If you're disagreeing with "Inconclusive", okay we can disagree.
If you're disagreeing with the rest of it, I used the word "could" to indicate possibility and therefore you seem to be disagreeing that what I posited is even possible. I suppose we can disagree on what is possible.
I was going to just let your post go, but you wrote:
My writing down the statement “Jesus was an epileptic” on this message board should have to be proven authentic and not disproven as inauthentic.
And:
Additionally, since there is no previous information to that effect, then it should automatically be assumed to be inauthentic with a huge burden of proof on anyone claiming such to be the case, and especially if it includes my claim written in the year 2014, many years after His having been on earth.
So, can you prove your statements:
"...should have to be proven authentic and not disproven as inauthentic."
"...there is no previous information to that effect..."
"...should automatically be assumed to be inauthentic with a huge burden of proof on anyone claiming such to be the case..."
Jesus was not an epileptic.
That was the assertion. That is what I have to prove.
I can’t. No way to do it that I can see.
Jesus had a wife.
That was the assertion. That is what King had to prove.
She couldn’t. No way to do it that I can see.