Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Satan is right now shaking the Church to her very foundations over this divorce issue
Inside the Vatican Magazine, Letter to the Editor ^ | February 2014 | Fr. Brian W. Harrison, O.S.

Posted on 03/08/2014 8:49:47 AM PST by Brian Kopp DPM

Dear Dr. Moynihan,
 
      In your latest Letter from Rome, commenting on the new appointments to the College of Cardinals, you report rather nonchalantly that "[Archbishop Gerhard Ludwig] Müller is also known for having said that the Church's position on admitting to divorced and remarried Catholics to the sacrament of Communion is not something that can or will be changed. But other German Church leaders, including Cardinal Walter Kasper, have recently gone on record saying the teaching may and will be changed."
 
     Your brief, matter-of-fact report on this controversy reminds me of the tip of an iceberg. It alludes to, but does not reveal the immensity of, a massive, looming threat that bids fair to pierce, penetrate and rend in twain Peter's barque – already tossing perilously amid stormy and icy seas. The shocking magnitude of the doctrinal and pastoral crisis lurking beneath  this politely-worded dispute between scholarly German prelates can scarcely be overstated. For what is at stake here is fidelity to a teaching of Jesus Christ that directly and profoundly affects the lives of hundreds of millions of Catholics: the indissolubility of marriage.
 
      The German bishops have devised a pastoral plan to admit divorced and remarried Catholics to Communion, whether or not a Church tribunal has granted a decree of nullity of their first marriage. Cardinal-elect Müller, as Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, has not only published a strong article in L'Osservatore Romano reaffirming the perennial Catholic doctrine confirmed by John Paul II in Familiaris Consortio; he has also written officially to the German Bishops' Conference telling them to rectify their heterodox pastoral plan. But the bishops, led by their conference president and by Cardinal Kasper, are openly defying the head of the CDF, and predicting that the existing doctrine and discipline will soon be changed!
 
     Think of the appalling ramifications of this. If German Catholics don't need decrees of nullity, neither will any Catholics anywhere. Won't the world's Catholic marriage tribunals then become basically irrelevant? (Will they eventually just close down?) And won't this reversal of bimillennial Catholic doctrine mean that the Protestants and Orthodox, who have allowed divorce and remarriage for century after century, have been more docile to the Holy Spirit on this issue than the true Church of Christ? Indeed, how credible, now, will be her claim to be the true Church? On what other controverted issues, perhaps, has the Catholic Church been wrong, and the separated brethren right?
 
       And what of Jesus' teaching that those who remarry after divorce commit adultery? Admitting them to Communion without a commitment to continence will lead logically to one of three faith-breaking conclusions: (a) our Lord was mistaken in calling this relationship adulterous - in which case he can scarcely have been the Son of God; (b) adultery is not intrinsically and gravely sinful - in which case the Church's universal and ordinary magisterium has always been wrong; or (c) Communion can be given to some who are living in objectively grave sin - in which case not only has the magisterium also erred monumentally by always teaching the opposite, but the way will also be opened to Communion for fornicators, practicing homosexuals, pederasts, and who knows who else? (And, please, spare us the sophistry that Jesus' teaching was correct "in his own historical and cultural context", but that since about Martin Luther's time that has all changed.)
 
       Let us make no mistake: Satan is right now shaking the Church to her very foundations over this divorce issue. If anything, the confusion is becoming even graver than that over contraception between 1965 and 1968, when Paul VI's seeming vacillation allowed Catholics round the world to anticipate a reversal of perennial Church teaching. If the present Successor of Peter now keeps silent about divorce and remarriage, thereby tacitly telling the Church and the world that the teaching of Jesus Christ will be up for open debate at a forthcoming Synod of Bishops, one fears a terrible price will soon have to be paid.
 
         Fr. Brian W. Harrison, O.S.
        St. Louis, Missouri


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: divorce; spiritualwarfare
If anything, the confusion is becoming even graver than that over contraception between 1965 and 1968, when Paul VI's seeming vacillation allowed Catholics round the world to anticipate a reversal of perennial Church teaching. If the present Successor of Peter now keeps silent about divorce and remarriage, thereby tacitly telling the Church and the world that the teaching of Jesus Christ will be up for open debate at a forthcoming Synod of Bishops, one fears a terrible price will soon have to be paid.

Indeed.

1 posted on 03/08/2014 8:49:47 AM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brian Kopp DPM

He needs to get in front of this or it will bury him.


2 posted on 03/08/2014 8:55:45 AM PST by pbear8 (the Lord is my light and my salvation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Kopp DPM

Divorce-remarriage is the slippery slope to homosexual marriage.


3 posted on 03/08/2014 8:55:52 AM PST by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Kopp DPM
Won't the world's Catholic marriage tribunals then become basically irrelevant? (Will they eventually just close down?)

