Change the definition of marriage and then complain about “equity”. Since when do homos have the power to redefine words?
Sally is being intentionally dense. They were targeted because of the information on their website.
***“women respond to love positively because they were created that way” and “men respond to respect because that is the way they are created.”***
I’ll buy that.
And the private “chapel” reportedly gives its newlyweds a conservative Christian CD with hetero-reinforcing marriage sermons.
and? I’m guessing Kohn wants the govt to stop this as well.
I don’t care if queers marry steers, but not at my house, and it is discrimination based upon my beliefs and cultural intelligence. Discrimination for the sake of truth is a virtue.
King Henry VIII created the Church of England, an “establishment of religion” to force conformity to his liberal view of sex and marriage. Henry VIII wanted easy divorce and remarriage so he could father a male child .....
this led to decades of strife in the UK with dissenters coming to our shores and giving us a Constitution with a First Amendment guaranteeing freedom of religion.
Now there is a movement trying to force its liberal view of sex and marriage on religion just like old Henry VIII did......OMG.......
Especially look for the selfie of this iron jawed bull dyke munching on a tea bag. Symbolism?
Not that it would do anything to change her point of view but she gets a hammering in the comments.
Religious Freedom = Discrimination
No difference. We have a God-give right to discriminate becasue we have the God-given freedom to choose.
Blow the lid off of this “anti-discrimination” b.s. which has been a stealth way for the government to try to take away your freedoms of choice and exercise of religion.
I’ve looked her up. Never again...never again (shudder)
There, no one was refuse anything, just ignored, like you are, a fart.
And the tyrants keep speaking, and babbling their deluded B.S. including Ms. Kohn.
None of the businesses that have been attacked are government-owned; as such, they are not required to treat everyone with the neutrality that is constitutionally required of the government.
As far as I can see there are no law saying I can not discriminate against some one.
The states are not allowed to discriminate but see if they uphold your right to give your 17 year old son a beer when the bartender says no.
Take a dog into the wedding chapel and when they say no call the cops and see if they will force them to marry you to your dog which is almost as bad as a man getting married to another man.
I agree, leave Jesus out of it because you may show your ignorance.
Any one who knows the Bible a little and is half bright may have to admit that it was Christ who spoke the word that destroyed the queer cities with fire.
Yes, Jesus spoke a great deal about love and compassion and so did John but too many people including some clergymen are too stupid to understand what they were saying.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, ****OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF****
-US Constitution, 1st Amendment
What a twisted bunch of nonsense.
How does making a profit instantly neutralize religious freedom?
This is worth having a shooting war over.
This is because the sacrament of Marriage has been lost and not defended.
If you’re a laundromat and you don’t offer dish washing services, you don’t violate the civil rights of those with dirty dishes.
Say: “Our church only offers the sacrament of Marriage. See the Holy Bible for a definition.”