loaded question.
Yes indeed Fox is going down the tubes. Hannity may end up being the last man standing. They already marginalized him to an hour later for eye candy Kelly.
Fox is stacked with fiscal conservatives and lacks the moral conservatism it had 10 years ago. You are correct they have caved to the gay agenda and give lip service to Life issues.
I would like to see Palin get a show or Rick Santorum on the network. But I am sure they both have bigger plans:)
Thanks for posting this article.
Hollywood is faggy. As is the interior decoration global conglomerate. Wanna get a job as a department store display windows designing engineer?
You have a valid point, however this DD deal is a clear rallying call. It is a clear example of the sodomite theophobes demanding acceptance and exposing that they never meant tolerance. They portrayed themselves as victims and now everyone is seeing just how much these fringe 2 presenters are little Maos looking to lop off heads.
Well.... The homosexual minority is a majority in most of the forms of the news and entertainment media.
The news and entertainment media is the 'power'.
We give it power much like the Romans who went to watch at the coliseum. We're even sacrificing the Christians, just like they did. Pretty much for the same reason.
“It is a clear example of the sodomite theophobes demanding acceptance and exposing that they never meant tolerance.”
That’s true. The guy said nothing outrageous. At all.
But I dunno, I don’t think it’s a good sign when an obvious garbage network like A&E gets more coverage in it’s obvious and predictable action for what the duck dude said than an actual state of the union accepting gay marriage. Not that rallying points are unimportant, but I don’t think it would have been this way ten years ago. I just can’t see something that impacts cable TV being as meaningful as a whole state government succumbing to the homosexualist agenda. Something is wrong with the ratio of coverage here, in my opinion.
Neither Utah or NM voted for homosexual “marriage”. It was forced on the people by activist legislatures. 17 states so far and only two were approved by a vote of the people, Maryland and Washington State. Washington State same-sex “marriage” was financed by filty rich liberals in the Seattle area, the biggest supporter being Microsoft, and out of state money. Activist out-spend supporters of REAL marriage 9-1 and still only got 53% of the vote. California liberals have ruined Washington State. The area east of the Cascades should have broken away years ago.
>> I stand with Phil, Paul, God, and all that is good.
This is what they call a “watershed”.
Evil goes one way, good the other.
I skipped ahead to the end of the Book, and Good wins. ;-)
Stay the course, and God bless you.
I fully understand but by your handle I gather you knew things will be getting worse by the day. The PAGAN leftist alliance will continue to win battles but they will lose the war when our King returns. Until then we keep up the good fight in His Name and do His work.
On New Mexico and Utah, well the states caving on gay marriage is all part of the RINO master plan. The RINOs have caved on moral issues and are vying to become a one issue party catering to the country club elite. They surrendered on pro life in 2008 and 2012, and now have signed a peace treaty meeting all the demands of the sodomite lobby. Let’s hope the Tea Party can save the soul of the party.
>> Even though I stand with good, it doesnt matter.
It DOES!!! matter.
>> Who has the most power seems to matter, and it would seem that the homosexual minority has the power.
Appearances can be deceiving. Don’t be deceived. There is right, and there is wrong. Homosexual behavior and the homosexual lifestyle is wrong. Standing in opposition to homosexual behavior is right.
Are you sure about that? From what I read both state supreme courts ruled to grant under “equal” protections. That’s worse given judicial fiat is now deciding most of the changes.
Christians have no sense if they take the Bible literally???? HE has no SENSE if he can’t tell the difference between literal and figurative. The Bible has both. And the verses on homosexuality can ONLY be taken as “literal.” What does he think God REALLY meant to say when He said homosexuality is an abomination?
.....Or FORCES good to FIGHT BACK BIGTIIME.
“Who has the most power seems to matter, and it would seem that the homosexual minority has the power.
Well.... The homosexual minority is a majority in most of the forms of the news and entertainment media.
The news and entertainment media is the ‘power’.
We give it power much like the Romans who went to watch at the coliseum. We’re even sacrificing the Christians, just like they did. Pretty much for the same reason.”
Yet the more the “sacrificing” that is done, the more “seeds” of new or future believers is being planted by the day.
Actually it wasn’t the gay mafia, it was the pro gay CEO of A&E that pulled the trigger.
Utah passed it’s amendment by 66% in 2004. New Mexico never voted for an amendment, but if it had I would think it would have only passed it in the low 50% ranges.
“It was forced on the people by activist legislatures.”
I thought both were judicial decisions?
