Skip to comments.
Texas Bars All Clergy From Execution Chambers Following Supreme Court Decision
Aleteia ^
| 4/4/19
| Zelda Caldwell
Posted on 04/05/2019 5:12:29 PM PDT by marshmallow
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
To: Jamestown1630
I read a book many years ago, written by a physician who had to oversee executions at Sing Sing in the early-to-mid-20th Century. Ive never been able to find that book again, but the doctor made a very good case for his opinion that the death penalty was NOT a deterrent. I disagree. There has yet to be one case where an executed criminal kills again. Trust me, it's a deterrent. It works 100% its carried out.
41
posted on
04/05/2019 8:39:55 PM PDT
by
Bommer
(Help 2ndDivisionVet - https://www.gofundme.com/mvc.php?route=category&term=married-recent-amputecan')
To: House Atreides
Well, my thought was that we should not take our notions of ‘punishment’ to the point where we don’t have ultimate moral authority.
Capital Punishment is not self-defense in the sense that defending ourselves against, for instance, a war of aggression is.
Capital punishment is a very long-considered, cold-blooded decision to kill an *individual* because we feel we’ve been offended by his actions.
As practiced, and from all arguments that I’ve seen here, it simply comes down to revenge. And if you think about it long and hard - getting your ego out of it - it’s macabre, creepy, and not a credit to us as human beings who CLAIM to believe in ideals that exist and rule above this nasty material realm.
I personally feel that we need to rise above the idea of revenge, and become smarter and more effective in the ways that we deal with these things.
42
posted on
04/05/2019 8:44:37 PM PDT
by
Jamestown1630
("A Republic, if you can keep it")
To: Bommer
It may stop the one person we killed from killing again.
But killing, since Cain and Abel, has always gone on, regardless of laws and penalties. The ‘death penalty’, where it still exists, doesn’t deter killing.
It would be interesting to see the murder statistics in areas where there is a death penalty, as compared with areas where there is not a death penalty. I suspect that they are at least relatively equal.
43
posted on
04/05/2019 8:53:33 PM PDT
by
Jamestown1630
("A Republic, if you can keep it")
To: Quickgun
They are trusting their lives to a jury, and a judge seeing to it that things are done well, and automatic appeals, and a governor.
There are a lot of fail safes.
44
posted on
04/05/2019 9:00:05 PM PDT
by
Persevero
(Desmond is not -Amazing- Desmond is -Abused-)
To: Jamestown1630
Lock up for life is not justice.
We need justice.
45
posted on
04/05/2019 9:01:00 PM PDT
by
Persevero
(Desmond is not -Amazing- Desmond is -Abused-)
To: Jamestown1630
Lock up for life is not justice.
We need justice.
46
posted on
04/05/2019 9:01:12 PM PDT
by
Persevero
(Desmond is not -Amazing- Desmond is -Abused-)
To: Persevero
The ‘failsafe’ that is missing is - in my opinion - the one that assures us that we, as mere human beings, ultimately have the moral RIGHT to do this.
47
posted on
04/05/2019 9:04:07 PM PDT
by
Jamestown1630
("A Republic, if you can keep it")
To: Persevero
I assume that you have a personal definition of the word ‘justice’ (?)
48
posted on
04/05/2019 9:05:38 PM PDT
by
Jamestown1630
("A Republic, if you can keep it")
To: Jamestown1630
You must have a real problem with war then.
To: missthethunder
I think I addressed that in post 42.
The two situations represent different circumstances, requiring different considerations which, in turn, lead to different conclusions.
50
posted on
04/05/2019 9:32:16 PM PDT
by
Jamestown1630
("A Republic, if you can keep it")
To: Jamestown1630
I have a biblical view of the word justice.
I am not sure what sort of view you might have as to the concept.
51
posted on
04/05/2019 11:10:11 PM PDT
by
Persevero
(Desmond is not -Amazing- Desmond is -Abused-)
To: Fiddlstix
Missed the point - this move keeps other’s from stopping their executions on a technicality that the State doesn’t employ ...a Wiccan, perhaps....
52
posted on
04/06/2019 4:19:39 AM PDT
by
trebb
(Don't howl about illegal leeches while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
To: Vermont Lt
I’m not going to see a “god” when I die, I will stand in front of God and be happy to do it.
To: marshmallow
The Holy Spirit knows no physical boundary, so, there’s no need for a medium to be physically present in the killing chamber.
Also, there’s no need for anyone to be killed by the state, in this day and time in this technologically advanced nation. This is not to say they don’t deserve death, of course.
54
posted on
04/06/2019 8:49:33 AM PDT
by
jacknhoo
(Luke 12:51; Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
To: Jamestown1630
Capital Punishment is not self-defense in the sense that defending ourselves against, for instance, a war of aggression is.Actually it is. We have been so secure as a nation since WWII, that we have been able to relax those standards, but now the cost of that relaxation is coming back to haunt and threaten our Constitution.
55
posted on
04/06/2019 9:00:20 AM PDT
by
Cvengr
( Adversity in life & death is inevitable; Stress is optional through faith in Christ.)
To: Midwesterner53
It “highlights” to them? Like Jesus wouldn’t have noticed except that there was a Buddhist in the fry-chamber right at the end?
To: Midwesterner53
Who cares if he wanted a Buddist preacher in the chamber. That just highlights to God and Jesus that he worshiped false idols and gods, not a good send off for anyone wanting Heaven.
And you assume that God/Jesus is the real thing. The exact same way he assumes there are no real gods. It would be just as logical to ask why you would want a priest at your deathbed?
To: Jamestown1630
It would be interesting to see the murder statistics in areas where there is a death penalty, as compared with areas where there is not a death penalty. I suspect that they are at least relatively equal.
Statistically, that would be an impossibility. For two equal societies, if one kills murderers and the other doesn't, you can completely ignore the deterrent factor. Simply by permanently removing a murderer from the population prevents him from murdering again. Thereby meaning fewer people are murdered in that society.
To: Jamestown1630
The two situations represent different circumstances, requiring different considerations which, in turn, lead to different conclusions.
Not really. War is simply a larger act of murder. It's just on a societal basis as opposed to an individual basis.
To: Svartalfiar
I don’t assume anything on God and Jesus. I know.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson