Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First Priest to Marry Same-Sex Partner Sues Church for Discrimination [UK]
The Guardian ^ | 6/15/15 | Ben Quinn

Posted on 06/17/2015 6:27:50 AM PDT by marshmallow

Canon Jeremy Pemberton argues at Nottingham employment tribunal that Church of England unlawfully revoked his permission to officiate

The first priest to marry his same-sex partner has begun a discrimination case against the Church of England over its withdrawal of his right to officiate as a priest following the union.

Canon Jeremy Pemberton, who married Laurence Cunnington in April 2014, had been informed that Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS trust was withdrawing an offer of a job after Bishop Richard Inwood refused him the official licence in the diocese of Southwell and Nottingham.

The clergyman, who argues that Inwood unlawfully discriminated against him, told the first day of hearings at Nottingham employment tribunal how he felt after his permission to officiate (PTO) was revoked.

“PTOs are (only) really revoked if someone has done something serious, they’re criminally involved, is involved in an affair or has lost their capacity,” said Pemberton, the Lincolnshire Echo reported.

A spokesman for the Church of England said the church has no truck with homophobia and supports clergy who are in civil partnerships.

He added: “The Church of England’s doctrine on marriage is clear. The church quite reasonably expects its clergy to honour their commitment to model and live up to the teachings of the church. Clergy do not have the option of treating the teachings of the church as an à la carte menu and only modelling those with which they personally agree.

(Excerpt) Read more at theguardian.com ...


TOPICS: Current Events; Mainline Protestant; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: churchofengland; samesexmarriage; thereisnoenglandnow; waronreligion

1 posted on 06/17/2015 6:27:50 AM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Matthew 7:16 You will recognize them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? 17 So, every healthy tree bears good fruit, but the diseased tree bears bad fruit. 18 A healthy tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a diseased tree bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Thus you will recognize them by their fruits. (ESV)


2 posted on 06/17/2015 6:38:51 AM PDT by Gamecock (Why do bad things happen to good people? That only happened once, and He volunteered. R.C. Sproul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

These people are delusional, and they want to force the rest of us to go along with them in their delusions.

I, for one, will not. I will rather point out that they are mentally ill, delusional, perhaps even psychotic, giving their propensity for using the threat of force to make others agree with their lunacy.


3 posted on 06/17/2015 6:44:37 AM PDT by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

In a sane world, these pervs would be laughed out of court.


4 posted on 06/17/2015 7:04:59 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

This first priest to pretend to “marry” his same-sex partner is in open rebellion against God’s laws. He is not acting as a priest of that church, and the church is morally required to discriminate on that basis. It’s like a Ford salesman who tells every customer how glad he is not to own an expensive, smelly, polluting hunk of rusting metal - of course the car dealership would fire him.


5 posted on 06/17/2015 7:05:11 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Clergy do not have the option of treating the teachings of the church as an à la carte menu and only modelling those with which they personally agree.

What an archaic concept! Here I thought they had the right to force what was clearly fashionable and trendy on the rest of the church. < / sarcasm >

6 posted on 06/17/2015 7:12:38 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Is there a clinical definition for ‘homophobia’?


7 posted on 06/17/2015 7:13:32 AM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Satan is very popular in the non-Church of England as well as their American counterpart, the Episcopal non-church.


8 posted on 06/17/2015 7:31:35 AM PDT by Dr. Thorne (The night is far spent, the day is at hand.- Romans 13:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

> “You will recognize them by their fruits.”

I wonder what Matthew would think today if he got to see the double meaning in that verse...: )


9 posted on 06/17/2015 8:05:23 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson