Posted on 01/08/2014 1:11:34 PM PST by DouglasKC
"Ecumenical threads are closed to antagonism."
"To antagonize is to incur or to provoke hostility in others."
"Unlike the caucus threads, the article and reply posts of an ecumenical thread may discuss more than one belief, but antagonism is not tolerable."
"Contrasting of beliefs or even criticisms can be made without provoking hostilities. But when in doubt, only post what you are for and not what you are against. Or ask questions."
"Ecumenical threads will be moderated on a where theres smoke, theres fire basis. When hostility has broken out on an ecumenical thread, Ill be looking for the source."
"Therefore anti posters must not try to finesse the guidelines by asking loaded questions, using inflammatory taglines, gratuitous quote mining or trying to slip in an anti or ex article under the color of the ecumenical tag."
Scriptural evidence of the divinity of Christ...
Jesus is the God of the Old Testament, the Great Jehovah
He certainly is...thanks for the insight.
Amen
The author left out the verse that opened my eyes.
John: “In the beginning was the word. And the word became flesh and dwelt among us.”
Yup, great scripture and a clear statement on the father and son in the beginning. Clearly shows that John believed that the Jesus Christ was God. Thanks for bringing it to remembrance.
For which sect are you claiming caucus protection from critique?
Not sure of your question brother. I'm pointing out scriptures that show that the disciples of Jesus Christ, my Lord, considered him to be God the creator. Do you disagree?
I may have mistakenly called you “brother”. If you’re female I meant “sister”. My apologies.
I’m puzzled. Do we really have that many Arian heretics on FR that you need a caucus notice on this thread? The divinity of Christ has been an uncontroversial issue among Christians since sometime in the fifth century (okay, the Lombard court only abandoned Arianism in the sixth century and some Lombards held on to the heresy a bit longer — I’ve heard claims as late as the 12th century — but everywhere else...)
If you want to point to Scriptural evidence of Jesus’ divinity, you’re missing the place where he says “Before Abraham was I AM”. The Jews understood what he meant, whether He spoke Greek or Aramaic or Hebrew, He claimed the name God gave to Moses, either translated or in Hebrew, as His own, which is why they tried to stone Him at that point.
I'm a 68 years old male, BTW.
It's an ecumenical thread my friend. People are free to disagree with the premise of article.
If you want to point to Scriptural evidence of Jesus divinity, youre missing the place where he says Before Abraham was I AM. The Jews understood what he meant, whether He spoke Greek or Aramaic or Hebrew, He claimed the name God gave to Moses, either translated or in Hebrew, as His own, which is why they tried to stone Him at that point.
Great points and scripture. Thanks for bringing them up.
I’m not sure of where you’re getting your information from my friend. This is not a caucus thread. It’s ecumenical designed to promote reasoned discussion of the topic and keep it free of flame wars. Thanks for your cooperation.
UCG apparently, according to the article's URL/link.
Again, my apologies. I'm a 52 year old male.
Oops! Excerpted from an UCG book, too.
Hello my friend. Please refrain from submitting incorrect and inflammatory links.
RM, can you please delete the post? Thanks!
That’s not to say that you should’t make contributions to the thread. Do you believe, as I do, that our Lord Jesus Christ was affirmed to be God by his disciples?
Tell me more!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.