Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Makes Christianity Look Silly’: Creationist Ken Ham Unleashes on Pat Robertson
The Blaze ^ | May 15, 2014 | Billy Hallowell

Posted on 05/16/2014 12:34:41 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Young earth creationist Ken Ham lashed out at televangelist Pat Robertson over his claim earlier this week that someone has to be “deaf, dumb and blind” to believe that the Earth is only 6,000 years old, accusing Robertson of compromising “the Word of God.”

“Pat Robertson illustrates one of the biggest problems we have today in the church — people like Robertson compromise the Word of God with the pagan ideas of fallible men!,” Ham wrote on his Facebook page. “Pat Robertson is not upholding the Word of God with his ridiculous statements — he is undermining the authority of the Word. And any attack on the WORD is an attack on the person of Jesus Christ, who IS THE WORD!”

Ham, who runs Answers in Genesis, a Christian ministry that takes the Bible’s Genesis account of creation literally, broke down the comments Robertson made on CBN’s “The 700 Club” earlier this week in a point-by-point analysis.

In addition to accusing Roberson of expressing “his utter ignorance of science,” Ham wrote that the televangelist “makes Christianity look silly.”

But Ham took particular exception to Robertson’s claim that there is no way that the Earth could have possibly come to fruition in such a short time span.

“Really Pat Robertson? You mean there is no way God, the infinite Creator, could not have created the universe in six days just six thousand years ago?,” Ham rhetorically asked. “God could have created everything in six seconds if He wanted [to]! And it’s not a matter of what you think anyway — it’s a matter of what God has clearly told us in His infallible WORD!”

As TheBlaze previously reported, Robertson unleashed his critiques on young earth creationists Tuesday, saying that they are mistaken in their views about the age of the planet.

“The truth is, you have to be deaf, dumb and blind to think that this Earth that we live in only has 6,000 years of existence, it just doesn’t, I’m sorry,” Robertson said.

He added, “I think what we’re looking at is that there was a point of time after the Earth was created, after these things were done, after the universe was formed, after the asteroid hit the Earth and wiped out the dinosaurs — after that, there was a point of time that there was a particular human being that God touched — and that was the human that started the race that we are now part of.”

Watch Robertson’s comments below:

(VIDEO-AT-LINK)


TOPICS: Charismatic Christian; Evangelical Christian; Religion & Science; Theology
KEYWORDS: creation; creationism; kenham; patrobertson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-253 next last
To: LearsFool

I never said that I didn’t acknowledge God, did I? In which thread # did you read that?


41 posted on 05/16/2014 8:28:52 AM PDT by redhawk.44mag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: redhawk.44mag

When you suggest that men wrote the Bible, and that what He says are miracles really aren’t, you’re calling God a liar.


42 posted on 05/16/2014 8:39:28 AM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: LearsFool

No I’m not.


43 posted on 05/16/2014 8:42:57 AM PDT by redhawk.44mag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; Gamecock

On the contrary. If God’s word is untrue regarding the creation, it is untrustworthy on every other point.

Vestments and pew cushions are inventions of men, and have no bearing on the veracity of the Scriptures. Quibbling over them is pointless.

God’s word, on the other hand, is deserving of scrutiny - and will survive it unscathed. Not only that, but the exercise itself increases faith in Him. (Like a witness who endures cross-examination, and his testimony comes through as reliable and trustworthy.)

Consider “doubting” Thomas: He demanded to be able to examine Jesus’ wounds. And when HE was convinced, that gives even greater weight to the eye-witness testimony preserved for us.


44 posted on 05/16/2014 8:53:19 AM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: 2nd Amendment

Why is Ken Ham propping up his business partner Bill Nye?


45 posted on 05/16/2014 9:10:46 AM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: okkev68

Nice post, but...

“Only that man has been here partaking in God’s creation for 6000 years.”

I don’t think it says that either.

If this were of importance it would be spelled out quite clearly and unequivocally.


46 posted on 05/16/2014 9:15:21 AM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

How long was a day to God in his time frame? Maybe a billion years?

So why can’t Ken Ham believe the earth is 6 billion years old?


47 posted on 05/16/2014 9:16:45 AM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LearsFool
1. In theory you get a person to agree on the 6,000 year old earth without getting them to Jesus.

2. Not believing in the literal creation story won't keep a believer out of the Kingdom.

3. A person can be brought to saving faith in Jesus without believing the creation story is 7 literal days. Seen it happen.

48 posted on 05/16/2014 10:01:13 AM PDT by Gamecock (#BringTheAdultsBackToDC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Is God’s account of creation of no use then?

(I know you believe otherwise. I just want you to consider why God put it in the Scriptures, and why it’s important for us to believe Him.)


49 posted on 05/16/2014 10:22:50 AM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: stormhill

I have long thought that God called it done when His Word was upon the earth in Mans mind. A falling tree etc...

But as the Author of Time the flow of it is subject to his Hand. It does what He tells it to do. Our view of it is foreshortened by our perspective.