It should be possible to retain the tribunals for their original purpose - factual disputes over consent and objective externals such as age and fraud.

However, it is the tens or hundreds of thousands of tribunal verdicts which are being procured illegitimately that are the earthquake. I believe the bishops (most of them) would much prefer to divert the "I was immature" or "I didn't understand" cases into some other forum. This would actually improve the tribunal process considerably.

I also think the verdict is already in, as expressed by Francis and by ++Kasper - they are going for the EO "sacramental economy" solution for the vast majority of "I made a mistake, just tell me how to lie about it" cases. There are so many of these people, and so many spouses and children, who are now outside of the sacramental system of the Church that, I believe, there is a spirit that "something must be done".

Just my 2c.

4 posted on 03/08/2014 9:00:44 AM PST by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Kopp DPM
Yep, once again, the (Germanic) barbarians are at the gates of Rome. Good to see, though, that a few such as Fr Harrison are not burying their heads in the sand regarding the reality of what's happening.

It's no sort of 'mercy' or 'pastoral care' to stop telling people the truth.
5 posted on 03/08/2014 9:01:33 AM PST by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Kopp DPM

I agree completely with Father Harrison. Don’t open the door to still more problems.


6 posted on 03/08/2014 9:13:19 AM PST by kitkat (STORM THE HEAVENS WITH PRAYERS FOR OUR COUNTRY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Kopp DPM

Indeed.
BTTT


7 posted on 03/08/2014 9:15:27 AM PST by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

Not as much as premarital sex, and porn is.

NO-FAULT divorce, yes. But not for legitimate reasons, which I would include to be actual physically dangerous spouses of both sexes. Or those that will not stop addictive gambling and alcohol and destroying the family that way.


8 posted on 03/08/2014 9:17:31 AM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Brian Kopp DPM

Anyone opposed to divorce is welcome to spend a week with my ex-wife.


9 posted on 03/08/2014 9:17:51 AM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

Amen! and “Gay”- “Marriage” is an Abomination of the largest proportions!


10 posted on 03/08/2014 9:17:57 AM PST by MeshugeMikey (Jesus came to Save not Entertain / Ground John Kerry Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Might she say the same about her ex-husband?


11 posted on 03/08/2014 9:21:55 AM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

> Not as much as premarital sex, and porn is.

Good point.

> NO-FAULT divorce, yes. But not for legitimate reasons,
> which I would include to be actual physically dangerous
> spouses of both sexes. Or those that will not stop
> addictive gambling and alcohol and destroying the family
> that way.

As far as I can tell, there are only two legitimate reasons for divorce.

1. Fornication, which is any kind of sexual infidelity, including porn

2. Abandonment

However, I do not see any license to remarry after a divorce.

Of course, once it’s fait accomplis, then the sinner must repent (never do it again), and move on in confidence that God has forgiven the believer of all his transgressions.


12 posted on 03/08/2014 9:22:09 AM PST by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

Abandonment could be read many ways. Physically leaving or addiction (mentally leaving).


13 posted on 03/08/2014 9:38:56 AM PST by Ghost of SVR4 (So many are so hopelessly dependent on the government that they will fight to protect it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Brian Kopp DPM
Might she say the same about her ex-husband?

Absolutely.

She'll cheerfully and sincerely tell you that I am the devil incarnate.

Regardless, we remained excellent friends and communicate frequently and raised outstanding kidlets.

We just shouldn't be in the same house for any time longer than an hour or so.

14 posted on 03/08/2014 9:47:30 AM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
I believe the bishops (most of them) would much prefer to divert the "I was immature" or "I didn't understand" cases into some other forum.

I recall my daughter remarking on this once when she was in college. Her comment was that her peers had been so inadequately catechized that they really didn't know what they were getting into when they married. Their marriages were probably invalid because they didn't know enough to give proper consent.

She may have been right. That was already a generation ago.

15 posted on 03/08/2014 9:51:54 AM PST by JoeFromSidney (Book: Resistance to Tyranny. Buy from Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brian Kopp DPM

Considering that people like Robert Kennedy jr. was granted an annulment, I really don’t think much of all the hew and cry


16 posted on 03/08/2014 10:18:12 AM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

nicely played


17 posted on 03/08/2014 10:18:38 AM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brian Kopp DPM
The media propaganda machine is running every CINO professor, "theologian", priest, and bishop they can find as well as spinning whatever anyone faithful has to say. It's a replay of the media campaign about contraception that played out in the sixties.

The Pope delaying a statement then made things worse and it looks like this Pope is going the same route.

18 posted on 03/08/2014 11:07:21 AM PST by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

The solution to these examples is already available in the Catholic Church, annulment. The divorce talk is only to create controversy and chip away at peoples faith. The Church has been around the block and has positions well thought out that are centuries old. Most the Catholics I know are not shopping for a new religion that sees thing their way. They accept the value in the rules and try to keep them.


