Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Coming Tribulation Altar; Satan's Number One Target!
IFB ^ | 11/12/21

Posted on 11/12/2021 4:04:53 AM PST by The Ignorant Fisherman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: Bookshelf

There seems to be three parts of Christianity in this age.

Mathew, Mark, Luke

The era of Mathew is represented by the first disciples, and the time the Light,or Zerah, was here on earth.

The era of Mark is represented by the Peres, or the breach, from when the Light left to return to heaven.
This time is about 2,000 cubits of time.
Two cock crows.
Represented by the about 2,000 demon possessed swine.
Unclean doctrines of demons in the world, and church, not to be consumed or touched.

The era of Luke is represented by the Zerah, Light, being fully born.
A return of the Light, which left about 2,000 years ago.

This Luke period is overlapped with Mark with the Man carrying a Jar of Water, at Passover.

That sign in the heavens has not reached Passover yet.

Judah’s sons, Er and Onan are representative of these last 2 days of time in the Kingdom on earth, Christianity.
Wicked. And not bringing forth offspring.
Or,Judahs other 2 sons, Zerah and Peres.

Zerah means Light.
Peres means breach.

Recall Zerahs hand came out first, but quickly returned back in. Tied with a red thread, sign of blood sacrifice.
Then his brother, Peres, or Breach from the Light,came forth, fully born..

Then Zerah was fully born.

Light, Breach, Light
Mathew, Mark, Luke
Christ here, Christ in Heaven, Christ Returns

The church doesn’t know what it doesnt know.

It’s not representing the Light.
It’s a Breach between the Light

That’s Satan’s influence on Peter and Judas.
The first disciple named and the last.
That’s Satan’s influence on the Kingdom of heaven on earth..

That’s the shepherd and priesthood staffs of Moses and Aaron becoming serpents.

That’s another aspect to Christianity.
Always was going to become a serpent..

For His purposes
For His Glory

Another aspect.
The disciples in Mathew and Luke were instructed not to take a staff.

Only those disciples in Mark were told to take a staff.
The shepherd and priesthood staff.
That became a serpent.

I don’t have the evidence handy, but I suspect the disciples in Mark were also told to wear sandals.

Sandals,or the taking off of a sandal has aspects to bringing forth offspring.

The questions should be, when does Satan get its tail grabbed and Christianity no longer is serpent led?

It’s the first sign that causes an enslaved, unbelieving Israel,to believe.

All scripture is profitable.
For all.
Even, and maybe especially Revelation.

One may find that Satan isn’t waiting to deceive the whole world.
Satan does it today.
With Islam, Judaism and especially, Christianity.


21 posted on 11/12/2021 8:37:15 AM PST by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bookshelf

Wrong. The inspired authors may have written specifically to this group or that group - but in no way are books in the Bible JUST for a specific group. Especially the Gospels, the ENTIRE book of Acts and Revelation.

So with your logic - you’re stating that God was NOT speaking to me as Christ walked the earth and was crucified and rose again? and when the Holy Spirit fell on the upper room and filled the new believers with the Holy Spirit to speak boldly the Gospel and power of Christ? The first 4 chapters is just for Jews? Wrong.

Same logic - Paul was writing specifically to Timothy so I should ‘ignore’ or not use it? Paul himself said to Timothy ‘ALL Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.” (2 Tim 3:16-17)

Doesn’t say ‘... so that ONLY YOU TIMOTHY may be thoroughly equipped...”

Don’t confuse author’s account or immediate target with what God intended as audience of a writing.


22 posted on 11/12/2021 8:44:23 AM PST by time4good
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: time4good

I make the point because John’s Revelation baffled many of the Church’s early leaders. So baffling that it was not thought to be included in a “Bible” until voted on at the Council of Laodicea. I would consider it the last prophetic chapter of the Old Testament. Personally, I consider Paul to be the greatest human who ever lived, and an apostle who brought to us Gentiles a Gospel we could both live with and adore. I have my prejudices, and others can feel free to attack them, but if you read the letters of Peter in the New Testament you will have to agree that Jewish Christianity was an attenuated force. Christianity would have died were it not for Paul, and that is something that Christ foresaw.


23 posted on 11/12/2021 8:51:21 AM PST by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: The Ignorant Fisherman

We need Hal Lindsey to see us through the end of the world. He did a great job in the 70’s when the world ended back then.


24 posted on 11/12/2021 8:55:31 AM PST by Yollopoliuhqui
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bookshelf

And yet Paul and today’s Christianity do not have the same Jesus or the same first/chief importance of the gospel.

The Antichrist Papacy and Pope’s Jesus is not Paul’s Jesus.

Is that a good thing or a bad thing in the end times?


25 posted on 11/12/2021 9:04:40 AM PST by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bookshelf

I get your points, and can respect and/or agree with their finer points - but, just on counterpoint - Christ absolutely knew the value of Paul as a servant but I don’t know if it can be said ‘the greatest human (except for Christ) who ever lived’.


26 posted on 11/12/2021 10:01:13 AM PST by time4good
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: time4good

Who in the living hell ever considered Christ human? He took human form, yes. But Paul was the human, the man he fingered to ensure that the Trinity would never die.