The time in a digital sound file is a function of the clock used...44.1k, 88k, 1,000,000k...The sound recorded, however, isn’t any longer or shorter.

The only relevance any of this has is Faith.


50 posted on 05/16/2014 12:09:59 PM PDT by TalBlack (Evil doesn't have a day job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom
Like most creationism evangelists, Ken Ham preys on the gullible for the money. Between his website (and on-line store) and his “museum”, I’m sure that he is living quite comfortably. I have to agree with Pat Robertson here: young earth creationism makes Christians look really bad. God actually did *not* lie to us by filling the physical universe with evidence of great age and planting evidence that life not only evolved in the past but continues to evolve. Since God is not a liar, it is clear: the Bible is a moral code, not a scientific document.

Questions a Christian must consider in this issue: 1) Is God capable of creating the earth and all we know in any amount of time He desires? Six nanoseconds, six minutes, six days, etc

2) If God is not capable of doing the events noted in Genesis 1, then He is not capable of doing anything else in the Bible. This would also require the nullification of Cross. 3) The last part is the real goal of people who deny God the ability to create ex nihilo.

51 posted on 05/16/2014 1:06:14 PM PDT by ealgeone (obama, borderof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
Well....except for his belief that he continues to peddle the notion that “on the first day” etc. actually refers to a single day, when quite clearly the Bible later explains that to God a day is as a thousand years and a thousand years is as a day.

This is one of the worst distortions of the Bible there is and is a bad case of reading something into the Bible which is not supported by the text.

In Genesis 1 where day is preceded by an ordinal number it means a 24 hour day as we understand it.

52 posted on 05/16/2014 1:08:41 PM PDT by ealgeone (obama, borderof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: okkev68
That is precisely the point and why I get irritated with the 6K earthers. I am strong believer in Christ and the Bible and still believe the Earth is millions of our years old. Nowhere in the Bible does it say the earth is only 6000 years old. Only that man has been here partaking in God’s creation for 6000 years. At the “end of the day” it doesn’t really matter, though. Are you a new creation in Christ or not? If not, you have bigger problems than how old the Earth is.

If you can't believe Genesis 1 as a literal event or that the earth is a young earth then:

Does it matter how many days involving the crucifixtion? Did Christ really rise on the third day?

Did Jesus really heal the blind man or cure the man with leprosy?

If the genealogies we have in the OT are correct, then the Bible does indicate a young earth.

53 posted on 05/16/2014 1:15:30 PM PDT by ealgeone (obama, borderof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: LearsFool
On the contrary. If God’s word is untrue regarding the creation, it is untrustworthy on every other point.

EXCELLENT POINT!

54 posted on 05/16/2014 1:16:52 PM PDT by ealgeone (obama, borderof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: redhawk.44mag

What’s a “dragon”?

When were “dinosaurs” first called that?


55 posted on 05/16/2014 1:18:36 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
1. In theory you get a person to agree on the 6,000 year old earth without getting them to Jesus. 2. Not believing in the literal creation story won't keep a believer out of the Kingdom. 3. A person can be brought to saving faith in Jesus without believing the creation story is 7 literal days. Seen it happen.

Then how can that person believe in a literal resurrection?

56 posted on 05/16/2014 1:18:45 PM PDT by ealgeone (obama, borderof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Zuriel

The atheist creation story:

“In the beginning, there was nothing, and it exploded”


57 posted on 05/16/2014 1:19:39 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: redhawk.44mag
So essentially, there is no proof that anyone’s sins have been forgiven?

Other than the written Word of God??

58 posted on 05/16/2014 1:21:29 PM PDT by ealgeone (obama, borderof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
I have to agree with Pat Robertson here: young earth creationism makes Christians look really bad. God actually did *not* lie to us by filling the physical universe with evidence of great age and planting evidence that life not only evolved in the past but continues to evolve. Since God is not a liar, it is clear: the Bible is a moral code, not a scientific document. I agree with Robertson as to the earth being more than 6000 years old...and the bible actually allows for it! Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Gen 1:2 The earth was without form, and void; and darkness was on the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters. In verse 2 the words "without form" and void" are a a couple of hebrew words tohu and bohu. The grammar leaves open that it could be translated "The earth became without form and void". In other words, there was a earth that existed prior to this and something caused it become desolate. There's similar wording in Jeremiah: Jer 4:23 I beheld the earth, and indeed it was without form, and void; And the heavens, they had no light. The same words tohu and bohu are used and this is describing the state of the world in a warning to Israel if they don't repent. Also there are events described in the bible that must take place before man was created....such as the fall of Satan and the other third of the angels. Since Satan was in the garden before Adam and Eve sinned he must have fallen at some point before then.

this is the Gap Theory and it is not supported from a Biblical perspective.

59 posted on 05/16/2014 1:22:41 PM PDT by ealgeone (obama, borderof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

Are you aware of the evidences for a young creation?
Or have you just been exposed to information to the contrary as I was for 30+ years?


60 posted on 05/16/2014 1:24:39 PM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-253 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson