“A common misconception in Christian theology is that the church replaces Israel”
I have never heard that line of preaching in a main stream Christian church
Oh yes, that’s definitely there. It’s said that because of disobedience Israel has forfeited the promises of God and that it’s now the “church” who is the new spiritual Israel and it has inherited the promises of God to Israel, because it’s the new spiritual Israel.
That was established in Catholic doctrine from way back in maybe around 300 or 400 AD and carried over in the Protestant Reformation, by default. It has produced “institutionalize anti-semitism” in the segment of the church that holds to this.
It’s also called supersessionism, too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supersessionism
You might also note that the majority of the Christian church, worldwide, holds to this ... and they are absolutely wrong!
A common misconception in Christian theology is that the church replaces IsraelI have never heard that line of preaching in a main stream Christian church
It's a common caricature.
For a recent (and ignored) thread on this: The Church and Israel in the New Testament.
Here’s one of the mainstream churches and an example of how “Replacement Theology” works out in everyday practice!
Presbyterian Leader to Jews: Abandon Israel For America
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3169054/posts
In a posting on Facebook, Reverend Grimm addressed the Jewish people by writing, America is the Promised Land. We all know this. Come to the land of opportunity. Quit feeling guilt about what you are doing in Palestine, Jewish friends. Stop it. Come home to America!
While many Presbyterian divestment supporters have claimed that they are not against Israels existence, only its occupation of Palestinian territory, this latest incident appears to prove otherwise. In fact, many within the Presbyterian Church have begun to express alarm at the anti-Israel stance of much of their leadership. One group of prominent Presbyterian leaders recently noted that Zionism Unsettled, the pamphlet produced by Church members to make the case for divestment, had been endorsed by notorious white supremacist David Duke, who praised its utilization of racist terminology he originally popularized.