If you look at the voting trends of the popular votes held on ‘gay marriage’ they are not positive, in my opinion. Last year NC voted their amendment in by 61%, and was considered a great victory by many. But really 61% just ties the CA prop. 22 ballot of 2000. So NC is around 12 years behind CA on ‘gay marriage’—which probably would have been called crazy if someone predicted that in 2000.
All that you say here is true, I guess I was just pointing out that it’s strange that there is all this coverage of a cable TV reality show as opposed to two whole state governments officially accepting ‘gay marriage,’ despite one of them having an actual constitutional amendment in place. Within days or even hours of each other.
Activist legislatures or activist judges. The point is the PEOPLE didn’t make the call. All knowing government officials did.
Sodomite “marriage” will NEVER PASS in any Southern State, with the exception of Florida, which has been taken over by northeast liberals. But it’s not going to have to pass a vote of the people. The republican controlled US Supreme Court will give the country SODOMITE “MARRIAGE” the first time two fags bring a lawsuit to the court. Kennedy and Roberts will vote with the liberals. Mark it down.
“Sodomite marriage will NEVER PASS in any Southern State, with the exception of Florida, which has been taken over by northeast liberals.”
15 years ago nobody would have ever believed you if you would have told them that in 2012 39% of voters in NC would find ‘gay marriage’ acceptable. Good grief, they would have thought you were nuts if you would have told them it would be accepted ANYWHERE 30 years ago.
Now like you say it’s much more likely our black robed masters simply cut out the middlemen and impose it before any Southern state would ever accept it by popular vote. But all anyone has to do is look at the popular votes on the issue, when they passed, where they passed, by how much. It’s not like the amendments have been passing by more and more. Every state around NC except Va passed theirs by 75%+. But they also passed them from 6 to 8 years before NC. Would they have been as low as 61% if they voted on them now? No way, in my opinion. Would they be higher than what they originally passed them by? No way in my opinion.
I think it would be difficult to call a legislature voted by the people as activist unless said legislature voted for some measure they campaigned against. That has happened as we saw in New York’s gay “marriage” vote.
The courts are another matter. They are normally appointed by the executive of the state.
And when NC and any other state enshrined it in the Constitution as being one man and one woman, does not mean squat if the 9 unelected sll-powerful decision makers rule it unconstitutional. There was a time when the laws of states came before the Feds, not anymore. We are all slaves to the robed few in Washington DC. “The great tribunal has spoken, resistence is futile”. George Orwell would be pleased he has been proven right time and time again.
“That has happened as we saw in New Yorks gay marriage vote”.
The NY legislature consistently voted against homosexual “marriage”. The few republican CATHOLICS that held all the cards said no every time it was brought up. Enter cafeteria catholic Cuomo, the most radical pro-abortion and pro-homo “marriage” politician in the country, who proudly stands with the devil and immorality, and he made a “deal they couldn’t refuse” to these hold-out “catholic” politicians, and the ones that had always said no to homo “marriage” flipped and gave the people of the state homosexual “marriage” whether they wanted it or not.
I agree with your concern on the matters at hand. On the one we have the gay agenda, by judicial fiat advancing in the here an now. On the other a reality backwoods Christian outdoorsman representing a TV program. With the bearded man gaining all the news and attention. Fully see your point and concerns.
On the flip side, I think the DD event woke up many who were asleep, were passive or did not care what gay people did as long as it did not rock their ‘world.’ That is at issue here. Some who thought “live and let live” was living a tolerant Christian life are now realizing the gay agenda was never about equality and tolerance, but acceptance and dominance of their leftist worldviews. And with forced acceptance comes silencing of opposing views. When silence is broken, as with Phil, then the consequences of not accepting the leftist worldviews. We are seeing that in action now.
For what it’s worth in the past 48 hours I have seen Prots and Roman Catholics more unified for the cause of morality than I have seen in many years. All because a repentant hippie backwoods outdoorsman stood his ground in defending God’s Word.
Perhaps we should all see the advantages offered us and more importantly, what our Lord may be telling us.
Well said (i help write it by God's grace).
Oops. I meant i helped write the material at the link, not what you said. Sorry.
Excellent write up. Thanks and bookmarked.
Well, of course if it is accomplishing this it can’t be too bad a thing. But I’m not sure it is healthy for the argument to have SO many stories on it as opposed to ones about actual states being forced to accept ‘gay marriage.’
I also recall that the election following the Chick-fil-A deal was the one where ‘gay marriage’ was accepted or at least not rejected by popular ballots in some actual states. Seems to me again one of those stories had way more coverage than the other.