Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: mdmathis6
First, no Christian church, denomination or congregation (with the possible exception of the Unitarian-Universalists, if you want to call them Christians) approved of contraception until 1930. That was when the Church of England broke ranks and OK'd contraception at their decennial Lambeth Conference. At the time that this happened, it was universally identified as a break with the historic beliefs of all Christendom.

So this was not a distinctive Catholic "thing". All of Christendom --- Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox --- had understood for 2 millennia what was going on in Genesis 38, and had understood that God had instituted procreation as one of the goods of marriage, and hated what Onan had done to reject and sabotage His fruitful design for sexuality.

I don't think God would allow the entire Christian community and all its various sub-communities to be misled about this for 2 millennia, only to vouchsafe His real, holy, contraceptive intentions to the Anglicans, of all people.

[Sorry,Anglicans, I love ya but I had to say that.]

To answer your second question: the Catholic Church bases her teaching on Divine and Natural Law. Divine Law tells us from Genesis to Revelation that marital union was designed to be both unitive and fruitful, that it is a good when it is, and a bitter misfortune when it is not. There is not a single instance in the OT where births are not identified as blessings, and where sterility is not identified as a sign of people rejecting God, or God chastising His people.

Natural Law tells us that it is ethical to use drugs, devices and surgery to restore and strengthen natural physiological function, and unethical to intentionally impair or injure normal, natural function.

IOW, it's not virtuous to sabotage the healthy body. We are not the masters of the source of life. We are the ministers of God's design.

Do you believe that human sexuality embodies God's design?

48 posted on 02/14/2014 11:41:49 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Sanity is the adequate response of the mind to the real thing: adaequatio mentis ad rem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: Mrs. Don-o; mdmathis6
If Onan had, instead, waited until Tamar was in her “infertile” period and had uninterrupted sexual intercourse with her, would he have been allowed to live by God?
62 posted on 02/14/2014 3:39:17 PM PST by boatbums (Simul justis et peccator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson