| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 12/23/2015 6:58:49 PM PST by Religion Moderator, reason:
Thread has degenerated into personal battles. |
Posted on 12/20/2015 10:29:03 AM PST by ebb tide
When Pope Francis was elected, I was entirely positive about the new pontificate, focusing in my commentary on the new Pope’s apparent devotion to the Blessed Virgin and his respect for the Fatima event, as shown by his request to the Patriarch of Portugal to consecrate his entire pontificate to Our Lady of Fatima. But I confess that at the time I knew next to nothing about the former Cardinal Mario Bergoglio. I did not know, for example, that he was “famous for his inconsistency.â€
After two-and-a-half years of experience with this pontificate, however, I was not the least surprised to learn that Francis had named the fulminating, anti-Fatima, anti-Marian heretic Enzo Bianchi as a consultor to the Pontifical Council for the Promotion of Christian Unity. This phony “monk,†a layman who calls himself “Prior†of the phony interdenominational “monastery†of the “Bose Community,†was rightly denounced by Monsignor Antonio Livi, former dean of the faculty of philosophy at the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross in Rome, as “substantially atheist†and a “prophet of the end of Catholicism†whose speeches are “a rhetorical device for his propaganda in favour of a humanism that is nominally Christian but substantially atheist.â€
The heretic Francis has appointed to a pontifical council detests Marian devotion and despises the Message of Fatima. Mary, says the phony monk, “can not be the reference point for the advancement of women in the Church.†As for Fatima, Bianchi pronounces Our Lady’s apparitions there a “swindle.†Why? Because according to him, any God “who talks about the persecuted Christians, but forgets the six million Jews annihilated in Germany is not a credible God.â€
So, Francis has elevated to Vatican prominence a layman in a monk’s costume who dares to declare what God would had to have included in the Fatima prophecies in order to maintain the divine credibility. But as Vito Messori has observed: “Bianchi should remember that Communism (Lenin seized power in 1917) has at least 100 million deaths on its conscience, and there would not have been Hitler, if there had not previously been Lenin.†In fact, Nazism — that is, National Socialism — is precisely the outcome of the spread of the “errors of Russia†that Our Lady predicted, it having arisen in pre-World War II Germany as a rival to Marxism-Leninism. And during WWII the Hitler-Stalin Pact, pledging mutual non-aggression, ended only when Hitler invaded Poland.
For Bianchi, notes Msgr. Nicola Bux, a Consultor to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “the deconstruction of the papacy in its present form is an especially important concern…†That being so, Bianchi’s appointment to a pontifical council is entirely in keeping with the ongoing deconstruction of the Church by its diabolically disorientated leadership, which seems intent (if it were possible) on committing ecclesial suicide.
Put the rise of this enemy of Our Lady of Fatima — by the Pope’s own hand — into the file marked “Third Secret.â€
Response: True.
A fake??
Who knew?
< /sarc>
Were you there?
There are some things that are false on their face; i.e. crying and/or bleeding statutes, crosses in toilet windows, images of Mary in scrambled eggs, UFO’s, Bigfoot, etc. There is no need to be there, one simply uses common sense.
Wait a moment. How exactly do these things prove or even relate to the claims of Fatima?
Why, one might adapt your reasoning to deny that Jesus did a single miracle or rose from the dead. After all, the only "proof" we have of these is the testimony of witnesses and the historical record of fulfilled prophecy -- exactly has Fatima has.
Called “Mass Hysteria” among people predisposed to believe in the Magna Mater, Cybele, or the Goddess. The Lord’s Messengers are angels(By definition.) not the “Goddess.” Another reason for rejection.
Jesus is the Lord given all by the father. Mary was simply a nice lady, probably made it into heaven, and has no other function in the Divine Scheme beyond being the mother of our Lord. Her adaptation as a Goddess is simply a conversion from paganism of the Great Mother with a thin veneer of Christian words.
I get it. This is anti-Catholic harassment plain and simple. You cans safely ignore this, ebb.
Were you?
I'm sorry, FRiend. You have effective disqualified this as a possibility in your post #5. It cannot be had both ways. If you cannot prove that Mary is not today Queen of Heaven and Earth, men and angels, then you cannot prove that Jesus is or was ever anything and therefore your hope of salvation and the answering of any of your prayers is in vain.
They are all claimed miracles. The same claims were made in pagan times; weeping statues, appearances by Gods and Goddesses before thousands.
I don't think he was addressing you. I wasn't there.
But we both know someone who was.
Harassment, my foot.
You persist in proving my point.
I understand. It's only harasment when it happens on your thread. Or perhaps the very existence of this thread constitutes harassment in the stilted, fundamentalist "mind".
There is no “Queen of Heaven” “I am the way, the truth and the life, and no man comes unto the father except by me.” -Jesus of Nazareth That is absolute proof.
We are able to respond to any post.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.