Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cardinal Burke opposes Cardinal Kasper's proposal for divorced/remarried Catholics
Catholic Culture ^ | March 21, 2014 | Diogenes

Posted on 03/22/2014 10:26:36 AM PDT by NYer

Cardinal Raymond Burke has voiced a clear disagreement with Cardinal Walter Kasper’s proposal for a new approach to allow Communion for Catholics who are divorced and remarried.

Appearing on the EWTN TV broadcast of “The World Over,” Cardinal Burke told host Raymond Arroyo that Cardinal Kasper’s proposal, introduced at a February consistory of the world’s cardinals, would seem to conflict with established Catholic doctrine and canon law.

“In my estimation as a canonist I do not think it is possible,” said Cardinal Burke, who is the prefect of the Apostolic Signatura, the Church’s top canonical tribunal. He added: “I trust in coming days… the error of his approach will become ever clearer."

Cardinal Burke pointed out that Cardinal Kasper’s address was delivered to the cardinals during a meeting at which discussions were originally intended to be confidential. But since the thrust of the German cardinal’s proposal had become widely known, he said, he felt obligated to report that Cardinal Kasper’s ideas had met with some resistance among the cardinals.

Additional sources for this story
Some links will take you to other sites, in a new window.



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Moral Issues; Worship
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 03/22/2014 10:26:36 AM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; GregB; Berlin_Freeper; SumProVita; narses; bboop; SevenofNine; Ronaldus Magnus; tiki; ...

Click the EWTN link to watch the full interview.


2 posted on 03/22/2014 10:27:01 AM PDT by NYer ("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
God bless Cardinal Burke! Let's hope that he isn't suddenly demoted for his frank comments.

We're living in troubling times. What happens when a seemingly unstoppable force (revolutionary modernists in the Catholic hierarchy) runs into an immovable object (Catholic doctrine)? We shall see...
3 posted on 03/22/2014 10:44:05 AM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer; Tax-chick; GregB; Berlin_Freeper; SumProVita; narses; bboop; SevenofNine; Ronaldus Magnus; ...

For good, bad, or indifferent. The discussion should be held and under confidentiality so that all views and reasons can be discussed.

Whether or not to actually change Catholic doctrine/dogma, I see that as a separate and profound decision.


4 posted on 03/22/2014 10:49:14 AM PDT by GreyFriar ( Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

I don’t think anything is going to change at all.


5 posted on 03/22/2014 11:04:31 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler
Let's hope that he isn't suddenly demoted for his frank comments.

You read my mind.

6 posted on 03/22/2014 11:20:15 AM PDT by piusv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar; Salvation
Whether or not to actually change Catholic doctrine/dogma, I see that as a separate and profound decision.

I agree with Salvation. Throughout the 2000 year history of the Catholic Church, there have been many such discussions on a myriad of topics. We have assurance from Christ that not even the gates of hell will prevail against His Church (Matthew 16:18).

7 posted on 03/22/2014 11:21:15 AM PDT by NYer ("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler; piusv
Let's hope that he isn't suddenly demoted for his frank comments.

PFL

"It is reminded that in the Church, when it is a question of accusations against a cardinal, the competence belongs only to the Pope; other entities can have a consultative function, always with due respect for the persons."
-- from the thread Pope Clarifies That Only He Can Criticize a Cardinal

8 posted on 03/22/2014 11:34:59 AM PDT by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Salvation; NYer

Salvation you said:

I don’t think anything is going to change at all.

And like Nyer, I agree with you. But, as the line from the play 1776:

Hopkins: Well, in all my years I ain’t never heard, seen nor smelled an issue that was so dangerous it couldn’t be talked about. Hell yeah! I’m for debating anything. Rhode Island says yea!

To hold a discussion and current moods/points of view, does not mean that it will result in a or that there even needs to be a change.

G-F


9 posted on 03/22/2014 11:53:44 AM PDT by GreyFriar ( Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: piusv
This has been in the works for 40 years, Kasper has the current Pope's ear, it's happening.

THE INDISSOLUBILITY OF MARRIAGE:

10 posted on 03/22/2014 12:38:02 PM PDT by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NYer; Salvation; GreyFriar
Cardinal Burke made a point in that EWTN interview of mentioning how that teaching on marriage came directly from the mouth of our Lord Jesus Christ (as recorded in the Gospels), to underscore why that teaching is not one that can be changed in any kind of substantial way, no matter what Cardinal Kasper or anyone else says or hopes for.

They may be able to tweek the process of applying for and investigating facts for possible annulments a little, in order to streamline and speed up that whole process a bit, without sacrificing the integrity of the process, and at the same time not try to change the Church's doctrines on receiving communion in any way, which would make the Holy Spirit contradict Himself in His unerring guidance of the Church concerning her actual teachings (which He cannot and will not do).

You also don't want to end up with an express lane for approvals of possible annulments that are not truly justified, but like some elderly drivers who do 10 miles an hour in a 55 MPH zone, it probably wouldn't hurt to apply just a tad more leverage to the gas pedal (so to speak), and arrive at a slightly less cumbersome and more timely and cost-effective decision making process, which still fully honors the integrity of the whole annulment investigatory stage through its conclusion, for the people it applies to.

11 posted on 03/22/2014 7:53:40 PM PDT by Heart-Rest ("Our hearts are restless, Lord, until they rest in Thee." - St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I love this man.


12 posted on 03/22/2014 8:19:38 PM PDT by ottbmare (the OTTB mare, now a proud Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson