Skip to comments.Pro-Abortion Candidate Elizabeth Warren Sings "Jesus Loves the Little Children" At Event
Posted on 10/11/2019 11:17:11 PM PDT by Its All Over Except ...
The front-running Democratic Presidential candidate who is pro-abortion up until the first breath sang a rendition of "Jesus Loves the Little Children" at CNN's LGBTQ Town Hall in Los Angeles on Thursday. Elizabeth Warren sang the song in defense of gay marriage.
She did not apply the song or its lyrics to unborn children who are slaughtered relentlessly by Democrat-protected abortuaries and whose blood money fuels her campaign.
The church I grew up in, the first song I remember singing, "Red and yellow, black and white, they are precious in his sight. Jesus Loves the little children of the world."
Warren continued "This truth is about the preciousness of each and any life. It is about the worth of every human being."
(Excerpt) Read more at pulpitandpen.org ...
Not one scripture supports any other position. No liberal has ever found a scripture that justifies homosexuality. Go against the truth that the Bible never condones homosexuality and you go against Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
And not one scripture supports any position that children in some instances aren't a "heritage of the Lord" and that they need to be aborted intentionally by the mother.
Liberals like Warren will quote Jesus when it suits them, but in totality, as Jesus said, their lips praise Him, but their hearts are far from Him.
It is no coincidence that Buttigieg has been talking about scripture twisting it, that O’rourke wants to tax churches that aren’t for homosexual marriage, and that Warren is using Jesus instead of seeking to obey Him.
Dems this year are really into playing games with God.
If Warren thinks men should stay true to one woman in marriage, which is true, then how do we get to where women aren’t 4 times as likely to divorce a man as men are to divorce a woman?
And how do we deal with the scientific studies that show homosexuals, even in marriage, are exponentially more likely to cheat that heterosexuals are?
I thought it was politically incorrect to sing that song because it says:
Red, yellow, black and white, they are precious in His sight. Jesus loves the little children of the world
And its not good to say red or yellow, etc.,.
Liberals make things up as they go along.
And they expect others to give them ‘passes’ when they dont even adhere to their own ever changing standards, but they won’t do the same in return.
You won’t believe this...
Even those still in the womb.
[ The front-running Democratic Presidential candidate who is pro-abortion up until the first breath sang a rendition of “Jesus Loves the Little Children” at CNN’s LGBTQ Town Hall in Los Angeles on Thursday. Elizabeth Warren sang the song in defense of gay marriage. ]
Dear God in Heaven, this woman’s mind is completely reprobate.
Not that any of us are surprised. Spirit of antichrist on public display.
Sorry for the double-pings to a few. This is so unbelievable that it boggles the mind.
If it were up to skanks like Warren, there wouldnt be any little children left alive for Jesus to love.
Democrats have been using this strategy since 2005 under the guise of closing what they call The God Gap.
They say Socialized Medicine is charity and Christian. There is no charity in forced taxation. And we cannot be forced to tithe to Democrats religion.
Warren is a whore of Babylon pimping small boys to pederasts promoting crossdressing for 9 year olds.
Thank you for your clear testimony.
These attitudes are what I believe was meant by “thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain.”
Yet many Christians seem to be more concerned about the imprecation “goddamn” and similar vulgarities. I believe these are trivial compared with claiming divine sanction for evil acts.
And as my sainted Dad would say: “When the hammer hits the thumb, you’re not going to say ‘Oh goodness gracious me!’”
Just like pelousy praying for the president
Was she trying to suggest Our Saviour was a pedophile?
I like your posts when it comes to religion more so than many that post regarding the Bible etc.
You do it in a straightforward manner that is Not condescending or pompous or implies a religiously moral superiority on your part.
You just make STRONG points that are worth paying attention to and you refer to the Bible in a way that is easy to understand for those of us who are just not as well read on it.
Of course we should be, but some of us can just get through about 2 paragraphs before our minds fly in 10 different directions.
So folks like you are where we learn a lot about the Bible and it’s great.
I must do more reading on my own, even if it’s in limited quantity at a time.
Thanks for your posts.
You know we Italians ALL KNOW EACH OTHER and I talked to Rudy and you’re in a LOT of trouble.
Nah, I don’t have his new number.
Hope you are well and always enjoy your posts even when our opinions diverge occasionally.
Using the Lord’s Name in vain is not a “trivual” sin and is another example of twisting the truth of God’s Word. God will not be mocked. He is Holy.
Jesus does indeed love the little children. He also hates people that hurt them. He hates them so much that it would be better if they had a millstone wrapped around their neck and thrown into the sea. So the alternative must be pretty bad.
You evidently don’t understand what I wrote. You seem to have an overly censorious attitude toward human frailty.
A burst of bad language isn’t exactly admirable but under certain circumstances I can understand it. I can’t speak for the Lord, but as a matter of common sense I can’t imagine that a merciful God would consign someone to hell for swearing when the hammer hits the thumb.
No “truth of God’s Word” is being twisted in such instances.
It’s simply a release of steam when confronting physical or emotional pain.
To me, real blasphemy starts with making promises in the Lord’s name — for example, the oaths taken by witnesses — and then breaking them. And invoking the Lord’s name to sanction evil practices — homosexuality above all — is blasphemy of the foulest sort. Mayor Buttigieg seems to be a particularly bad offender.
I hope you can see the distinctions I’m trying to make.
Something is clearly wrong with her. It may be internal contradictions are playing havoc with her. If so, then there is hope for her but I seriously doubt it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.