Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RC Sproul's Commentary on John. FREE ON KINDLE TODAY
Amazon.com ^ | RC Sproul

Posted on 01/03/2014 10:33:49 AM PST by P-Marlowe

The Gospel of John Commentary by RC Sproul is now FREE on Amazon!

RC Sproul has been offering a number of great books for free.

Matt 10:8 Freely you have received. Freely Give.

Check it out!


TOPICS: Evangelical Christian; Mainline Protestant; Theology
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: xzins

Partial, hardly any difference from the full preterists. Is there such a thing as partial pregnant?


21 posted on 01/03/2014 2:47:19 PM PST by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

I’m a Historic Premill, I agree with your assessment of Zionism.

Historic Premill is the alternative you should consider. Most of the Preterist/Amillennialist view point out the errors of dispensationalism, then falsely presenting their view as the only alternative.


22 posted on 01/03/2014 2:55:27 PM PST by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sasportas
Partial, hardly any difference from the full preterists.

Hardly any difference, except a belief in a literal resurrection and a literal Second Coming. But why let that get in your way?

23 posted on 01/03/2014 2:58:23 PM PST by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sasportas
"The Bible is a fallible collection of infallible books" -- R.C. Sproul
24 posted on 01/03/2014 3:02:44 PM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sasportas

Yeah, but the full preterists are “fullish”.

We all are a little partial in terms of things fulfilled. To be fair, though, even the partial preterists go way too far in their finding of things fulfilled.

I choke, though, at the 70 AD return of Christ. Gotta admit, that one is too big to swallow. :>)


25 posted on 01/03/2014 3:04:27 PM PST by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

I think the fulls are correct in calling the partials “inconsistent” preterists. At least the fulls are consistent.

Both interpret the Olivet discourse (Matthew and Mark), and the whole of Revelation as already fulfilled in the past. That’s where they, partials and fulls, have gone around the bend, in my view.

Despite the fact that the resurrection and 2nd coming are intrinsic to the Olivet discourse (conflating the Thessalonian epistles with it), the partials caught so much heat they opted to remove both from the standard “this generation shall not pass” scenario. I think they were inconsistent, and dishonest, in doing it.

If you are going to use “this generation shall not pass” as preterists, partial and full, apply it to the Olivet discourse, then, to be consistent, the resurrection and 2nd coming had to have taken place in 70 AD.


26 posted on 01/03/2014 4:17:30 PM PST by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Yeah, I choke with you, and so did the partials. See my last post.


27 posted on 01/03/2014 4:32:21 PM PST by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson