Go Lithuanian. You'll never go back.
Posted on 01/18/2016 11:12:49 AM PST by Repent and Believe
I mentioned the intentional covering of Bergoglio's pectoral cross in the heretical and hateful-to-God video put out by FrancisChurch last week. Just so you know that I'm not fantasizing about this stuff, check this out:
Caption: (Photo not included ... see link)
"See? I tucked it in so you wouldn't be offended by the sight of any of that superstitous bullshit. Pretty damn humble of me, eh? So, are you a Traveling Man too?"
Guys, I keep trying to tell you, THEY DON'T ACTUALLY BELIEVE ANY OF IT. Bergoglio is HIDING THE CROSS OF CHRIST for fear of "offending" this Jewish man with the Truth and Love of God. Bergoglio would sooner die than tell this Jewish man about Jesus Christ, the Messiah, The Way, The Truth and The Life, and His Holy Church, which is the New Temple and the True Israel.
And some of them, like Bergoglio I strongly suspect, are diabolical narcissists who have devalued God (as Lucifer did) and are now at war with Him (as Lucifer is). The battlefield in all of this, my dear readers, is EVERY HUMAN SOUL. Including yours. And Jorge Bergoglio is ON THE WRONG SIDE, and is SQUATTING LIKE A TOAD UPON THE SEE OF PETER.
To all of the people who keep saying that Francis is no big deal, and this too shall pass, I find your cavalier attitude toward the eternal souls of your fellow man who are being scandalized, driven away, and/or confirmed and ratified in MORTAL SIN by this man, human beings, a non-trivial number of which die every day, simply disgusting.
Yes, this too shall pass, but at what cost? HOW. MANY. SOULS?
Satan and the demons are PROACTIVELY ENGAGED and interested in every human being. They are intensely interested in each individual person, and realize the enormity of the loss of each individual person, given that The Second Person of the Godhead incarnated, suffered and died so that each INDIVIDUAL person would be redeemed, and perhaps saved.
Satan and the demons understand that, and more importantly, believe it. Too bad we don't.
So for today you must reject the con man we see in Ann Barnhardt's photo.
I know that is painful, but if you start to feel that pain it is a sign that you may find the right road, which is to attend Mass where it is as it was in the day of a certainly authentic pontiff, as in Pope Pius XII.
I’ve been pondering lately whether I should be looking more at Orthodoxy.
orthodoxy as in the Greek Orthodox church?....or the Ukranian Orthodox church?......I could fit into either of those...
Thank you for posting the full text.
We take a train to attend a Tridentine Latin Mass. I would suggest it for any Catholic in these trying times. It’s a beautiful Mass, so very respectful.
Um, Ann? The loss of souls have been multiplying since Vatican II. You're just starting to see the personification of Vatican II in Bergoglio.
Maybe in fact Francis is a Russian plant to drive people to Orthodoxy. Ah Ha! I knew Putin was behind this!
He’s ashamed because he found out that Yashua was Jewish.
Pope Franciss hiding of the pectoral cross brings Romans 1:16 to mind.
In fact, not only does the above verse reference the salvation of the Jews, but regarding the Chair of Peter, Galations 2:7-9 shows that preaching the gospel to the Jews was regarded as Gods will for Peter.
You suggest Catholics take trains to Mass? What if there are no trains where I live? (we do have an occasional Latin Mass, however).
It was just a suggestion for those who do. We’ve got a number of TLMs around us, but none we can get to by bike, and we no longer have a car. So it’s a train for us.
We take a train to attend a Tridentine Latin Mass
***********************
That sounds like a great idea. You are to be lauded for the sacrifice to get there.
The point is to attend a Mass that is approved by valid popes. The Novus Ordo is not a valid Mass, as it brings about a loss of faith.
I was just teasing :). Was about to suggest to our bishop he investigate light rail to every parish.
“The Novus Ordo is not a valid Mass, as it brings about a loss of faith.”
It doesn’t exactly endanger my faith (which endures regardless of what the parish, diocese or Vatican does) but tends to elicit very negative emotions toward the Church, so I avoid it. But most Catholics don’t react that way, including my 98 YO mother and kids, and none of this is relevant to the validity anyway.
“...I’d make a bigger deal about other things he’s actually said (assuming they weren’t due to the many mistranslations)...”
***************************
You haven’t been paying attention to what he has been saying or doing. See
http://thewildvoice.org/pope-francis-chronology-perspective/
“The Novus Ordo is not a valid Mass, as it brings about a loss of faith.”
________________
“It doesn’t exactly endanger my faith...”
***************************
IT IS A DANGER. Please see “Problems with the New Mass & Vatican II” at the following link:
http://www.willingshepherds.net/Problems%20witht%20the%20New%20Mass.html
I wandered for a long time. Husband was raised in the
Baptist church; all his folks were Baptists, his brother
& SIL are Catholics (I’m not particularly impressed by
their brand of “religion”). He refused church altogether
for many years; but now that he’s old it’s different. -
I was in the Greek Orthodox Church for a while, but went
through a terrible time when my mother passed away & that
didn’t work for me after that - lived too far away from
the church, customs were too foreign, husband was too
hostile about it. I don’t like the Baptist preoccupation
with ALCOHOL being EVIL & I think there’s a lot wrong with
the Baptist theology. I do think I *could* tolerate going
in to the local Catholic church, sans my husband; but I do
not like all that “Vatican” stuff. I’m at a loss right now
on what to do. I do not feel at peace with the casual,
every now and then approach to taking the sacrament in the
Baptist church. - Any thoughts or suggestions anyone?
Missouri Synod Lutheran ,perhaps.
I found Lutheran more Scripture oriented and without all the statuary and saint-themed momentos. Sadly, about half of Lutheran churches now embrace homosexual choices and other destructive ideas. It is recorded that Luther did not want the church called after him,but to be known as the Evangelical Church.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.