19 posted on 03/08/2014 12:51:45 PM PST by spudville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Brian Kopp DPM
But the bishops, led by their conference president and by Cardinal Kasper, are openly defying the head of the CDF, and predicting that the existing doctrine and discipline will soon be changed!

And instead of Pope Francis putting the German bishops firmly in their place, he gives their point man, Kasper (who has repeatedly proclaimed to the media that the pope will soon be making changes) the honor of launching the discussions and then publicly praises his theology. No wonder expectations are being raised. Though doctrine can't be changed, it is starting to appear as though some sort of compromise may be in the works in regard to practice. The pope may institute new "pastoral" approaches to this issue under the guise of mercy which will result in effectively undermining doctrine. If such plans are not under discussion, why did Cardinal Maradiaga (one of the pope's Gang of 8) chide the Prefect for his inflexibility, and why would Cardinal Kasper and company be permitted such open defiance of Church teaching and Kasper allowed to promote his schismatic views to the College of Cardinals?

20 posted on 03/08/2014 12:54:28 PM PST by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Kopp DPM

“If the present Successor of Peter now keeps silent about divorce and remarriage, thereby tacitly telling the Church and the world that the teaching of Jesus Christ will be up for open debate at a forthcoming Synod of Bishops, one fears a terrible price will soon have to be paid.”

Fr. Brian Harrison is one great priest. He’s swimming upstream against these neo-Modernists, but his take-no-prisoners style is certainly refreshing.


21 posted on 03/08/2014 2:47:18 PM PST by tomsbartoo (St Pius X watch over us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

there’s no indication in scripture that divorced people can’t remarry, especially the one who didn’t cheat/wasn’t abandoned.


22 posted on 03/08/2014 5:27:59 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

> there’s no indication in scripture that divorced people
> can’t remarry, especially the one who didn’t cheat/wasn’t
> abandoned.

From the words of Jesus Himself ...

Mt 5:32 But I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.

Mt 19:9 And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery.

Mr 10:11 And he saith unto them, Whosoever shall put away his wife, and marry another, committeth adultery against her.

Mr 10:12 And if a woman shall put away her husband, and be married to another, she committeth adultery.

Lu 16:18 Whosoever putteth away his wife, and marrieth another, committeth adultery: and whosoever marrieth her that is put away from her husband committeth adultery.


23 posted on 03/08/2014 6:21:45 PM PST by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

jesus noted exceptions and they are allowed to remarry.


24 posted on 03/08/2014 6:41:07 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

> jesus noted exceptions and they are allowed to remarry.

The only exception I see is fornication, which encompasses basically any kind of sex outside of marriage as defined by God, one man with one woman for life.

This is a very difficult subject, indeed.

In 1st Corinthians chapter 7, Paul indicates that abandonment is also legitimate grounds for divorce, but he reasserts what Jesus said about it in Romans 7:3

Ro 7:3 So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man.


25 posted on 03/08/2014 9:48:37 PM PST by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

But was Christ speaking of a civil divorce?


26 posted on 03/09/2014 5:37:46 AM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: piusv

> But was Christ speaking of a civil divorce?

Christ was talking about sexual morality in the sight of God.

Split hairs all you want. He said what He said. It’s plain enough for all to understand.


27 posted on 03/09/2014 5:41:06 AM PDT by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

No, I’m not splitting hairs. My point is that when Christ spoke of “divorce” He was speaking of getting one from the religious authorities, not the civil authorities (like the Catholic teaching on annulments). He, in no way meant, “yeah, you can go get a divorce from the Roman authorities and that’s way cool with God.”


28 posted on 03/09/2014 5:47:17 AM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Brian Kopp DPM
Thanks for posting this great "letter to the editor", Brian Kopp DPM.    Fr. Harrison is obviously not one of these wobbly, wishy-washy members of the clergy (or laity) who strive for a non-confrontational blending with the dominant sinful culture, rather than a strict adherence to the clear teachings of God.

In an effort to be more popular, some misguided and wrongheaded Catholics (from the laity, to even some members high in the Church hierarchy, such as Cardinal Walter Kasper), foolishly seek to change teachings first laid down by Jesus Christ, and are aiding and abetting Satan, the father of all lies.

Man does not tell God what is right and wrong (no matter how high he is in the Church hierarchy) -- God tells man what is right and wrong, and anyone who thinks otherwise is simply wrong.

If I'm not mistaken, the writer of this letter to the editor, Fr. Brian W. Harrison, is a convert to Catholicism who is prominently featured at the



"Coming Home Network"

and in EWTN's Marcus Grodi's book,



"Journeys Home" -- Collected and Edited By Marcus Grodi

God bless Fr. Harrison for standing up for the Truth in these crazy and perilous times.

29 posted on 03/09/2014 7:07:38 AM PDT by Heart-Rest ("Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap." Gal 6:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson