Evangelicals and Trump: Why as an Evangelical, I Support President Trump Despite His Flaws

It WAS a sanctimonious, and all too fluffy article, with little to say, without moral authority.

I documented why in the earlier post. You never addressed what I said, rather excused your inability to see it.

Therefore you were right.

And yes, that last phrase needs an /s for those that cannot see straight.

I will say this one more time for you. There is NO reason for an evangelical to not be thoroughly proud of what Trump has done on his watch. There is NO reason to be anything other than proud of our vote for him. To prevaricate as this author did is to be double-minded. To be mealy mouthed about it is to fall for the evil Alinsky tactics of the left.

Go ahead, keep defending this nonsense.

RE: It WAS a sanctimonious, and all too fluffy article, with little to say, without moral authority.

You can repeat that a thousand times, but you have not in any way, shown where the sanctimony is. If any, his column IS A RESPONSE to the sanctimony of those Evangelicals who say they cannot support Trump because of his moral flaws.

RE: I documented why in the earlier post. You never addressed what I said, rather excused your inability to see it.

OK, could you kindly repeat your point so that I can address it.

RE: There is NO reason for an evangelical to not be thoroughly proud of what Trump has done on his watch. T

I don’t know why you have to repeat this. Michael Brown’s article IS a defense of Trump’s policies, while at the same time not excusing his past moral failings.

You are in effect, agreeing with him.

RE: m. To prevaricate as this author did is to be double-minded. To be mealy mouthed about it is to fall for the evil Alinsky tactics of the left.

To be silent in the face of attacks on Trump IS a capitulation to Alinsky tactics. Alinsky’s tactic is to repeat charges and repeat them again hoping that a lie, repeated often becomes the truth. Articles like this are in fact NOT NONSENSE. They are necessary responses to Alinskyite tactics.

Wow. You actually admit you didn't read, nor pay attention to what I said. You certainly never took debate classes, or you would actually try to understand what I was saying.

Instead, you do the age old leftist trick of disregarding what was said, and then shifting to ground you prefer to score points you believe important.

Well done.

Perhaps you're as naive as the author, thinking we don't notice what you're doing.

You have written so many things that I cannot make head or tail of your point.

In one case,I don’t even see why you are critical of the author when in fact, you agree with him.

But let’s get back to your accusation against this author -— SANCTIMONY.

SHOW ME WHERE THE AUTHOR OF THIS ARTICLE WAS SANCTIMONIOUS... I’M WAITING...

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.