27 posted on 11/12/2021 10:23:50 AM PST by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: delchiante

I’m sorry, but I don’t know what it is that you are trying to express. Please clarify.
t


28 posted on 11/12/2021 10:25:31 AM PST by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

The first recorded use of the Old English word “Church” is from the thirteenth century. More than likely the original translation would have been ‘synagogue’.


29 posted on 11/12/2021 10:28:24 AM PST by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: time4good

You say I’M Wrong. “The inspired authors may have written specifically to this group or that group - but in no way are books in the Bible JUST for a specific group. Especially the Gospels, the ENTIRE book of Acts and Revelation.”
You are wrong, you can go through the first four books of the New Testament and find that only one three occasions would Christ have anything to do with Gentiles. His life on earth was to prove to Jews that he was their Messiah. And they rejected his Godly mission. And there is no way in the world that the books of Mat, Mark, Luke and John were in any way directed toward the Gentile world. It is through Paul that the Gentile world has found Christ and his meaning.


30 posted on 11/12/2021 10:34:07 AM PST by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Bookshelf

Don’t try an B.S. me dude.

Thayer Greek/KjV/English interlinerary translated from
the Textus Receptus ( NOT Maseoritic btw)

Strong’s Exaustive Concordance

are on my bookshelf.

( The only the Septuagint isn’t is cuz I have the Thayers/-)
All your assertation accomplishes is what is known as ‘ doing violence to the text”

The NT was written in Greek and the Hebrew word synagogue isn’t even in there.

13 17th century translations rabbit hole notwithstanding.


31 posted on 11/12/2021 11:03:25 AM PST by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

13 th century translations rabbit hole notwithstanding

What a weasel you are


32 posted on 11/12/2021 11:05:12 AM PST by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

The NT was written in Greek and the Hebrew word synagogue isn’t even in there.

When referring to the church


33 posted on 11/12/2021 11:09:23 AM PST by cuz1961 (USCGR Veteran )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Bookshelf

The Pope’s Jesus of December 25, January 1, February 2, Good Frigg day, saturn day, sun day is not the same Jesus as the Passover Lamb, that Paul taught..

Paul’s Jesus, the Jesus, in accordance with the scriptures, is the Passover Lamb, Unleavened Bread and First Fruits of those have fallen asleep.

Those are the three days, in accordance with the scriptures, that is Paul’s first importance of the gospel..

Those three days, according to scripture, is the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob’s 6th work day, 7th Day Sabbath, 1st work day..

Islam can’t buy that.
Judaism can’t buy that.
Christianity can’t buy that.

They buy and sell Satan’s, the Beast’s and Antichrist Papacy version instead..

Gold, refined by fire, is to be purchased by the church.
Especially the end times church.

The book of Revelation sign of the woman, clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, is a sign described at the birth of the manchild.

That sign occurs in early fall today.
And that sign would have occurred in late summer thousands of years ago..

Nowhere near where Antichrist sells as truth..

That sign isn’t for Islam and Judaism.
They are Antichrists who deny the Son.

It’s for His people,His sheep, a revelation of Him.
Revealing Him.
And each revelation uncovers Satan’s deceits. The Beasts deceits and Antichrist’s deceits.

The Papacy buys and sells a Jesus that isn’t the Word Made Flesh.
And Islam, Judaism and the world accept Antichrist version of events..

They are just too blind to notice.
But that’s what about 2,000 years of demon possessed swine does.


34 posted on 11/12/2021 12:23:00 PM PST by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Yollopoliuhqui

He got the ball rolling!


35 posted on 11/12/2021 12:37:01 PM PST by The Ignorant Fisherman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

gibberish


36 posted on 11/12/2021 1:25:22 PM PST by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: delchiante

gibberish


37 posted on 11/12/2021 1:26:44 PM PST by Bookshelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Bookshelf

I’m sorry it’s not clear enough yet.

Paul has another Jesus than the Papacy and Pope.

According to scripture.

That certainly is not the opinion of the Beast or Antichrist.
Or the woman riding the Beast.
But according to scripture.


38 posted on 11/12/2021 2:23:17 PM PST by delchiante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Bookshelf

Ok, your statements right there are flat out wrong. It appears you seem ‘wise’ but you are not with that statement. God the Father, Son and Holy Ghost in no way ‘need’ any single human being to prevent them from dying.

It is absurd what you state. ‘... fingered to ensure that the Trinity would never die.’ That is not biblical nor part of Christianity one iota.


39 posted on 11/12/2021 4:57:54 PM PST by time4good
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Bookshelf

Wrong. Again, non-biblical non-Christian. Absurd.

Christ came to save ALL the world, not JUST the Jews. His life was simple - to come and be a spotless lamb that CHOSE to lay down His life willingly and then raise it up again 3 days later by CHOICE through the power of the Holy Spirit to break the power of Sin and Death. That’s the simple Gospel message of John 3:16. For God so loved THE WORLD, that He gave His Son.

God is no respecter of persons, but will use ANY human who humbles themselves, calls on the Name of Jesus to be saved and lays down their Life (Will/Self). Paul was a vessel such as this. It is arrogant and ignorant to say that God couldn’t have done it without Paul.

That in no way is to diminish the work of Paul as a faithful servant of the Cross for which God used mightily and produced much fruit of his labor. But, in his own words and testimony - it was not Paul’s greatness or anything, rather Christ working in him.


40 posted on 11/12/2021 5:12:33 PM PST by time4good
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson